# Event

Memo:
entry partially cut off at the end of this page in the register. End of entry where mother's name and address would be is completely illegible.


Memo:
no address given; registered "By ye ministers order"


Memo:
surname of child and father left blank in register entry.


Memo:
not explicitly stated as twins, but baptised on same day.


Memo:
not explicitly stated as twins, but both baptised on same day.


Memo:
actual date is 29 Feb 1687, but this date is not valid


Memo:
"Baker/:" noted in th eright margin next to entry. It is unclear if it is a correction of the family's noted surname or the possible occupation of the father.


Memo:
address completely illegible in register


Memo:
entry only partially legible; address not given


Memo:
address not given; entry partially legible


Memo:
possibly twins, but not explicitly stated as such


Unrelated_memo:
dates of register entries go directly from 1568 to 1575, implies that no entries were made 1569-1574.


Memo:
there is a cross in the margin next to this entry


Memo:
there is a faded cross in the left margin next to this entry


Memo:
faded cross next to entry in left margin


Memo:
there is a faint cross in the left margin next to this entry


Memo:
there is a faint cross next to the entry in the left margin


Memo:
there is a small cross next to the entry in the left margin


Memo:
there is a small cross next to this entry in the left margin


Memo:
there is a small cross next to this entry in th eleft margin


Unrelated_memo:
there is a line drawn across the register page above this entry; it is unclear why this line was drawn


Memo:
there is a symbol next to this entry in the left margin, but I'm not sure what the symbol is. It looks like a small "o" attached to a large"3"


Unrelated_memo:
there is a small line drawn above this entry in the left margin; it seems to indicate the start of a new year in the register


Memo:
there is a faint cross next to this entry in the left margin


Memo:
shorthand abbreviation before name that looks like "Tssh"


Memo:
this entry is nearly completely cut off from the top of this page and only the date is legible.


Unrelated_memo:
There is a gap in the register after this entry. The next entry in from 1650.


Memo:
register entries change from 1660 to 1654 unexpectedly on the same page.


Unrelated_memo:
above this entry is the note "heare begineth the great sickness"


Memo:
only the month and year are noted in the entry,, so the default date of 1 January has been entered.


Memo:
underneath this entry is a note "paid Mr Westson"


Memo:
not in the right margin "paid Mr Weston to this"


Memo:
note above this entry which read "[c]arrie throug ye P[ar]asse"


Memo:
note this entry is partially cut off in the picture


Memo:
day not given in entry, just month and year - defaulted to the first of the month


Memo:
month should be March, but it looks more like "Jan" so may be out of order in register


Memo:
Date is partly illegible due to binding of manuscript. Possibly 25 May. Should be between 24 and 28 May.


Memo:
Date appears to be 25 rather than 26 June.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 18 August as appears under entry of that day. However, there is no bracket to link them as is usually the case. The next entry is for 20 August.


Memo:
This event is marked by a pointing hand in the left margin.


Memo:
Date is difficult to read due to binding of volume. Looks like '"first".


Memo:
"Thomas Harridance Cittizen and Iron-monger of London, and Parish Clarke here in this parish for the space of Nineteene yeares, and fiue Monethes … he was a verie Carrfull & Industrious man in his place". This entry is written in a bigger and neater hand.


Memo:
There is an "x" to the left between this and the following entry (which is dated 26 June). A marginal note states "[ ] the new Clark sets the Cart before the horse".


Memo:
20 December is the correct date for this entry. It appears after entries for 26 and 28 December. There is a note to the right of this entry which states "Ouerslipt".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the margin beside this entry.


Memo:
Correct date is 5 August 1602. This entry is out of sequence. There is a pointing hand in the margin beside this entry and the entry begins "Memorandum that …"


Memo:
This entry is written in a slightly larger and neater hand.


Memo:
Date appears to be 18 December, but difficult to be absolutely certain due to binding of volume. Other copy of register - image CIMG5507 - confirms date as 18 December.


Memo:
Same date as previous entry. That date appears to be 18 December, but difficult to be absolutely certain due to binding of volume. Other copy of register - image CIMG5507 - confirms date as 18 December.


Memo:
Date appears to be 27 or 28 December but difficult to read due to binding of volume. Other copy of register - image CIMG5507 - confirms date as 28 December.


Unrelated_memo:
Following this entry there is a note to the effect that this is the end of the Register of Burials for St Botolph without Aldgate, October 1593 - December 1599, "And since continued and copied out of the great Register belonging to the said Parish. By John Clerke Parish Clarke there", in November 1618. Beneath this there is a Latin invocation praising God. In the left margin there is a drawing of a skull beneath an hourglass, beneath which is a scroll with "Christu' mihi vita'. There are also two (less well-drawn) skulls beneath this one.


Unrelated_memo:
In the left margin beside this entry is written "Marche 1603" and above this in a different hand is written "Here . Begineth ye Burialls . ye first yere of ye raigne of our sou[er]i[n]ge Lo[rd] Kinge James".


Memo:
This entry does not have a date beside it but it appears amidst the numerous entries for 30 July 1603.


Memo:
There is no date beside this entry, but it appears amidst numerous entries for 10 August 1603.


Memo:
This entry is incomplete. It reads "   Bond   two    Bond . in est Smithfold . ye Tenth", with gaps at the forenames and the relationship.


Memo:
There is no date beside this entry, but it appears amidst numerous entries for 11 August 1603.


Memo:
There is a mark in the left margin beside this entry.


Address:
dwellinge as you[e] goe, to Tow[e]r hill


Memo:
There is a "x" in the left margin beside this entry.


Memo:
This entry is written in a bigger and neater hand than the others.


Memo:
There is a large "X" in the margin to the left of this entry.


Unrelated_memo:
What appears at first sight to be the next entry in the register is a notice with a pointing hand to its left. It reads "M[aste]r Riges Came to be Cvrat in this p[ar]ishe of S[ain]t Bvtolphe the Ninthe of Septe[m]b[er]"


Memo:
Duplicate entry? This entry is almost identical to the one which is two above it. Similarly the next entry is very similar to the one two above it. Have these two entries been repeated?


Memo:
This entry is almost, although not exactly, identical to the one which is two above it. Similarly the previous entry is very similar to the one two above it. Have these two entries been repeated?


Memo:
This entry is dated 28 January 1603. It comes after an entry for 17 January, but before entries for 22 and 27 January.


Unrelated_memo:
Between this entry and the next entry is written in a larger, neater hand: "Memorandvm Steeuen Stephones and William Hitchmouthe Came to bee Churchewardenes the 17th of December 1604".


Unrelated_memo:
Between the previous entry and this entry is written in a larger, neater hand: "Memorandvm Steeuen Stephones and William Hitchmouthe Came to bee Churchewardenes the 17th of December 1604".


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the next entry is written in a different hand "Anno Domini 1604 Die mensis Feb[-]" to the left with a bracket, to the right of which is "Here beginneth Henrye Rigges Curate of ye parrish chourch of St Buttolph w[i]thout Algate London to wright ye Register of ye Buriall[es]. To the right of this is a bracket followed by "Det christus scriptis vela secundis meis".


Unrelated_memo:
Between the previous entry and this entry is written "Anno Domini 1604 Die mensis Feb[-]" to the left with a bracket, to the right of which is "Here beginneth Henrye Rigges Curate of ye parrish chourch of St Buttolph w[i]thout Algate London to wright ye Register of ye Buriall[es]. To the right of this is a bracket followed by "Det christus scriptis vela secundis meis".

Memo:
To the left of this entry is written in the margin "Januarye 1604 vp[er] East"


Memo:
There are two symbols (orbs with crosses) to the left and right sides of this entry.


Memo:
There are two symbols (orbs with crosses) to the left side and one to the right side of this entry.


Address:
Jening[es] Rent[es] in easte smithfeilde


Address:
3 King[es] Alley in the Mynories streete


Address:
ye same place [ye gardens by Hownsditch]


Address:
ye same precyncte [ye Tower Hill precyncte]


Memo:
To the left of this entry is written in different ink and hand "no p[ar]ishioner"


Memo:
To the right of this entry is written in different hand and ink - "Everest".


Address:
ye same place [ye gardens neere Hounsditch]


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger and different hand.


Memo:
This entry, dated 1 November 1608,  is written in the left margin in a different hand from the other entries on this page. It is placed after the entry of John Smyth on 2 November and alongside those of Peter Studham & Elizabeth Deemar on 2 & 3 November.


Memo:
This entry has a pointing hand to its left and to its right a bracket followed by "Bastard"


Memo:
This entry is written in a different, bigger hand and has a bracket to its right followed by a drawing of a skull.


Memo:
Regarding date - This entry comes between entries dated 6 and 8 March 1608. The subject of this entry died in the parish on 2 March but was buried in Kent. No exact date of burial can be ascertained from the entry.


Address:
east smithfeild neere vnto Swanne Alley stayres


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand in the left margin (beside the previous and next two entries).


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand in the right margin, beside the previous and next three entries.


Memo:
There is a pointing hand to the left of this entry. This entry is linked to the following entry by a bracket and in a different hand a note is written to the right of these two entries (see Comment field)


Memo:
There is a pointing hand to the left of this entry. This entry is linked to the previous entry by a bracket and in a different hand a note is written to the right of these two entries (see Comment field)


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand in the right margin beside the previous and next two entries.


Memo:
This entry is dated 8 May 1609. It is the first entry of the page. The last entry of the previous page was dated 9 May 1609.


Memo:
There is a note in a different hand in a box to the right of this entry which reads "Hir name was Mary Rush . ye wife of Richard Rush . a poore man".


Unrelated_memo:
After this entry there is a gap of 2-3 lines in the manuscript before the next entry.


Unrelated_memo:
Above this entry there is a gap of 2-3 lines in the manuscript after the previous entry.


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the margin to the left of this entry.


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger neater hand than the others on the page.


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger, neater hand than the other entries on the page.


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry.


Memo:
This entry is written in the left margin after the previous entry and beside the next two entries. It is written in a different hand from the other entries.


Address:
Garden Alley in ye precynct by Tower Hill


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the next entry there is a hole in the manuscript.


Address:
great Brickhouse in Hogge Lane, nere unto the Artillery yard


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another eight entries: "Theise nyne Children were Christned on Sunday the third day of March 1610"


Address:
Yardley Hasting[es] in ye Countye of Northampton


Unrelated_memo:
Marginal note linking this and another eight entries, ends "God Blesse them all".


Address:
the three kinges Alley neere the Mynories


Memo:
This entry is incomplete but appears to be included among those dated 4 August 1611.


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger, neater hand than the other entries.


Address:
ye three king[es] Alley, nere ye Mynories


Memo:
duplicate     There is a note to the right of this entry which states that "this name is entred before". The entry concerned is the last entry on the previous page of the MS.


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another four entries: "Theise fiue Children were Christned on Sunday the Twentith day"


Address:
the Kinges Storehouse in East Smithfeild


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another six entries: "Theis seauen Childre[n] were Christned on Sunday the Seauen=teenth day of this Moneth"


Memo:
**** NB Date is 29 February 1611 (but isn't being accepted by the db!) ****


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand in the left margin.


Memo:
Date given in MS as "one and Thirtieth day of June 1612 then being Whitsunday" but amongst entries for May. MS "June" is an error for "May".


Address:
neere tower Hill in the liberty of London


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand to the others on the page.


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand in the left margin, alongside the next four entries.


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger, neater hand than most of the other entries on the page.


Unrelated_memo:
Following this entry there is a deleted entry with a note in the right margin beside it, which states: "this was a Buryall and mistaken"
The deleted entry reads: "William Hodgekins sonne to william Hodgekins [?] in Harrow Alley"


Unrelated_memo:
Above this entry there is a deleted entry with a note in the right margin beside it, which states: "this was a Buryall and mistaken"
The deleted entry reads: "William Hodgekins sonne to william Hodgekins [?] in Harrow Alley"


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another five entries: "Theis Six Children were Christned on Sunday the tenth day of January 1612"


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another two entries: "Theis Foure Children were Christned the Thirtieth day"


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another four entries: "Theise Five Infants were Christned on Sunday, the First day of August"


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand in the left margin. There is an asterisk above it and a corresponding asterisk between the two entries in which it should be placed in the main text.


Address:
in the liberty of East-smithfeild in Morleys Rentes


Memo:
Marginal note linking this and another five entries: "Theise Six Children were Christned on Sunday, the Fift day of September, 1613"


Address:
ye three king[es] alley neere the Mynories


Memo:
Regarding date, to the right of the entry is written: "Christned on St Andrewes day 30 Nouembris 1613".


Address:
the High street in the Parishes Rent[es]


Address:
the three king[es] Alley in the Mynories streete


Memo:
This entry is written in a slightly larger, neater hand than the other entries on the page.


Memo:
This entry is added at the foot of the page and is out of sequence, being dated 3 July 1614. The clark states that he was unaware of the baptism "till the Mother was Churched".


Address:
ye three King[es] Alley neere ye Minories


Unrelated_memo:
There is an asterisk in the left margin beside this entry and another asterisk in the left margin between the entry dated 7 September and those dated 11 September 1614 - to indicate that this entry has been written out of sequence.

Memo:
This entry is out of sequence in the register. Date is 9 September 1614.


Unrelated_memo:
Below this entry there is an undated entry that has been scored out "Nathaniel Bodye sonne to Thomas Bodye a Silkthrouster in Hounsditch"


Unrelated_memo:
Above this entry there is an undated entry that has been scored out "Nathaniel Bodye sonne to Thomas Bodye a Silkthrouster in Hounsditch"


Memo:
This entry (with spelling "Bodye") had been written erroneously and crossed out earlier in the page, following an entry for 16 December 1614.


Unrelated_memo:
After this entry there is a gap of about two lines before the next entry in the same month.


Unrelated_memo:
Above this entry there is a gap of about two lines following the previous entry in the same month.


Unrelated_memo:
There is an asterisk in the left margin beside this entry.


Address:
Hogg-lane neere the Barrs without Aldgate


Memo:
Date is 7 January 1614. This entry has been written out of sequence. There is an asterisk in the margin to its right (and an asterisk on the previous page indicating where it should have been written).


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. Date is 15 January 1614.


Memo:
The entry is not dated, but comes between entries for 2 and 9 April 1615. It refers to the baptism taking place "about the latter end of March last 1615" which the clark "knew not of till a weeke after". There is a pointing hand in the left margin.


Unrelated_memo:
After this entry there is the following in a larger, neater hand "On the Eighteenth Day of this Moneth of April Anno Domini 1615. The new Church-yard (or Buriall place) in Rosemary Lane was Consecrated By the Reuerend Father in God, John Bishoppe of London, in the foorenoone, at which time M[aste]r Briggs our Minister preached before ye said Bishoppe, his text was taken out of the xxviijth Chapter of St Matthewes Gospel, and part of the Sixt verse. For hee is risen as he said, &c". There is a skull drawn in the left margin beside this.


Unrelated_memo:
Before this entry there is the following in a larger, neater hand "On the Eighteenth Day of this Moneth of April Anno Domini 1615. The new Church-yard (or Buriall place) in Rosemary Lane was Consecrated By the Reuerend Father in God, John Bishoppe of London, in the foorenoone, at which time M[aste]r Briggs our Minister preached before ye said Bishoppe, his text was taken out of the xxviijth Chapter of St Matthewes Gospel, and part of the Sixt verse. For hee is risen as he said, &c". There is a skull drawn in the left margin beside this.


Memo:
In the left margin beside this entry is written "A Bastard Christned that was cast into A Privie by a Lewd Strumpet ye Mother in Hounsditch"


Memo:
Date is 13 February 1615. In the left margin beside this entry there is a pointing hand and the following note: "Theise two Children of william Handes, were by oversight, entred in a wrong place"


Memo:
The date of this entry is not certain as it is undated. It is placed after an entry for 6 December 1616 and before six entries for 8 December 1616.


Memo:
Date is 26 December 1616. Note in left margin states "This was ouerseene"


Memo:
This entry is incomplete and is not dated. It is placed between entries dated 28 November and 30 November 1617.


Memo:
Marginal note links this entry and nine other entries: "Theise tenne Children were Christned on Sunday the fifteenth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger, neater hand than the others on the page.


Memo:
Date is 5 July 1618. In the left margin is written "ouerslipt" followed by a pointing hand.


Memo:
This entry and another eight entries are linked with a marginal note: "Theise Nine Children were Christned on Sunday the two and Twentith day of Nouember 1618"


Memo:
Date is 16 January 1618. This entry is placed after several for 17 January.


Memo:
This and the next entry are listed under the heading for April 1619, but are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise 2 Children were Christned the xxxjth day of March".


Memo:
This and the previous entry are listed under the heading for April 1619, but are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise 2 Children were Christned the xxxjth day of March".


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the following entry there is a "+" with a marginal mark too.


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the previous entry there is a "+" with a marginal mark too.


Memo:
Date is 7 April 1619. There is a mark in the left margin, which corresponds to one earlier on the page, with "Ouerslipt"


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry, which is written in a larger, neater hand than the other entries on the page.


Memo:
A marginal note links this and ten other entries: "Theise Eleauen children, weare Christned on Sunday the sixteenth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
The date is not clear for this entry. At the end of the entry it states "Christned ye" & there is a small gap. The previous 6 entries are dated 20 February and are linked together. The next 3 entries after this one are dated 27 February and are linked.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence with a pointing hand in the left margin. It is written as a memorandum and concerns a baptism that took place "in the Moneth of Aprill last past". The clark had no knowledge of this until the wife was churched.


Memo:
This entry along with seven other entries are linked together with a marginal note: "Theise Eight Children were Christned the Twelft day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and eight other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Nine Infant[es] were Christned the one and Twentith day"


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. Beneath the entry which follows this one is the following comment, which relates to both entries: "wee are thus informed of theise two Children, but God knowes whether it be true or noe".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. Beneath this entry is the following comment, which relates to this entry and the previous entry: "wee are thus informed of theise two Children, but God knowes whether it be true or noe".


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise seauen Children were Christned the Eighteenth day of March . 1620".


Memo:
This entry is written in the top left hand corner of the page with a marginal mark indicating that it should be placed between the first and second entries on the page.


Memo:
The baptism subject and father's name have been erased from this entry - but traces are still visible and can be read.


Memo:
This entry is written in the left margin with a symbol to indicate the two entries between which it should be placed.


Memo:
Marginal note links this entry and nine other entries: "Theise tenne Children were Christned on the fifteenth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
Marginal note links this entry and nine other entries: "Theise tenne Children were Christned on the fifteenth day of this Moneth". This entry is incomplete: "Sara     daughter to".


Memo:
This entry is incomplete. It reads: "Sara     daughter to".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. Date of baptism is Friday 14 September 1621. Entry is out of sequence and states that it was "by oversight placed wrong".


Memo:
This entry and seven other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Eight Children were Christned the Eight & Twentith day".


Memo:
This entry and nine other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise ten Children weare Christned on Sunday the Eighteenth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. The entry is dated 4 January 1621 and is written out of sequence because the baptism took place at home and "I, John Clerke the Parish Clarke knew not of till the Mother came to be Churched".


Memo:
This entry and another eleven entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise 12 Children were Baptized on Sunday the Twentith day of Januarie Anno D[omi]ni 1621".


Memo:
This entry is the last entry on the page and is dated around 11 January 1621. It is out of sequence and states that the baptism took place "about the Eleaventh day of this Moneth, which was vnknowen to the Clarke till she was Churched".


Memo:
This entry is incomplete. It reads simply: "William      sonne to".


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise seauen Children were Christned ye Seauenteenth day."


Memo:
This entry and seven other entries are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise Eight Children were Christned the Foureteenth day of this Moneth of Aprilll Anno 1622"


Memo:
This entry and another four entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Five Children were Christned the fourth day".


Memo:
This entry is written in a slightly larger and neater hand than the other entries on the page.


Memo:
This entry and two other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise three Children were Christned the first day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise seauen Children were Christned the Two and Twentieth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise seauen Children were Christned on the Thirteenth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and five other entries are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise Six Children were Christned, the fifteenth day of this Moneth"


Memo:
This entry and five other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Seauen Children were Christned the Sixteenth Day of this Moneth".


Memo:
There is a marginal note to the left of this entry: "wee doubt this Thomas be some base Child the mother never came to be Churched".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this undated entry (a gap has been left for the day). The baptism subject was baptised at home "the   day of May, which I John Clerke the parish Clarke, knew not of, till it was brougte to be buried".


Memo:
This entry and three other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise 4 Children were Christned the Two and Twentieth Day".


Memo:
This entry comes at the end of the sequence for the month of June and is dated "about ye xxvijth day".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise five Children were Christned the Foure & Twentieth Day".


Memo:
This entry and five other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Six Children were Christned, the one and Thirtieth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
"No Parishioner" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry, which is written out of sequence. The baptism took place at home on 5 September "which, the parish Clarke had no knowledge of, till such time as ye Mother was Churched".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise six Children were Christned the Nyneteenth day".


Memo:
This entry and another six entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise seauen Children were Christned the six and Twentith day of this Moneth"


Memo:
There is a marginal note to the left of the entry, but it is partly illegible due to the binding. "wee" and "a" can be distinguished.


Memo:
Date is only partly legible. Probably is 16 November.


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Seauen Children were all Christned the Fourteenth day".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Five Children were Christined the Fourth day".


Memo:
This entry and five other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Six Children were Christned the Eleauenth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry (dated 9 January). Baptism took place "about the Ninth day of this Moneth, which, I, the Parish Clarke knew not of till ye Mother was Churched".


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Eight Children were Christned the Eighteenth day".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. The date is uncertain. The baptism "by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister" took place "about the Midle of this Moneth, which I, the parish Clarke knew not of a good while after".


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this note. This is the first of three related notes. At the end of the three is the statement "Theise three notes were here Entred at the Request of M[aste]r Vandebrooke aforenamed". Date is birth date.


Memo:
This is the second of three related notes. At the end of the three is the statement "Theise three notes were here Entred at the Request of M[aste]r Vandebrooke aforenamed". Date is birth date.


Memo:
This is the third of three related notes. At the end of the three is the statement "Theise three notes were here Entred at the Request of M[aste]r Vandebrooke aforenamed". Date is birth date.


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal comment: "Theise seauen Children were Christned the Fourth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and seven other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Eight Children were Christned the Thirtieth day of May 1624".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise five Childre[n] were Christned the fourth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Five Children were Christned the five & Twentieth day".


Memo:
Date is 21 September 1624 (out of sequence in the register).


Memo:
This entry and another six entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise seauen Childre[n] were Christned the Third day of this Monenth".


Memo:
This entry and another six entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise seauen Children were Christned the seauenteenth day of this Monenth".


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger, neater hand than most of the other entries on this page.


Memo:
This entry and five other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Eight children were Christned the Fourteenth day of this Moneth". [Recte seven children]


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. This entry is written out of sequence. The baptism took place on 11 November "which I the Clarke had no knowledge of till the xxth day of the said Moneth"


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Eight Children were Christned the Fift day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and six other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise seauen Children were Christned the Six & Twentith day of this Moneth".


Memo:
Date is 15 January 1624 (out of sequence in the register).


Memo:
This entry is written in the left margin. Date is "about the Ninth day" of February.


Memo:
This entry is written in the left margin. Date is "about the Nineteenth day" of February.


Memo:
This entry and nine other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Ten Children were Christned the Twentieth day of this Moneth".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are linked with the marginal note: "Theise Six Children were Christned the Sixt day".


Memo:
Date is 18 March 1624. This entry and the next entry are linked with the note: "were Christned the xviijth day, & wrong entred".


Memo:
Date is 18 March 1624. This entry and the previous entry are linked with the note: "were Christned the xviijth day, & wrong entred".


Memo:
Date is 15 May 1625 (out of sequence in register).


Memo:
From this entry onwards the hand changes to that of another clark.


Memo:
This entry is incomplete. It reads simply: "John    son to".


Unrelated_memo:
The next folio of this volume (p. 401) has the heading "Christnings ended", beneath which there is a note in a different hand: "An  Account of A Marriage of A Dumb Person in this Book to be found in Decem[be]r 1618".


Memo:
Date is 14 December 1625 (written out of sequence in the register).


Memo:
Date appears to be 6 January 1625. However, there is a hole in the manuscript at just the point where the date, if different from the previous entry, would be written.


Memo:
Date for this (and the next entry) looks as if it was a "6" which has been corrected to an "8".


Memo:
Date for this (and the previous entry) looks as if it was a "6" which has been corrected to an "8".


Memo:
Entry is incomplete. It reads simply "John Elliott so[n] to".


Memo:
This entry reads simply "Richard Martin".


Memo:
Entry is incomplete. It reads "Georg ffrith son to".


Memo:
This entry is undated. It is the first entry under the heading for May 1626, and is the last entry on the page.


Memo:
Date is 6 September (placed out of sequence in the register).


Memo:
This entry is written as last of entries under date 24 June 1627 but note to right states that date of baptism is 1 July 1627.


Memo:
Date is 12 January 1627 (out of sequence in register).


Memo:
Date is very faded. Appears to be 15 May.


Memo:
Date is 20 September 1631. "misplaced" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Memo:
Date of entry in register is 29 October 1631, but baptism took place on 25 October. "[Christ]ned octob: 25" is written at the end of the entry.


Memo:
This entry is the first entry of those that are dated 10 June 1632. However, date of baptism is 11 June as to its right is written: "this only was [Christ]ned the 11th day".


Memo:
This entry is included in the entries dated 28 August 1632. However, baptism date is 2 September as note to the right of the entry states: "[Christ]ned septemb[e]r 2".


Memo:
This entry is written in a larger hand than the others on the page.


Memo:
This entry is very similar, but not identical, to the previous entry.


Memo:
This entry is listed as the last of those which are dated 29 June 1634. However, a note at the end of the entry gives the baptism date as 1 July.


Memo:
This entry is listed under the entries dated 13 November 1634. However, a note at the end of the entry states that the date of the baptism is 11 November.


Memo:
This entry is listed under the entries which are dated 30 November 1634. However, date of December 1 is stated to the right of this entry.


Memo:
This entry is included under the date 23 January 1634. However, at the end of the entry it is stated that the baptism took place on the "xxijth daie".


Memo:
This entry is written in a slightly larger hand than the other entries on the page.


Memo:
This entry is included among the entries dated 25 March 1635. However, at the end of the entry it states that the baptism took place on "the 24th daie".


Memo:
This entry is listed as the last of the entries dated 10 May 1635. However, at the end of this entry there is a note stating that the baptism took place on "the 7th day".


Memo:
This entry is incomplete and reads simply: "Elizabeth      daught[e]r to".


Memo:
This entry is listed under the date 17 April 1636. However, at the end of the entry it states that the baptism took place on "the ninteenth daie".


Memo:
This entry is included as the last entry among the April entries, but it is clearly dated 1 May (with "1" at the start of the entry and, at the end, a note stating that the baptism took place on "May 1").


Memo:
This entry is incomplete. It states only "William".


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are written at the beginning of the entries for October 1636. No numeral is written for the day, but the next dated entry is 2 October 1636. Date is presumably 1 October 1636.


Memo:
This entry is listed as the second of two entries dated 17 February 1636. However, at the end of it is the statement that the baptism took place on 13 February: "baptized ye 13th daie".


Memo:
Date is 18 August 1637. This entry is out of sequence in the register. Placed at the end of the entries for August, it is the last entry on the page. "18" is in the left margin and the entry states that the baptism took place on "the 18th of this moneth".


Memo:
This entry is dated 14 December 1637. It is misplaced in the register, coming between entries dated 15 and 16 December. It has "14" to its left and "baptized the 14th day" at its end.


Memo:
Date is 30 December 1637. This entry is out of sequence in the register and is placed at the end of the entries dated 31 December. However, at its end it states "baptized the 30th daie".


Memo:
Date of baptism is 23 January 1637. This entry is included as the second of two entries dated 24 January. However, at the end of it is the statement that the baptism took place on "the 23th daie".


Memo:
Date is 18 May 1690. This entry and two other entries are placed out of sequence in the register - i.e. between entries dated 21 and 23 May.


Memo:
cf. entry on previous page for 31 May 1690.


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand from the others on the page.


Memo:
This entry is incomplete and is quite faint. It reads simply: "George".


Memo:
Address is very faint; ending is illegible. Possibly "Grauel lane".


Memo:
Date is illegible. Most of this entry is illegible. What has been entered here (forenames and address) is not certain.


Unrelated_memo:
Above the page number there is what appears to be a brief note by or about the clerk.


Memo:
Address ends in "Alley" but first word is illegible.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence and is the last of the entries for February 1690. It is written in a different ink from the other entries on the page.


Memo:
Ending of address is illegible owing to faintness.


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand from the other entries on the page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence. Its position suggests that it may have been squeezed in after the rest of the entries for February were written. Last three letters of address "ice" cannot be seen clearly.


Memo:
Date is 23 February 1691. This entry is written out of sequence, being placed between entries dated 19 and 21 February 1691.


Memo:
Date of entry is 19 June 1692. This entry is written out of sequence as it is placed between entries dated 20 and 21 June.


Memo:
Entry is incomplete and reads simply "Margrett     d[aughte]r of".


Unrelated_memo:
Hand changes at this point in the manuscript.


Memo:
Address "Graf Lean" is interlineated between this and the next entry. It presumably refers to this entry as the next entry has "East end" as its address.


Memo:
In address "Lean" is written above "Graf" at end of line.


Unrelated_memo:
This is the first entry for September 1692. Between the heading for September and this entry, "Henry"? is written in the extreme right-hand side of the page.


Memo:
Address is illegible (bottom of it is cut off from image).


Memo:
Entry is incomplete and reads simply: "Robertt Warren son to".


Memo:
Address is not certain - it is difficult to read.


Memo:
In address the first "h" is written as superscript.


Memo:
"Pore"? is written at the end of the entry, in the position where the address is given for the other entries on the page. Is this an address, or the description - poor?


Memo:
There are six minims in the first word of the address.


Memo:
This entry is dated 28 (presumably February?). It appears between entries for 6 and 7 February.


Memo:
Address is possibly "East smith f", but ending is difficult to read.


Unrelated_memo:
This is the last entry on the page. There is then a gap before entries begin again under date 26 March 1693 on p. 305 (in a different hand).


Address:
ye Fortris House cok & hoop yard Houns dich


Memo:
At end of May 1695 baptisms but seems to be a burial - see person comment. Exact day of the date is not visible.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. The last letter of the address is no longer visible.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. Last part of the address is illegible.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. The last part of the address is illegible.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. There is a word before "yard" in the address. This may end in "bit"?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. This entry is mainly illegible.


Memo:
First digit of the date is not entirely visible.


Address:
att margrat Brouns Swan Aly -- East smith feil


Memo:
There is another illegible word at the end of the address.


Memo:
"not cristened" is written before the address.


Unrelated_memo:
At this point in the register, the hand changes again and has the heading "Henry Druell Begun March ye 14th 1693" (i.e. 1692/3). "March" is written over "Aprill".

Memo:
This entry is not dated to its left, but comes immediately below a heading with date 14 March 1693 (i.e. 1692/3).


Memo:
Address is given as "ditto", i.e. the "Gravel lane" of the previous entry.


Memo:
This entry is dated 24 March and is written out of sequence.


Memo:
This entry is dated 29 March 1693 and is written out of sequence.


Memo:
Two addresses are given at the end of the entry, but it is not clear whether each belongs to one parent or not.


Memo:
First word of the address cannot be seen due to the angle of the photograph.


Memo:
To the right of this entry and two other entries there is a bracket and "att Church" is written. Presumably this is the address.


Memo:
This entry is extremely faded, especially at the end.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in. The last word of the address, following "by ye", is not clear. May read "to" and superscript "r" - "to[we]r"?


Memo:
"Nigg" is deleted before the start of the address.


Memo:
This entry is written in a different ink and is out of sequence, coming between two entries dated 6 August.


Memo:
This entry is very faded. There are two or three illegible words at the end of it (after, or as part of, the address).


Memo:
This entry is written in different ink from the surrounding entries.


Memo:
This entry is dated 28 August and is written out of sequence, following entries for 31 August.


Memo:
This entry is incomplete. There is a gap and then "Wild Harro Aly"


Memo:
Entry reads "Elizabeth Louell Estsmithfeeld" followed by, in different ink, "D[aughte]r to Richard and Mary".


Memo:
This entry is written in different ink and hand from the other entries on the page.


Memo:
"Lacerans" is written after the address. Description of the parents?


Memo:
Entry reads: "Mary Cob In Cobs Cort In Peticort Lane Church wardans".

Address:
In Cobs Cort In Peticort Lane Church wardans


Memo:
In address "Aly" is written in different ink.


Unrelated_memo:
There is a change of hand from this page.

Memo:
Possible duplicate? Cf. 2nd last entry on previous page (dated 7 May 1694). Here the date is given as "9" in the left margin, but the entry is the first one under heading with date "May ye 7th". In this part of the register these dates normally agree.


Memo:
In address "W[hi]t Chaple" is written in a different hand.


Memo:
This entry is dated 19 June 1694 and is written out of sequence.


Memo:
This entry is dated 25 June 1694 and is written out of sequence.


Memo:
This entry is dated 26 June 1694 and is written out of sequence.


Memo:
This entry is dated 16 October and is written out of sequence - as last of the entries for October 1694. Spelling of address is "miories"


Unrelated_memo:
On the next line after this entry "19" is written for the date, but there is no entry.


Unrelated_memo:
On the line above this entry "19" is written for the date, but there is no entry.


Unrelated_memo:
On the next line after this entry "25" is written for the date, but there is no entry.


Unrelated_memo:
On the line above this entry "25" is written for the date, but there is no entry.


Memo:
This entry is dated 28 January and is written out of sequence.


Memo:
This statement (or entry?) comes at the end of the entries for August 1694 on p. 324. It is not entirely clear whether it is a baptism entry or a statement (because of its nature and different hand).


Address:
ye Corner House of Gravill Lane --- Hounsd


Memo:
A "4" is part of the date, but it is not clear whether it represents 4 July or 14 July.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. Address is not certain.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "3" is visible, but could be 13 or 23. In address "chaple" is written above "whit".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "3" is visible, but could be 13 or 23. In address "right Ha" is written above "cort on ye".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "7" is visible, but could be 17 or 27.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "8" is visible, but could be 18 or 28.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "8" is visible, but not clear whether it is 18 or 28. "gal lan" is written above "nightin".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "9" is visible, but could be 19 or 29.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "0" is visible, but could be 20 or 30.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In address "gal lan" is written above "nightin".

Address:
ye cornor of Redcros Stret nightin gal lan


Memo:
In address "min" is written above "yar".


Memo:
This entry is dated 2 September and is written out of sequence, coming amidst entries dated 1 September.


Memo:
In the address it looks as if the scribe started to write "Aly" and then altered it to "Yard". What remains is "A" plus "ard" with ascender on the "a".


Memo:
In the address "Houns" is written above "Aly ner". It probably refers to this entry rather than the previous entry.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible but is likely to be between 8 and 11 September.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 13 September, but only "3" is visible.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 15 September, but only "5" is visible.


Memo:
Date is 15 September, but only "5" is visible.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 18 September, but only "8" is visible.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 22 September, but only "2" is visible.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 29 September, but only "9" is visible.


Memo:
Date is likely to be 29 September. There may be a faint "2" before the "9".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. At the end of the address "S" is followed by a superscript "n".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address there may be an erasure between "Barr" and "Ship".


Address:
at ye Wertounsons a Gainst ye Litle Minoris


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Lan" is written above "Gravil".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "next fidlers" is written above "Church yard aly".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Cheyars" is not certain.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address there is blotting around the word following "ye". It may begin with an "f" and it ends "es" - "fyres"?


Memo:
duplicate + crossed out - There is a note below the next entry which states that "thes to abov set doun before". The crossing out consists of a large "X" over the first part of the address which extends to the mother's name in the next entry.


Memo:
duplicate + crossed out - There is a note below this entry which states that "thes to abov set doun before". The crossing out consists of a large "X" over the name of the mother. This extends to the first part of the address in the previous entry.


Address:
Swan Aly by m[aste]r fisher[is] Shop minor


Memo:
There is a gap between "Aly" and "Minoris" in the address.


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Aly" and "Minori".


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Aly" and "Good".


Memo:
In the address "wollsak Al" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Memo:
In the address "nigh" is written above "Graps".


Memo:
In the address "sack" is written above "Brewhous".


Memo:
"m[aste]r" is written above "Swor" in the address.


Unrelated_memo:
The first two lines of this page are crossed out. They look as if they have been misplaced and are not baptism entries: "Edward Sismore Wi[f]e and Ann Chanlor We[d]o of St Mary Maudlins and St Olius South Work". Readings "Wi[f]e" and "We[d]o" are not certain.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "7" is partly visible and is possibly part of 17.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "7" is visible and is possibly part of 17. In the address there is an "e" written above the "o" in "Colys".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "8" is partly visible and is possibly part of 18.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "9" is visible and is possibly part of 19.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "1" is visible and is possibly part of 21.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "1" is partly visible and is possibly part of 21.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "2" is visible and is possibly part of 22.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "3" is visible and is possibly part of 23.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "4" is visible and is possibly part of 24.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "5" is visible and is possibly part of 25.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "7" is visible and is possibly part of 27.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "7" is visible and is possibly part of 27. In the address "sak Aly" is written above "hous Wool".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "9" is visible and is possibly part of 29.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not completely visible. "9" is visible and is possibly part of 29. This entry is written in a different hand from the others on the page.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. There is another word after "yard" in the address.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. There is a small gap between "Aly" and "Grauill" in the address.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address only the first half of the capital letter "H" has been written.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. This entry has been misplaced here. In the register it comes between event IDs 17053 and 17054.


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Barr" and "Ship".


Memo:
In the address "fe" is written above "brew".


Memo:
Unclear whether "Keen" is the surname or the first part of the address. "Rob[er]t and Mary Keen by ye Kene Cheyer Houn".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not entirely visible. Only "2" is visible, but probably is 22. In the address there is a gap between "Swan" and "Wooll".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "6" is visible, but probably 26. In the address "Smith" is written above "nere".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "6" is visible, but probably 26.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "6" is visible, but probably 26. Is "Plow" a surname or part of the address: "Georg & An Plow Harro Aly"?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "7" is visible, but probably 27.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "8" is visible, but probably 28.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "9" is visible, but probably 29.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "David and Mary Jack Smith - Minoris"
Is "Jack" a surname and "Smith" an occupation? Or are both part of the address?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Fidlers" is written above "Aly behind".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. The final "h" of the address is written above "dic".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "rents" is written above the end of "maudlin".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "hill" is written above "tower".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address there is a blot over the second "r" in "harro".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. The address is written above a deleted address (i.e. "Swan Aly East:").


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "yard minoris" is written above "nere Glashous".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Aly" is written above "Haro".


Memo:
In the address "ye Clock" plus another word ("minor"?) is written above "East ag". "ag" is probably "against" but full word cannot be seen.


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Aly" and "Houns".


Memo:
Does "a pore Chi" relate to the baptism subject? Entry reads: "Eliz[abeth] Attee d[augh]t[er] to Lawranc and Sarah a pore Chi - Squeril Aly"


Address:
by ye Kings head -- Ship brew housfeelds


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "pore" is written above "Mary Lan". Is this the description "poor" and does it apply to all the people in this entry?

Address:
ye farthist End of 7 Star Aly Rose Mary Lan


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. A "5" is partly visible. In the address "feld" is written above "East Smith".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. A "5" is partly visible.


Memo:
"Minoris"? is written above "yard" in the address.


Memo:
"Pore" is written before the address - is this a description which applies to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
"pore" is written before the address. Is this a description which applies to all of the people in this entry?


Address:
a Aly by ye cros Guns against Swan Aly East


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "East" and "Smith".


Memo:
In the address "minoris" is written above "yard".


Memo:
In the address "Rents" is written above "by ye".


Memo:
In the address "tower hi" is written above "new Ea".


Memo:
"hous felds" is written above the first part of the address.


Memo:
"pore" is written above "Rosmary Lane". Does this description refer to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
"Sack Aly" is written above the first part of the address.


Memo:
"East" is written above "yard" in the address.


Memo:
This entry reads: "Thomas and Mary Marshall by ye Blakamors head East Smithfeld"


Memo:
"Thomas son to: a" is written on the line above this entry. There is a "^" slightly below (between "son" and "to").


Memo:
In the address "East Smithfeld" is deleted after "bull" and "petticotlan" is written on the line below.


Unrelated_memo:
Below this entry and before the entries for May there is a statement "An End of this Yeare 1695 pt/96 pt"

Memo:
In the address "Hounsdich" is written above "Boul cort"


Memo:
In the date only the "2" is visible, but date is probably 12.


Memo:
Day of the date is not certain. A "3" may be visible, so possibly 13.


Memo:
In the date only "6" is visible, but likely to be 16.


Memo:
In the date only the "7" is visible, but likely to be 17.


Memo:
In the address the initial letter of "Griffin"? is "H".


Memo:
In the address "Gravill Lan" is written above "Suger lofe in".


Memo:
In the address "hermatag" is written above "nere ye".


Memo:
In the address "Street" is written above "High".


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Stret" and "Tower".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. "5" is visible, so probably 15.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. There may be a "6", so possibly 16. "pore" is written above the end of the address. Does this description refer to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. "8" is visible, so possibly 18.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible. "1" is visible, so possibly 21.


Memo:
In the address "ye" is written above and slightly to the left of "Star".


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only the "8" is visible, but probably 28.


Memo:
In the address "Lan" is written above "petticote".


Memo:
In the address the initial letter of "Hounsdich" is only half formed.


Memo:
"pore" is written before the address. Does this description refer to all of the people in this entry? In the address "Hounsdich" is written above "Arms Stil Aly".


Memo:
In the address "hous feelds" is written above "Ship brew"

Address:
by the 3 black burds Ship brew ^ hous feelds


Address:
ye | farthist End of Castel yard Hounsdich


Address:
a Gainst ye Black bull ----|-- Petticot Lane


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "Pore" is written at the end of the address. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "minor" is written above "hill".


Address:
An Aly bye Clock and Whete Shefe hounsdich


Memo:
In the address "Maudlins rents" is written above "Kathern Whele".


Memo:
The first word of the address ("next") has a large blot over it.


Memo:
In the address "att" is written above and between "Bone" and "Harro".


Memo:
"pore" is written at the end of the address. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible, but may be 6.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible, but possibly 7 or 9.


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above "Gravill".


Memo:
In the address "Lan" is written above the end of "Nightingal".

Address:
7 Stars ye farther end of Nightingal Lan


Memo:
"pore" is written before the address. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Katherns" and "Lane".


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "3" is visible, but date is likely to be 23.


Memo:
In the address "Minoris" is written above "cort".


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "5" is visible, but probably 25.


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "6" is visible, but probably 26.


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "6" is visible, but probably 26. In the address "hill" is written above "tower".


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "7" is visible, but probably 27.


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Possibly ends in  "8", so likely to be 28. "pore" is written before the address. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry? In the address "East" is written above "Swan Aly".


Memo:
The exact day of the date is not fully visible. Only "8" is visible, but probably 28.


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Chu" and "East".


Memo:
"East Smith fe" is written above the first part of the address.


Memo:
In the address "tower hill" is written above "Horshue". There is another word after "Horshue", possibly beginning "to".


Memo:
In the address "East" is written above "Arms".


Memo:
In the address "mussell bear East" is written above the first part of the address.


Memo:
Entry reads "Edward Mickelson to Edward & Mars m[aste]r Pills note Ship brewhous fe".


Memo:
In the address "by ye 3 Crons" is written above the line with "^" beneath it.


Memo:
In the date only the "3" is visible, but probably 23.


Memo:
"pore" is written above the address. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
In the address "Smithfeld" is written above "hors East".


Memo:
In the address "ye Cumpasis" is written above "Gravillan Behind".


Memo:
Duplicate - closely similar to previous entry.


Memo:
In the address "East" is written above "Warf".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not clear - possibly 16.


Memo:
Only "8" is visible in the date, but probably 18.


Memo:
Only "8" is visible in the date, but probably 18. In the address there is a gap between "cort" and "Petticot".


Memo:
Only "8" is visible in the date, but probably 18. There is some blotting over the first part of the address.


Memo:
Very little of the date can be seen - perhaps the end of an "8", so maybe 18. In the address there is a gap between "Snelleys" and "Harro".


Memo:
Only "9" is visible in the date, but probably 19. In the address "feld" is written above "hous".

Address:
by the 3 Black burds Ship brew hous feld


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible - probably around 19 October.


Memo:
In the address "tower hi" is written above "Kings Stret".


Address:
in a cort of ye left hand by ye carmans ho


Memo:
The address is broken up in this entry and not given in whole at the end: "John Haberdin Swan Aly son of John and Jane - East Smith feeld"


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "yard" and "Minoris".


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "cort" and "Still".


Memo:
In the address "yard Rose mary" is written below "forsters Cathern" and seems to apply to this entry rather than the address of the next entry.

Address:
at m[ist]r[es]s forsters Cathern Whe yard Rose mary


Memo:
In the address the initial letter of "Cort" is written over "S".


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Aly" and "Minor"


Memo:
In the address "ros" is written above "Aly". "pore" is written below "new". Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
In the address "lane" is written above "Stony".

Address:
ye farther end blak lyon yard Stony lane


Memo:
In the address "and" appears to be an error for "at".


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above the end of "petticote".

Address:
by m[aste]r Steuens ye Cook petticote lan


Memo:
In the address "inggal lan" is written above "head night".

Address:
at ye Wi[d]o Siluesters by munks head night inggal lan


Memo:
In the address there is a gap between "Pole" and "East".


Memo:
In the address "hill" is written above "tower".


Memo:
In the address "fel" is written above "hous".


Memo:
In the address "yard" is written above "King h".


Memo:
In the address "hill" is written above "Tower".


Memo:
In the address "yard Aly" is written above "cort Chur".


Memo:
In the address "dich" is written above "Castell". "a Lodger" is written at the end of the address - does this refer to just Eliz[abeth]?


Address:
by ye 3 black burds Ship brew hous feeld


Memo:
In the address "dich" is written above "houns".


Memo:
In the address "billit hou" is written above "ye crocke".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "Pore" is written at the end of the entry after the date. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Address:
att m[aste]r Peads in Red gat cort Minoris


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Smith feld" is written above "cort East".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "feld" is written above "Smith"


Memo:
In the date only "2" is visible, but probably 12. In the address "Aly" is written above "yard".


Memo:
In the date only "2" is visible, but probably 12.


Memo:
In the address "yard" is written above "hary".


Memo:
In the address "yard Aly" is written above "cort Church".


Memo:
In the date only "7" is visible, but probably 17.


Memo:
In the date only "7" is visible, but probably 17. In the address the final "s" of "Ractlifs" is written over an "e".


Memo:
In the date only "9" is visible, but probably 19. "Bar Ship brewhousfel" is written above the first part of the address.

Address:
att m[aste]r Letherlands by the Bar Ship brewhousfel


Memo:
In the date only "9" is visible, but probably 19.


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above "Nightingal"


Memo:
In the address "feld" is written above "hous".


Memo:
In the address "la" is written above "nightin".


Memo:
In the address "Aly" is written above "yar".


Memo:
"Pore" is written in the address between "Aly" and "Mino". Is this a description applicable to all of the people in this entry?


Address:
by ye 3 Cumpas Aly at Tho[mas] Sutton Haro Aly Petticot Lan


Memo:
In the address "East" is written above "Aly".


Address:
att a Cack house by ye Cook - Houns dich


Address:
3 croun cort by m[aste]r Colcots - Minoris


Address:
At m[aste]r Wilds by ye Doc[to]r Gravill Lan


Memo:
In the date only "7" is visible, but probably 27.


Memo:
In the date only "8" is visible, but probably 28.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "East" is written above "Pole".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Swan" is written above a deletion.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "feelds" is written above "yard".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. "pore" is written before the address. Does this description apply to all of the people in this entry?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Smithfeld" is written above "Plumer East".

Address:
by m[ist]r[es]s Smarts a Plumer East Smithfeld


Address:
att m[aste]r Phelpis a gainst ye Blak Bull Pettic


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above the end of "nightinggal".


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above the end of "nighting gal".


Memo:
End of address is not certain. "Stony"? is written above "new"?


Memo:
"Par Ch" is written at the end of the entry - parish child?


Memo:
There is another word at the end of the address.


Address:
a Gainst ye blew ball at a Slop Shop kings stret tower hill


Memo:
"ing gal lan" is written above the first part of the address.


Memo:
"in East Smith feld" is written above the first part of the address.


Memo:
In the address "East Smith feeld" is written above "ye Red Cros".

Address:
ye Pewterer a Gainst ye Red Cros East Smith feeld


Memo:
In the address "Houns dich" is written above "Castel yard".

Address:
By m[aste]r Barnets -- Castel yard Houns dich


Memo:
Only "8" is visible in the date, but probably 28.


Memo:
In the address "feld" is written above "Smith"

Address:
Suger lofe Aly by ye Wach hous East Smith feld


Memo:
In the address "Petticot l" is written above "Oxford Arms".


Memo:
In the address "Str" is written above "High".


Memo:
In the address "King Hary yard" is written above "of Greens rents".

Address:
ye cornor of Greens rents King Hary yard


Memo:
In the address "Gall lan" is written above "nighting".

Address:
at a strong Water Shop by nighting Gall lan


Address:
in Mad[a]m Lowders yard A Bucher Haro Aly


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May 1697.


Memo:
In the address "b" is the correct spelling before "ye" and "mnoris" is the correct spelling.


Memo:
In the address "felds" is written above "brewhous".

Address:
in a cort nere ye Barr Ship brewhous felds


Address:
a Cornor hous By m[aste]r Pumfreys meeting Grauill Lan


Memo:
In the address "Mary Lan" is written above "Bucher Rose".

Address:
att m[aste]r Wades a Bucher Rose Mary Lan


Memo:
In the address "Mary Lan" is written above "head Rose".


Memo:
In the address "Rose Mary lan" is written above "of 7 Star Aly".

Address:
ye farthist end of 7 Star Aly Rose Mary lan


Memo:
In the address "tower hill" is written above "Kings Stret".

Address:
att the Crucked Billit Kings Stret tower hill


Address:
at one Solbes by ye Dolphin Sun yard East


Memo:
In the address "Aly" is written above the second "yard".


Address:
att ye Red cros in Red cros cort High Stre


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible - possibly 4.

Address:
att ye 3 tobaco pips in ye Bucher row East


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not fully visible - possibly 5.


Memo:
Duplicate + crossed out. This is almost the same as the first entry on this page. Here the baptism subject's name is given as "Jane", however.


Memo:
In the address "lane" is written above "Rosemary".


Memo:
In the address "East Smith feld" is written above "May Pole".

Address:
a Pewterers Shop by ye May Pole East Smith feld


Memo:
In the address "East" is written above "row".


Address:
att m[ist]r[es]s Gould smiths in Red cros Stret


Memo:
In the address "la" is written above "Gra".


Memo:
In the address "by the" is written twice and "Grauil lan" is written above "the 3 Cumpas".

Address:
at m[aste]r Blacks by the by the 3 Cumpas Grauil lan


Memo:
In the address "yard" is written above "Hary".


Address:
att m[ist]r[es]s Sea mors Black Lyon yard Stony Lane


Address:
att m[aste]r Lapbeys a Gainst ye May Pole East Smithfeld


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Lan" is written above "Petticot".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "Hill" is written above "tower".

Address:
by the Crucked Billitt Kings Stret tower Hill


Address:
Brush Aly East Smith feeld by tower hill


Address:
a Gainst the Brod Plase Shipbrew hous felds


Memo:
In the address "feld" is written above "brewhous".


Memo:
In the address "in East" is written above "nightingallan".


Memo:
In the address "yard" is written above "Well".


Address:
att m[aste]r Adamsons by ye Rayls Minoris


Memo:
At the start of this entry the beginning of another entry has been deleted: "James Back coff son of James". In the address "hill" is written above "tower".


Memo:
In the address "Haro Aly" is written above "rents".

Address:
the farther end of Mad[a]m Lowders rents Haro Aly


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not certain. In the address "ta" is written before "m[aste]r" and "East" is written above "cort".

Address:
ta m[aste]r Houlborns the Cornor Hous Croun cort East


Memo:
Entry reads: "Peter Lanckett Caleb and Sarah att Doc Suters --- Houns dich". Are these three separate baptism subjects, or are Caleb and Sarah the forenames of the parents?


Address:
Behind m[aste]r Plats in Ship brewhous felds


Memo:
In the address "Petticot lane" is written above "Arms".


Memo:
In the address "Mary lan" is written above "Rose".


Address:
by m[aste]r Crogers in Ship brewhous felds


Memo:
In the address "Stret" is written above "High".


Memo:
In the address "nightinggall lan" is written below "Munmouths head". It probably applies to this entry rather than the next entry


Memo:
"nightingall lan" is written above "tower Hill", but it probably goes with the previous entry rather than this one. The deleted entry two down from this one would confirm this.


Memo:
Duplicate + crossed out. This entry is very similar to one dated 13 October (three entries earlier).


Memo:
In the address "Minoris" is written above "Starrs".


Memo:
In the address "felds" is written above "hous".


Memo:
In the address "yard" is written above "Sun".

Address:
at Richard Richards in Angil cort Sun yard


Memo:
In the address "Minoris" is written above "pops yard".


Memo:
In the address "cot lan" is written above "Peti".

Address:
at m[aste]r Greens by m[aste]r Becks Peti cot lan


Memo:
In the address "Smithfeld" is written above "hous East". First and last letters of "hous"? are written over other letters.


Memo:
In the address "smith feeld" is written below "pips East".


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above "Gravil".


Memo:
In the address "Eend" is the correct spelling and "Minoris" is written above "Lyon Aly".


Address:
next m[aste]r masons by the May Pole East


Memo:
In the address "ing gallan" is written above "yard by night".

Address:
at one Godders son yard by night ing gallan


Memo:
In the address "Hermatage" is written below "Baker by the". An earlier attempt to write this was made above rather than below.


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible. In the address "dich" is written above "Houns".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not visible - possibly 9?


Memo:
In the address "Rose Mary Lane" is written above "Kathern Whele yard".


Memo:
This entry is difficult to read because of blotting. Reading at the start may be "William Avery and Eliz[abeth]" or "William" ? "Avery and Eliz[abeth]"


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not very clear - may be 21. In the address "East" is written above "row".


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not very clear - may be 21.


Memo:
"Ship brew hous feelds" is written above the first part of the address.

Address:
by the 3 black birds Ship brew hous feelds


Memo:
In the address "inggallan" is written above "rents night".


Memo:
In the address "hous feld" is written above "Ship brew".


Memo:
"nightinggall lane" is written under the first part of the address.


Memo:
In the address "tower Hill" is written above "Kings Stret".


Memo:
In the address "yard" is written above "Goodm"


Memo:
"gat cort Minoris" is written below the first part of the address.

Address:
att m[ist]r[es]s thuragoods gat cort minoris


Memo:
In the address the initial letter of "Houns dich" is only half formed.


Memo:
In the address "Woodren" is the correct spelling.


Memo:
In the address "houn"? is written above "Gun y".


Address:
at m[aste]r Nobls ye farther end S Aly High Stret


Memo:
Entry reads "Mary Drink Water Timothy and Phelepah 7 Stars - Minoris". Are Timothy and Phelepah the parents with 'daughter of' omitted?


Memo:
In the address "feild" is written above "smith".


Memo:
In the address "Sret" is the correct spelling.


Memo:
There is a large blot over the end of "Gravill" in the address.


Memo:
Entry reads "Mary Bryon Henry and Marth". Are Henry and Marth the parents with 'daughter of' omitted?


Memo:
Exact day of the date is not certain - may be 29.


Memo:
"Tower Hill" is deleted at the end of the entry.


Memo:
This entry is placed out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 21 June.


Memo:
Entry is incomplete. It reads "Hester     Da[ugh]t[er] to          Church Yard Aly".


Memo:
Before the address an additional "Gra" is written over another word.


Memo:
The first word of the address is quite faded, but appears to be "King" with initial "H" written in error.


Memo:
Date is 5 August 1698.  A large "5" is written over "4" in the margin beside this entry and the "7" of the next entry.


Memo:
Date appears to be 5 August 1698. A large "5" is written over "7" in the margin beside this entry and the "4" of the previous entry.


Memo:
After the address there is a deletion ("Stony Lane").


Memo:
In the address "feld" is written above "house".


Memo:
In the address "land" is written over "long"?


Memo:
There is no numeral in the left margin beside this entry, as is normal in this manuscript for the dates of entries. This is the last entry on the page and previous date is 30 January.


Memo:
This looks as if it is the last part of an entry, with the first part missing. There is no numeral for the date in the left margin. Entry reads: "Jordens Chi: a brocker Houns dich".


Memo:
This entry is a bit muddled: "John Floyd son of William & Jacobwell yard & Sarah lane a foundling".


Unrelated_memo:
"Eliz Eliz" is written to the right beneath this entry.


Memo:
This entry is dated 5 June and is written out of sequence, being placed before the entries dated 4 June.


Memo:
Seems to be out of date order in register


Memo:
Date is 25 March. This entry is out of sequence, coming after an entry dated 28 March in the register. At the end of the entry is the statement "this was misplaced".


Memo:
This entry is dated 26 March and is misplaced, coming after an entry dated 29 March in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 2, 3 and 6 April.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the April entries and before the beginning of the May entries.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence, being placed at the top of the page before an entry dated 16 May.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence, being placed at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
This entry is misplaced in the register, coming after entries dated 28 and 29 June.


Memo:
This entry is misplaced in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 2, 5 and 7 July.


Memo:
This and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 2, 5 and 7 July.


Memo:
In the address "in Sheres y[ar]d in ye p[ar]ish" is written on the line below "whit Chapell" but a "^" suggests that it should go first.

Address:
in Sheres y[ar]d in ye p[ar]ish whit Chapell


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence, coming after entries dated 28 July.


Memo:
The date is not very clear - may be 3 July. If so, then this entry is out of sequence.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register as it is placed above entries dated 1 August.


Address:
of whit Chappell p[ar]ish but y[i]s ward


Memo:
Duplicate of previous entry (of 25 August), but of different date.


Memo:
There is a pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 6 October.


Memo:
"the sixt day" is written at the end of this entry.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 27 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming above the entries dated 1 December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 1 December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 1 and 2 December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 27 and 29 December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 29 and 30 December.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in. The numeral for the date in the left margin could read "23" but is probably "28" as this is the date given at the end of the entry.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 27 and 28 February.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 15 and 20 April.


Memo:
In the address "neare" is written as superscript.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April. Address reads "belly ally".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 6 May. At the end of the entry it states "this was misplaced".


Memo:
"brought out of" is written before the address. Entry reads "An Liddall daughter to Henry Liddall & An his wife brought out of the tower libertie"


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence, coming between entries dated 28 and 30 May. It looks as if it has been squeezed in. The first word of the address is "Moles".


Memo:
This and the next entry are placed out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
This and the previous entry are placed out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries for 1 July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 14 and 17 August. "this was misplaced" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
In the address "petecot" is written below the deletion "grauell".


Memo:
This and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 16 and 21 September. A note in the left margin states that "these two wer Baptized at home and I knew not of it till two days after".


Memo:
This and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 16 and 21 September. A note in the left margin states that "these two wer Baptized at home and I knew not of it till two days after".


Memo:
"hou" or "han" is written in error above the address.


Memo:
The first word of the address is not certain.


Memo:
This is the last entry on this page, but it is written out of sequence in the register, as the first entry on the next page is dated 2 November.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 4 and 6 November.


Memo:
After the address "in bishopsgate p[ar]ish" is written: "they being without a Minister I the Clarke of this p[ar]ish beinge Requested did prouide y[e]m"


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February. There is no numeral in the left margin beside this entry but its text gives the date as 7 February.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before the entries dated 1 March.


Memo:
In the address "goodmans" is written below the deletion "Chaquer".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the bottom of the page after entries dated 21 March 1651.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before an entry dated 1 April.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 8 and 13 April. "This was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April.


Memo:
This and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April.


Memo:
In the address the "o" of "harow" is written over another letter.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in. In the left margin there is the note: "Hester Cheltum was misplaced".


Unrelated_memo:
"B f 6" or "B 4 6"? is written after the address, but it is not clear whether or not this is related to the entry.

Memo:
"B f 6" or "B 4 6"? is written after the address, but it is not clear whether or not this is related to the entry.


Memo:
This and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 1 August.


Memo:
This entry is linked with the next two entries as there is a bracket after the names of the three baptism subjects. They are written as three separate entries, though.


Memo:
This entry is linked with the previous entry and the next next entry as there is a bracket after the names of the three baptism subjects. They are written as three separate entries, though.


Memo:
This entry is linked with the previous two entries as there is a bracket after the names of the three baptism subjects. They are written as three separate entries, though.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for August. There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of a page. The first entry on the next page is dated 3 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 21 and 26 September. "this was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 21 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 23 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 25 October. Date of baptism could be either 25 October or 31 October (date of entries before this), but its format suggests that the former is more likely.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register. They are the final two entries on the page. The first entry on the next page is dated 21 November.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 24 November.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in. Its date is not certain as there is no numeral beside it in the left margin (although previous entry is 5 December). Its text suggests date of 4 December, though.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 December. There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside it, but its text gives the date as 12 December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in  the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 12 December. There is a numeral "18" in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for December 1652. There is no numeral in the left margin beside it, but its text suggests that 14 December is the correct date.


Memo:
If there is an address it is illegible because of fading.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 7 January. The entry itself states "this was misplaced it was Baptized the sixth day".


Memo:
There is no numeral in the left margin for the date of this entry, although its text suggests that 29 January is the correct date. If so, this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before an entry dated 1 February.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in and may be written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
The date of this entry is not clear. If the previous entry (dated 5 February) has been squeezed in later - which seems to be the case - then this would make the date of this entry 1 February.


Memo:
This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in. It is written in different ink from the surrounding entries.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 13 February and 14 February (on the next page).


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 13 February and 14 February (on next page). The text of this entry suggests that its date is 9 February. Address is not clear - may contain "Har".


Memo:
The address "Est end" is written after the deletion "pond ally".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for March 1652/3.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 17 April and therefore it is written out of sequence. **NB** However, it states that the subject was "not bapti[zed]".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 6 May. "this was misplased" is written in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
In the left margin beside this entry is written: "Ralph Tufe this was entred at the parent[es] Request 7 dayes after ward"


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 24 July. "this was neglected" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the page. There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text reveals the date of baptism as 13 July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 31 July. "misplaced" is written in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before an entry dated 1 August. There is no numeral in the left margin beside it, but its text gives the date 2 August.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 August. It is included among the August entries in the register as it gives the date of birth as 29 August. However, it also states the date of baptism as 8 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 2 September (same as numeral in left margin for previous entry) and date of baptism as 4 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 29 and 30 September.


Unrelated_memo:
From October 1653 entries start to take the format of providing the dates of both the birth and the baptism. From the following page of the volume (until 24 March 1655) the monthly headings reflect this; e.g. "Borne & Baptized", "Births & Christnings".


Memo:
** NB The date of this entry is approximate. There is no numeral in the left hand margin beside it. The text reveals the date of birth as 13 October and states that the baptism took place "about a fortnight after". The entry is written out of sequence.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry. It looks as if it has been misplaced. The date of birth is 13 November 1653.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 22 and 23 January. "misplased" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January. There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 18 January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 16 and 19 February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 25 March. This entry seems to have been misplaced.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 14 May and before entries also dated 14 May on the next page.


Memo:
Date is the date of birth as the text of the entry makes clear.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 July. The entry is therefore written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 July.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 July. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July.


Memo:
This is the last entry on the page. It is written out of sequence in the register as entries begin with the date 20 August on the next page.


Memo:
In the address there are two "a"s at the start of "Aalgate".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 13 and 14 September. "this was neglected a few dayes" is written in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 September. It is the last entry on the page but is written out of sequence in the register as entries begin with date 17 September on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, which is the last of the entries under September. However, its text gives the date of baptism as 10 October. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 October. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for October.


Memo:
The address is written between the details of the mother and the dates of the birth and baptism. It is written again and deleted at the end of the entry (which is the more usual place for the address).


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October. There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside it, but its text gives the date of baptism as 17 October.


Memo:
The numeral for the date in the left hand margin - "20" - is written over "19".


Memo:
This entry and the next two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November. There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside it, but its text gives date of baptism as 16.


Memo:
This entry, the previous entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November. There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry,  but the date of birth is 28.


Memo:
This entry and the previous two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November. There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside it, but its text gives the date of baptism as 15.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 7 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register (as are the next two).


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 10, 11 and 7 December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the page after an entry dated 8 December. The first entry on the next page is dated 11 December. There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry.


Memo:
"tower hill" is deleted at the end of this entry.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for December.


Memo:
The address is written twice - before and after "born & baptizd ye 23th".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 19 February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 4 February. This entry is written out of sequence in the register coming after entries dated 19 and 7 February at the bottom of the page.


Memo:
In the address "w[hi]t" is followed by the deletion "ell ally" before "hart y[ar]d" - i.e. the address was originally written as "well ally".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 25 February. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
***NB***  date of birth is stated to be "29th ffebru[ary]".


Memo:
This entry and the next two entries at the bottom of the page are written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 18 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 16 March. This is one of three entries that are written out of sequence at the bottom of the page in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 6 March. This is the last of three entries that are written out of sequence at the bottom of the page in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written in different ink from the ones below it and it is written out of sequence in the register, coming before an entry dated 18 March.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April.


Memo:
In the left hand margin beside this entry the numeral for the date is given as "1". However, the text of the entry states that the date of birth is 1 May and that the date of baptism is 6 May. This entry looks as if it has been squeezed in later.


Memo:
The first part of the address is written over something else.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 10 and 13 May. "misplaced" is written in the left margin beside it.


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the next entry for May is the following: "Grace Ellis da[ughter] to Roger Ellis & Margrett his wife miores look next moneth for this". This "entry" appears as the first of the June entries (3 June).


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the previous entry for May is the following: "Grace Ellis da[ughter] to Roger Ellis & Margrett his wife miores look next moneth for this". This "entry" appears as the first of the June entries (3 June).


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 19 May. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 8 June. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 15 July. "this was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 16 July.


Unrelated_memo:
**NB** continued from Memo box: "and after was del[i]uered of this Childe: the 16th day of y[i]s July & was baptizd ye 17th in her lodging being one m[aste]r Hubberds howse: Shee had bin a souldier by her one confession about 5 years and was som tyme drummer to ye company"

Memo:
Pointing hand in left hand margin. Entry reads: "William Clark son to John Clark a souldier & Thomazine his wife who her selfe went for A Souldier and was billitted at ye 3 hamers in Estsmithfeeld about 7 m[onth]s" **NB** (continues in unrelated memo box)


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 2 August "1654". Either "1654" has been written in error for 1655, or else this entry has been written in later & placed in the wrong year.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 7 December. This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page. Entries begin with date 11 January on the next page. "12" is the numeral for the date in the left margin, but the date of baptism stated in the text of the entry is "22th".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 16 and 18 January. "this was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 26 January. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 30 and 31 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 23 February. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for February. It is written over an erasure.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 9 and 15 February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 16 February. This and the next two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 21 February. This entry and two other entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
This entry and the previous two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 22 March. This and the next two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 8 March on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 3 March. This and two other entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 8 March on the next page.


Memo:
This and the previous two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 8 March on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 27 March. Therefore this is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for March.


Memo:
There is a deleted letter at the start of the address.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 21 April.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page, as entries begin dated 23 April on the next page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 2 May.


Memo:
The address is written as "so[n] y[ar]d" before the dates of birth and baptism and as "so[n] y[ar]d Estsmith[feeld]" after them.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 May. This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 May. This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 23 June. This entry is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page, as entries begin dated 14 June on the next page.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register coming after an entry dated 26 June. "these was neglected to be Registred by ye parents about a weeke" is written in the left hand margin beside them.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register coming after an entry dated 26 June. "these was neglected to be Registred by ye parents about a weeke" is written in the left hand margin beside them.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 29 June. "this was neglected by the parents about a weeke" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 20 June. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 17 and 19 July. "this was neglected about a fortnight" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry and the next three entries at the bottom of the page are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July. "this was neglected by the parents about 3 weekes" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry and three other entries at the bottom of the page are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July. "This was neglected a month" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry and three other entries at the bottom of the page are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July.


Memo:
This entry and the previous three entries at the bottom of the page are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July.


Memo:
The address "tower hill" is written before and after the dates of birth and baptism.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 August 1657. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 16 August.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 26 August at the bottom of the page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text indicates that the date of baptism is 2 September. This entry is written as the final entry of the August entries.


Memo:
In the address "smi[th]" is written above a deletion.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 11 and 16 September.


Memo:
"misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside this entry.


Memo:
"this was neglected to be Registred by the parents therefore misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside this entry. This is the last entry on the page. Entries start with date 23 September on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 27 September. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register and is the last of the entries for September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 19 and 20 October. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry and the next two entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 21 October at the bottom of the page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth and baptism as 10 October. This entry, along with two other entries, is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth and baptism as 6 October. This entry, along with two other entries, is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the next entry there is another entry which has been completely scored out and therefore is illegible. "misplaced" and "14" are written in the left hand margin beside it.


Unrelated_memo:
Between this and the previous entry there is another entry which has been completely scored out and therefore is illegible. "misplaced" and "14" are written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 16 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 18 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 4 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 18 and 16 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 10 December. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 19 January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 19 January. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January.


Memo:
"3 king ally" is deleted at the end of the entry (as the address has already been given before the birth and baptism dates).


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 23 February. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
** NB ** Date of birth is stated to be "29 febr[uary]".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry. The date entered here (for the event and the birth date) is approximate as the entry states that the birth took place "about the middle of this March".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 12 and "about the middle of this" March at the bottom of the page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 4 March. This entry is written out of sequence in the register as the last entries on the previous page are dated later.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 1 April. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register. "misplaced" is written at the end of the entry.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth and baptism as 28 March.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 26 April. "ye parents neglected ye Registring of this Child a moneth" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 4 April. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 26 and 20 April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 9 June. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 12 June.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 June. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 10 June. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 12 and 3 June.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 19 June. It is written out of sequence in the register since entries at the beginning of the next page have earlier dates.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 June. "this Thomas Bullock was by the parents neglected to be Registred and at their Request was after entred in this booke" is in the left margin.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 20 July. "this was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 12 July. "this was neglected by the parents 2 yeares" is written in the left hand margin and the entry is out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
Entry reads: "Margerie a Margretta : Young da[ughter] to Thomas Younge & Dorothy his wife born 22th baptizd 31 minores"
Margerie a[lias] Margretta or two different daughters - Margerie a[nd] Margretta?
Usual format for multiple children has bracket.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 August. "misplaced" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
Duplicate of the previous entry, which is  written in error at the end of the July entries.


Memo:
The date is the date of birth and the baptism took place "a few dayes after".


Memo:
In the address "estsmi" is written as superscript to the right of "Cock ally".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 15 September. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 5 October. "this was neglected 3 weeks" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 October. "this was neglected by the parents" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This and the previous two entries at the bottom of the page are written out of sequence in the register as entries begin with the date 5 October on the next page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 19 and 24 October. "but neglected Registring so[m] .6. day" is written at the end of the entry.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but the date of birth is given as 29 October. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register. ** NB ** "not baptizd"


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October. "14" is the numeral in the left hand margin but the entry states that the baptism took place "the .14th. or .15th. of this october 1656".


Memo:
In the address the "h" of "hart" is written over another "y[ar]d".


Memo:
In the address the first "i" of "bailize" is written above what appears to be a "y" that has been altered from a "p". "baptize" has been altered to "bailize".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 15 November. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November.


Memo:
The address "tower hill" is written above the deletion "Rosmar".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 29 December.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for December.


Memo:
"this was neglected by ye parents 2 months" is written in the left hand margin beside this entry and the next two entries. They are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for August.


Memo:
"this was neglected by ye parents 2 months" is written in the left margin beside this entry and two other entries. There is no numeral for the date, but its text gives the date as 9 August. The three entries are written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
"this was neglected by ye parents 2 months" is written in the left margin beside this entry and the previous two entries. There is no numeral for the date, but the text gives the date of birth as 25 August. The three entries are written out of sequence.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 11 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 18 September. "neglected" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 September. "neglected by the parents" is written in the left margin. This entry is out of sequence in register, coming after entries dated later.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 20 September. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 27 September. **NB** "not baptizd".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 7 and 13 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 14 and 18 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 23 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 October. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register. "neglected to be Registred by ye parents 3 weekes" is in the left margin.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 25 October. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 30 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 28 October. "neglected to be Registred by the parent[es] 8 moneths" is in the left margin. This entry is out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 November. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page, as entries begin dated 6 November on next page.


Memo:
The address "nittengale lane" is written above the deletion "7 star ally".


Memo:
"Esmithfeild" is deleted before the address.


Memo:
This entry is included among the December entries; the numeral for the date in the left margin being "29". However, this is the date of birth. The date of baptism is "3 January" as the text of the entry states.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives date as 14 Dec. "this was neglected by ye parent[es] a month" is written to the left of this and the next entry, both of which are out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives date as 20 Dec. "this was neglected by ye parent[es] a month" is written to the left of this and the previous entry, both of which are out of sequence in the reg.


Memo:
There may be an address at the end of this entry, but, if so, it is illegible because of blotting.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 12 and 14 January. There may be an address at the end of this entry, but, if so, it is illegible because of blotting.


Memo:
"The name of Zacha[ria]h Nocktroff was giuen by m[aste]r Carpenter Churchwarden" is written in the left hand margin beside this entry.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13 January. "these were neglected by ye parents to be Registred about 3 weeks" is written to the left of this and the next entry (which are out of order)


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 26 Jan. "these were neglected by ye parents to be Registred about 3 weeks" is written to the left of this and the previous entry (which are out of order)


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 January. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 1 February.


Memo:
This entry and the remaining entries for February are written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 28 February. "these were neglected by ye parents to be Registred about a weeke" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This entry and four other entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 28 February. "these were neglected by ye parents to be Registred about a weeke" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 February. It is written out of sequence in the register along with four other entries.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 7 February. It is written out of sequence in the register along with the previous four entries.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 10 March. "these were misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside them.


Memo:
"neglected by the parents to be Registred 2 weekes" is written in the left hand margin beside this entry. This entry is written out of sequence at the bottom of the page, as entries begin dated 11 March on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 15 March. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 26 and 28 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 27 March and the date of baptism as 4 April. It is included among the March entries in the register and is therefore written out of order.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 30 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 7 April. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 1 April.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 22 and 25 April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 19 May 1661. The child is described as "3 years old" then and is presumably included here as that was roughly when she was born.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 13 and 16 May. "this was neglected by ye parents foure dayes" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 19 and 22 May.


Unrelated_memo:
Note in left margin: "this Wm Iues was neglected by ye parents to be Registred 2 weekes & Mary Joyce a moneth & An Wells 2 monthes & Israell Haynes 2 month[es] & Elizabeth Ofin 2 monthes"

Memo:
This is one of six entries at the end of May that are out of sequence and without numerals for their dates in the left margin. "this Wm Iues was neglected by ye parents to be Registred 2 weekes" etc is written in the left margin. Date is date of birth.


Memo:
This is one of six entries at the end of May that are out of sequence and without numerals for their dates in the left margin. A note regarding delay of registration is written in the left margin. It includes the statement "Mary Joyce a moneth".


Memo:
This is one of six entries at the end of May that are out of sequence and without numerals for their dates in the left margin. A note regarding delay of registration is written in the left margin. It includes the statement "An Wells 2 monthes".


Memo:
This is one of six entries at the end of May that are out of sequence and without numerals for their dates in the left margin. A note regarding delay of registration is written in the left margin. It includes the statement "Israell Haynes 2 month[es]".


Memo:
This is one of six entries at the end of May that are out of sequence and without numerals for their dates in the left margin. A note regarding delay of registration in the left margin includes the statement "Elizabeth Ofin 2 monthes". Date is birth date.


Memo:
This is one of six entries at the end of May that are out of sequence and without numerals for their dates in the left margin. A note regarding delay of registration is written in the left margin but does not comment on this entry.


Memo:
This is one of three entries that are written out of sequence at the end of the entries for June. None of them has a numeral for the date beside it. "these were neglected by the parents to be Registred a month" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 21 and 24 July. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 29 July. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This is one of three entries that are written out of sequence at the end of the entries for July. None of them has a numeral for the date beside it. "John Weston was neglected to be Registred by ye parents 3 weekes" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This is one of three entries that are written out of sequence at the end of the entries for July. None of them has a numeral for the date beside it.


Memo:
This is one of three entries that are written out of sequence at the end of the entries for July. None of them has a numeral for the date beside it. The date is the date of birth.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 25 and 26 August. "this was neglected by ye parents 4 dayes" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 28 August. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 30 and 31 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 26. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 10 and 3 September (and beginning 11 Sept. on next page).


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 September. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 10 and 26 Sept. (entries begin 11 on next page).


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 23 September. "these were by the parents neglected a month" is written in the margin beside this entry and the next entry (which are out of sequence).


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives date as 27 September. "these were by the parents neglected a month" is written in the margin beside this entry and the previous entry (which are out of sequence).


Memo:
At the end of the entry "Jinings Rents" is deleted and "swan ally" is written above it. The address is also given before the dates of birth and baptism.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 8 October. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 12 and 14 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 16 October. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 28 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 30 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 16 October. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October.


Memo:
"this was neglected by ye parents 5 months" is written in the left hand margin beside this entry.


Memo:
Address may be in two parts. Full entry reads "Edward Allin so[n] to Edward Allin & Joane his wife deceased of w[hi]t Chaple p[ar]ish baptizd ye 26th Rosmary [lane]"


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 17 November, with the baptism taking place "a fortnight after". Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 15 November. "this was neglected to be Regi[stred] by ye parents 4 month[es]" is written in the left hand margin beside it. It is out of sequence.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 4 December. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 26 December. "this was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 17 December. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 26 and 25 December (and 26 Dec. on next page).


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 30 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 29 January. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 24 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 14 January. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 12 February. First word of the address is not certain. It begins "ha".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 6 February. **NB** "not baptized". This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 20 February.


Memo:
"The parents and freinds of these two Children were Anabaptists as we heard but after the mothers of them brought them to Church and desyred our minister to baptize them" is written in the left margin beside this and the next entry.


Memo:
"The parents and freinds of these two Children were Anabaptists as we heard but after the mothers of them brought them to Church and desyred our minister to baptize them" is written in the left margin beside this and the previous entry.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 24 February. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
"this was misplaced" is written in the left margin beside this entry, which comes before entries dated 9 and 10 March.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register and have no numerals for their dates in the left margin. "these two Children were neglected to be Registred by the parents about a fortnight" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register and have no numerals for their dates in the left margin. "these two Children were neglected to be Registred by the parents about a fortnight" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 29 March. "This was neglecte to be Registred by the parents a fortnight" is written in the left hand margin beside it. The start of the address is not certain - "gra"?


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 29 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 30 April. **NB** "not baptized".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 22 May. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register as it is included in the entries for April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 11 April. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 30 May. **NB** "not baptized". Spelling of the address is "miores".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 May. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 4 May. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 25 May. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry but its text gives the date as 9 June. "this was neglected by the parents one weeke" is written in the left margin. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 June. "These were neglected to be Registred by the parents about a month" is written in the left margin beside this and the next two entries.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13 June. "These were neglected to be Registred by the parents about a month" is written in the left margin beside this and two other entries.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 June. "These were neglected to be Registred by the parents about a month" is written in the left margin beside this and the previous two entries.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 June. "This Lawrence Ingolsbie was neglected to be Registred by ye parents and at Request was entred" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 July. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for July.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 July. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 2 July.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 12 July. "this was neglected by the parents about a week" is written in the left margin. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 July. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 17 and 12 July.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 24 July.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 August. "this was neglected to be Registred by ye parents" is written in the left margin. It is written out of sequence in the register.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 27 August. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 26 August. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 31 and 27 August. Address is written on line below.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 31 August. "minores" is written at the end of the line between this and the previous entries - it seems to be the address for the previous entry?


Memo:
The second word of the address is very faded.


Memo:
"The parents Anabaptists" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 September. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 25 September.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 September. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 25 and 20 September.


Memo:
Duplicate of Event ID 22002 (but not identical). There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 September. Therefore it is written out of sequence, coming at the end of the entries for September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 17 October. "this was misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 28 October. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 27 October. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 28 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 14 October. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30, 28 and 27 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 7 October. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 27 and 14 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 27 and 28 November. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 25 November.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 27 November. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 28, 25 and 17 November.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13 December. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register. "misplaced" is written in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
In the address "yard" is deleted between "hary" and "ally".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13 December. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 18 Dec. "misplased" is written in the left margin.


Memo:
This is one of four entries written at the end of the December entries that have no numerals for their dates in the left margin beside them. "these were neglected to be Registred by ye parents and after at their Request was entred" is in the left margin.


Memo:
This is one of four entries written at end of the Dec. entries that have no numerals for their dates in the left margin. "these were neglected to be Registred by ye parents and after at their Request was entred" is in left margin. Date is date of birth.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 21 January. "misplaced" is written in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives date as 15 January. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 21 and 17 January. "neglected a month" is in the left margin.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 5 February. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming before an entry dated 1 February.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 12 February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 12 February. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 29 February 1659.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 February. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 2 March. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming between two entries dated 1 March.


Memo:
This entry is the first on the page and is included among the entries for March 1659/60. However, it states that the subject was "born ye 11th. & baptizd ye 18 of this January".  "January" may have been written in error instead of "March"?


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 April. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 14 May. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 20 May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 May. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 20 and 14 May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 29 May. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 May.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 10 June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 19 June. "this was Misplaced" is written in the left margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 August. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 8 August. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 9 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 7 August. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 21 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 12 August. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 21 and 7 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 21 September. **NB** "not baptizd"


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 5 October. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 October. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 5 and 4 October.


Memo:
The numeral for the date in the left margin beside this entry is "3". However, this is the date of birth. The date of baptism is 22 October. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 5, 4 & 21 Oct. and before 9 Oct.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 8 October. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October. They have no numerals for their dates in the left margin, but "this was neglected by the parents on month" is written in the margin.


Memo:
This entry & the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October. They have no numerals for their dates in the left margin, but "this was neglected by the parents on month" is written in the margin.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 2 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 1 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 31 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 11 December. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before an entry dated 2 January. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 4 January. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 25 January.


Memo:
Duplicate of Event ID 22445, with the only exceptions being that the occupation is given for the father in this entry and there is a minor difference in the spelling of the father's surname.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 12 January. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 30 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 January. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 12 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 27 January. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30, 12 and 21 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 January. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 11 February. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 21 February.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 8 March. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 11 March. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 3 March.


Memo:
** NB ** Date is date of birth. "not baptizd"


Memo:
In the address the second "w" of "wentworth" is written over an "f".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 March. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 March 1661.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 26 March. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for March 1660/1.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 2 April. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 3 April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 14 April. This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 7 April on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 14 April. This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 7 April on the next page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 22 April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 April. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 3 May. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for May.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 19 May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13 May. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry and no mention of the date in the text of the entry itself. It is written at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 19 June. Therefore this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 June.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 25 June. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 July. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 12 July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 23 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 2 September. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 1 September.


Memo:
Address is written as "tower his" - presumably an error instead of "tower hill".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 12 September. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 19 September.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 15 September. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 19 and 12 September.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 September. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 30 September.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 September. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 21 September.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 12 September. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for September.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 October. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 13 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, and its text does not give a date either. It is written after an entry dated 27 October and before an entry dated 17 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 17 October. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 19 November. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November. **NB** Cf Event ID 22778


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 8 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 December. It is one of four entries of the same date which are written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 29 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 22 December. It is one of four entries of the same date which are written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 29  December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 27 December. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 20 December. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 31 and 27 December.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 20 January. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 5 January and before an entry dated 12 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of birth as 12 January. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 5 and 20 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 January. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 30 January.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 24 January. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 10 January.


Memo:
There are no numerals for the dates in the left hand margin beside this entry and the next entry, but their texts provide the dates. "neglected by the parents to be Registred a month" is written in the left hand margin beside them.


Memo:
There are no numerals for the dates in the left hand margin beside this entry and the previous entry, but their texts provide the dates. "neglected by the parents to be Registred a month" is written in the left hand margin beside them.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 21 March. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 23 March.


Memo:
There is a minim short in the first word of the address. The address is written above the deletion "swan ally".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 13 March. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 and 23 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 23 March. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30, 23 and 13 March.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 6 April. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 16 April.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 4 May. Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for May.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 12 June.Therefore it is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 28 July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 30 September. "this was neglected by ye parent a fortnight to be Registred" is written beside it (and the next entry) in the left margin.


Unrelated_memo:
The marginal comment may only apply to the previous entry rather than this entry as well.

Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 30 September. "this was neglected by ye parent a fortnight to be Registred" is written in the left margin beside this entry and the previous entry.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 11 October. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 30 October.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 18 October. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October.


Memo:
"Esmith[feild]" is deleted at the end of the entry.


Memo:
Regarding the date "22" is written over "16" in the left hand margin. Another "22" is also written to the left of this.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 21 January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for January. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 5 February. This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 20 February. Address is not certain.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 10 March. "misplaced" is written in the left hand margin beside it.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 9 March. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 22 March.


Memo:
The numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry has been altered from "21" to "22".


Memo:
"swan ally" is deleted before the address.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written before an entry dated 1 June in the register. This entry appears to be written in different ink from the next entry.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written before an entry dated 1 June in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 4 and 5 June.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 16 July. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the bottom of the page after an entry dated 25 July.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, nor does its text give a date. It is written between two entries dated 29 July. Accordingly it has been assigned that date here.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the start of the entries for August.


Memo:
This entry and the next two entries are probably related, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry, the previous entry and the next entry are probably related, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry and the previous two entries are probably related, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for November after an entry dated 30 November.


Memo:
There is a deleted letter at the end of the address.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry may be related, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry may be related, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 21 and 24 April.


Memo:
This entry may be related to the next entry, but no indication is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry may be related to the previous entry, but no indication is given in the register.


Memo:
"Rosm[ary]" is deleted before the address, "nitt".


Memo:
Address is written as "morles Morles Rents" in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 14 and 15 February.


Unrelated_memo:
The wrong year is stated in the heading for the April entries on this page, i.e. "Aprill :- 1664" instead of 1665.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "squirrilly ally".


Memo:
Regarding the address, there appears to be a very faint trace of "ally" after "haro".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 30 July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for July. It is written in a different hand from the rest of the entries on the page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 4 August.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, nor does its text give the date. It is written after four entries dated 20 August and before one dated 23 August. The approximate date 20 August has been assigned to it here.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 31 August.


Unrelated_memo:
To the right of this entry and the remaining three entries for September is written "In this sad tyme of visitation notice may be taken that the Register has not Accoumpt of many that were borne"


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 29 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 20 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 15, 20 and 8 October.


Memo:
In the address the last letter of "haro" is written over a "y". Therefore "hary" has been altered to "haro".


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 12 and 16 November.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 12 and 16 November.


Memo:
If there is an address at the end of the entry, it is illegible.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 29 December.


Memo:
This entry is written in different ink (and possibly hand) from the other entries on the page.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 29 June.


Memo:
Address is written as "hownsdch" (no superscript used at end).


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 August. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for August.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 13 and 14 September.


Memo:
"Esmithfeeld" is deleted before the address, "haro ally".


Memo:
This entry is written in a different hand at the bottom of the page. It is out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 18 Oct. and before an entry dated 19 Oct. on the next page. This is an almost identical duplicate of Event ID 24876.


Unrelated_memo:
The hand changes at this point in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 28 and 30 October.


Unrelated_memo:
From this point on in the register, the clerk does not put a numeral in the left margin beside every entry (as was the case - in most instances - with the previous clerk).


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "Eastmithfeild".


Memo:
There is a deleted "M" before the address.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register at the bottom of the page, as entries begin dated 20 January on the next page.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 10 February.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 20 and 21 February.


Memo:
NB Date is the date of birth. The baptism subject was "born ye .12th. of this march & baptized a fortnight after".


Memo:
In the address the descender of the "g" is very faint.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 24 March.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 28 and 29 March.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 28 and 29 March.


Memo:
This entry is possibly related to the next one, but no indication is given of this in the register.


Memo:
This entry is possibly related to the previous entry, but no indication is given of this in the register.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 16 and 20 June.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 25 and 29 June.


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date of baptism as 27 June. It is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for June.


Memo:
This entry is possibly related to the next one, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
This entry is possibly related to the previous one, but no indication of this is given in the register.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "st Kathins lane".


Memo:
There is no numeral for the date in the left hand margin beside this entry, but its text gives the date as 7 July.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 22 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 25 and 26 September.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after an entry dated 14 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 20 and 21 October.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries dated December.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming after entries dated 27 January.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for February.


Memo:
NB This entry is incomplete as most of it has been omitted from the photograph.


Memo:
Address is written as "Estsmith Estsmithfeild".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming before entries dated 4 and 5 August.


Memo:
Date is 15 August. This entry and the next four entries predate the previous entry.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 21 and 22 August.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 30 December.


Memo:
Presumably the date is 15 April. It looks as if the clerk may have started to write another date in the left hand margin, but then scored it out.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "Hounds dich".


Memo:
In the address there is a minim missing in "hill".


Unrelated_memo:
The next page (p. 204) of the manuscript is blank and then entries begin again, in a different hand, on p. 205 from 24 February. Therefore there seems to be a gap in the records.


Unrelated_memo:
The previous page (p. 204) of the manuscript is blank and then entries begin again, in a different hand, on this page from 24 February. Therefore there seems to be a gap in the records.


Memo:
In the date the "5" is written over "4".


Memo:
Date is not certain. Could be 3 or 5 October.


Memo:
Date is difficult to read. It appears to be 26 October, in which case this entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for October. Possible duplicate of Event ID 29555.


Memo:
The numeral for the date in the left margin has been altered from "22" to "21".


Memo:
There are a couple of words scored out after the address.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "Woolack ally".


Memo:
Spelling of "hounsislow" in address is not certain.


Memo:
This is an entry for twins. However, there are two numerals for the date beside it in the left margin. "20" is written beside the name of the first twin, while "21" is written beside the name of the second twin.


Memo:
The date of this entry and the next entry is 19 May. These entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 29 and 30 May.


Memo:
The date of this entry and the previous entry is 19 May. These entries are written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 29 and 30 May.


Memo:
Address is written as "Shipbrewhow feilds".


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming at the end of the entries for August. It is written in a different hand and ink, and the date is the date of birth.


Memo:
In the left margin the numeral for the date has been altered from "15" to "11".


Memo:
In the address "end" is written below "row".


Memo:
"King" is scored out before the address.


Memo:
In the address "lane" is written above the last three letters of "Petticote".


Memo:
End of address is difficult to read - but probably "wins" rather than "man".


Memo:
In the address "Gunn" appears to be written over "Grauill".


Memo:
In the address "lane" is written above "gall".


Memo:
This entry has been cut off in the photograph (apart from the first word - which is the forename "ffrances").


Memo:
The second half of this entry is not visible because it has been cut off from the photograph.


Memo:
The address cannot be seen fully because it has been cut off from the bottom of the photograph. It may read "houns Ditch".


Memo:
Address is possibly "Est smith feild" but it has been cut off from the bottom of the photograph.


Memo:
Only the top part of the address is visible as the rest is cut off from the photograph.


Memo:
There is a minim missing in the address.


Unrelated_memo:
"1676:" is underlined and written in the left hand margin beside this entry.


Memo:
In the address the "n" is not properly formed.


Unrelated_memo:
"1677:" (underlined) is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Unrelated_memo:
There is a (squashed!) pointing hand in the left margin beside this entry.


Memo:
This entry is written out of sequence in the register, coming between entries dated 28 October.


Unrelated_memo:
Heading at the top of this page is "January :- 1677/8 :- Burialls".


Unrelated_memo:
Heading for February entries is for 1677/8.


Unrelated_memo:
The heading for the March entries gives date as 1677/8.


Memo:
In the address the ascender of the "d" is not visible.


Unrelated_memo:
"1678" (underlined) is written in the left hand margin beside this entry. However, there is no numeral for the day to indicate that the date is 25 March or later.

Memo:
"1678" (underlined) is written in the left hand margin beside this entry. However, there is no numeral for the day to indicate that the date is 25 March or later. The previous numeral is "24", the next is "26". "25" has been entered as a guess.


Memo:
The end of the entry has been cut off from the photograph. Thus (probably) the parent's name and address are not visible.


Unrelated_memo:
"March - . 79 ." is written in the left margin beside this entry. ". 79 ." is underlined.


Memo:
In the address "Coleman streete" is written above "st Stephens". "^" is at the end of the line after "st Stephens".


Memo:
Possibly a duplicate of the previous entry.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "Estmith feild".


Unrelated_memo:
Most pages for 1580s entries have "//-" symbols in right margin. These appear to be filler and appear next to every entry unless otherwise stated.

Address:
in the towne of Rye in the county of sussix


Memo:
occupation: not certain whether merchant goes with father or son; 19/2/09: Phil confirmed more likely to be father


Memo:
date: originally "13" but struck out and replaced with "xv" in MS


Memo:
this entry says it is a baptism not a burial, but has been entered in the burial register. No mention of death or burial.

Address:
dwelling at [th]e signe of the flushing in theast smythfeeld


Memo:
relationship: "mother of the wife of thomas estridge"


Memo:
relationship: MS does not state servant, only says "water clarck to mr anthony duffeld bruer"


Address:
of suffock who dyed in an Inne called the bel in [th]e hye street


Address:
of the townne of flushing who dyed at anngel anthony his hows


Memo:
duplicate of final entry on previous page


Memo:
date uncertain as obscured by bleed from other side but looks most like "22"


Unrelated_memo:
Beneath this entry: "Here is to be noted that I Robart heaz curat of this church vnder hir m[ajesty] beganne in my seruice the 14. Of Julye anno 1564 frome the w[hi]ch tyme & daye vntill the 18 of the p[_]sent June Anno 1581 I haue buryed 2722 RH"; in left margin: "here is to be noted that this nomber was collected by me the said robart heaz in the twenty three yer[\] of our quenes ma[jes]t[\] Raignne whom god preserue"


Memo:
date: appears to be out of order as previous event is 12 July


Memo:
occupation: "clarck controler of hir ma[jes]t[\] greennecloth" not clear if this relates to father or son; 19/2/09: Phil confirms more likely to be father


Address:
dwelling at the Posternne neare the tower of london


Memo:
name: forename blank in margin; space for name and relationship left blank in entry


Memo:
address: "who dyed in peter young[\] howse at [th]e tower hil by James crew"


Memo:
date: "december" struck out and replaced with november


Memo:
this entry in slightly different hand; name in left margin highlighted with cross hatching; main entry highlighted with double lines


Memo:
"Cristened" struck out and replaced with "buryed"


Memo:
relationship/occupation: not clear which brother is the apprentice


Unrelated_memo:
symbols in right margin stop from here on

Memo:
name in margin highlighted with cross hatching


Memo:
possible strangers but not explicitly stated


Address:
out of the crownne neare vnto this church


Unrelated_memo:
"//-" symbols reappear in right margin on this page


Address:
vp[_], in Jhon Willis howsse in hownnsdich


Memo:
date: does not say "anno predicto" after august, but right margin gives "158" (final digit cut off edge of page) instead of usual filler symbol


Memo:
entry has large blank space between "Jhon king" and "was Buryed"


Address:
vp[_], dwelling in old father henry brownnes Rent[\] neare the mineris


Address:
east, out of the quennes ma[jes]t[\] howsse in theastsmithfyeld


Address:
vp[_], in the howsse of Will[/]m sharp hownsdich


Memo:
"baptized" struck out and replaced with "buryed"


Address:
vp[_], dwelling of auntient tyme in the hye street


Memo:
date: appears to be out of order or wrong in MS


Unrelated_memo:
under this entry: "Here is to be noted that I Robart Heaz curat of this church vnder her Ma[jes]t[\] from the 18 of June 1581 vntill the 21 of November 1582 haue buryed 366 so that in the hole from the 14 of July 1564 vntill the foresaid daie 21 nove[-]ber 1582"; in right margin: "3088 RH"


Memo:
appears to be duplicate of record 525 but with more detail

Address:
Dwelling within sainct mary grace all[/]s the quennes ma[jes]t[\] storehowsse on the tower hill


Unrelated_memo:
symbol in right margin slightly different from others


Unrelated_memo:
date: jumps from 31 Dec on previous page to 5 Jan at start of this page

Memo:
status: not clear which one is cooper/stranger


Memo:
occupation: not sure which one is the mariner


Address:
dwelling in the shipp aley by the Myneris


Memo:
cause of death: not clear if plague applies to one or both children


Address:
east, dwelling in essix who dyed in the howsse of thomas wilson


Address:
east, dyed in Jhon bakers howsse at the signe of the hatchet


Memo:
address: "east" struck out and replaces with "vp[_]"


Address:
dwelling at barking in essix & dyed in the howse of Jhon willis in hownsdiche


Memo:
"Buryed with his dawghter both in one graue togither": both added as subjects and not related persons


Unrelated_memo:
date: jumps from 31 Jul at end of previous page to 12 Aug at start of this page but images are clearly facing pages so no images missing


Memo:
right margin: "1584" instead of usual filler symbols


Memo:
relationship: uncertain whether father or daughter is servant, MS gives: "dawghter vnto Richard otuwel & seruaunt to Richard warde a goldsmith", margin gives "a criso[-]"


Address:
vp[_], who dyed in the howsse of Jhon Robart[\] in the shipp alley


Unrelated_memo:
beneth this entry in left margin: "I haue buryed in the whole since I came to [thi]s p[_]rishe ending the 24 of marche 1584 the nomber of //3642// RH"


Address:
vp[_], who dyed in the howsse of arnold langhame barber surgeaunt neare the mineris


Memo:
name highlighted in left margin; in main entry: "they lyued maryed togither in godly Loue 47 yers no dowt to gods glory"; does not explicitly state that either was a stranger

Address:
Eastsmithfyeld, Dwelling neare the cornerhowsse going downne the yron gat of the tower


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry in left margin: "Rheaz"

Memo:
highlighted in left margin with double lines


Memo:
date: does not say anno predicto, but "1585" entered in right margin in place of filler symbols


Memo:
something deleted and illegible in left margin before name


Address:
east, who deceassed in the signne of the flower deluce


Memo:
address: "east" struck out and replaced with "vp[_]"


Address:
east, who dyed out of the spread ealge of the eastsmithfyeld & was newly arryved on shoer out of a shipp called the minion of london


Address:
dwelling at the posternne neare the tower of London


Memo:
several names in this entry were originally same as previous entry but have been struck out and replaced with new ones; age and cause of death have possibly been copied from previous entry by mistake


Address:
vp[_], who dyed in [th]e whitbell of the high street


Unrelated_memo:
first 6 entries on this page have different symbols in right margin, then back to normal for rest of page


Memo:
illegible mark on left, possibly address


Address:
vp[_], who dyed at the crownne without algat adioyninge to the p[_]rishe church


Unrelated_memo:
under this entry: "p[_] Ro. Heaz curatu[-] 1586"


Memo:
date: "aprill" struck out and replaced with "maye"

Address:
frome [th]e fludeluce o[-] [th]e towerhill


Unrelated_memo:
symbols in right margin change to "/-/" for first 11 entries on this page, then back to "//-"


Memo:
margin highlighted with cross hatching and initialled "RH"


Memo:
left margin highlighted with cross hatching and initialled "RH"; right margin initialled "RH" above "//-" symbol


Memo:
left margin highlighted underneath with cross hatching


Memo:
date: out of order; entry highlighted in left margin


Unrelated_memo:
under this entry at bottom of page: "Rheaz"


Memo:
much of entry obscured by bleed from other side: surname unclear, possible address and occupation given but illegible


Memo:
mentions deceased had wife and 3 children but not named so not added as related people; no mention of burial: 23 May is date he was hanged on gibbet


Memo:
date obscured by bleed from other side but probably 8 July


Unrelated_memo:
written above this entry: "Frome the forteenne daie Of July Anno 1564 vntill the 30 daie off Awgust in Anno 1588 I Robart heaz curat of sainct buttolls without algat haue buryed the ful nomber of 4379"; margin to left of this note and entry below has a drawing featuring a cross design and a face


Memo:
entry obscured by bleed: date unceratin, something illegible in left margin


Memo:
entry badly obscured by bleed; names and age uncertain


Memo:
date very hard to read but looks similar to 9 in entry below


Memo:
date: does not say "anno predicto" but has "1588" in right margin


Unrelated_memo:
under this entry in left margin: drawn pattern incorporating "RH" and "1588"


Address:
vp[_], dwelling in woole sack alley in hte hie street


Memo:
date: "the 31 of march being the easter mondaie"


Unrelated_memo:
unidentified abbreviations in left margin


Address:
vp[_], dwelling in the woole sack alley in the highe street


Address:
vp[_], out of the gardins in crossegonne aley in the hie street


Unrelated_memo:
note in margin hard to read, possibly "my supperkin"

Memo:
"[th]e names of those goodfelowes [tha]t carrid hir corps to the grave are these" [names given, entered as related people] "shoomakers dwelling in [th]e duchery & in sainct m[c]tin in [th]e field[\] p[_]rishe"


Memo:
appears to be duplicate of event 2128 but not all details match


Memo:
probably duplicate of event 2131 but details confused


Address:
Lodging in Cocke Alley in east smithfeild


Address:
hownsditch in [th]e Flouer de luce Court


Address:
of the same precynct [ie the precynct next Tower Hill]


Memo:
in right margin covering this and next 5 entries: "Theise Six (being all Children) were Buryed the fiue & twentith day"


Memo:
in left margin: drawing of hand with finger pointing to this entry


Address:
in the Bridgehouse Rent[\] beyond [th]e Mynoryes


Memo:
this entry is entirely in right margin with an asterisk above it


Address:
in the same Alley [ie Three kinges Alley neere the Mynoryes]


Memo:
not clear if lodging applies to father, daughter, or both.


Memo:
date of burial unclear, could be 6th or 7th, see comment.


Memo:
twins: MS states this is a twin but apparently only one was buried


Address:
of the same libertye [ie east smithfeild]


Address:
late of east smithfeild in [th]e Barbour surgions rent[\]


Memo:
not clear if "deceased" refers to father or date of death


Memo:
not clear if wife/mother died and was buried


Memo:
relationship unclear, MS gives "Griszell Bryan dwelling Leonard Hemington in swan Alley"


Memo:
no date given, previous entry is 16th, next is 19th


Memo:
entry struck out, note in right margin: "this was mistaken"


Memo:
in right margin next to this and following entry: "In the Night"


Memo:
in right margin next to this and previous entry: "In the Night"


Memo:
in left margin: drawing of skull and scroll bering motto "Omnia tempus habent"


Memo:
drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this entry


Address:
dwelling in the same alley [ie Pond Alley]


Memo:
date: very hard to read, could be 15th or 16th

Address:
in Hogg lane neere the Barres without Aldgate


Memo:
note in right margin covering this and next 3 entries: "Theis foure Children were Buryed the first Day of October 1612"


Memo:
date: main entry says "the Fourteenth day" but note in right margin says: "Christned [th]e 14 day & buryed the 17 day"


Memo:
date: "[th]e same day", could mean 14th or 17th, see memo to previous and next entry


Memo:
date: "the said xiiij th day", see memos to previous 2 entries


Address:
lodgeing in Cock alley in east smithfeild


Memo:
unidentified abbreviation in right margin


Memo:
hand drawn in left margin with finger pointing to this entry


Address:
within the Red gate beyond [th]e Mynoryes


Memo:
note in left margin: "This Thomas Guest and his wife were Executed at Tyborne for the Death of the said Susan, the 9 day of August, 1613"


Address:
neere the Tower ditch in east smithfeild


Address:
east smithfeild, in [th]e Barbours Rent[\]


Memo:
There is a duplicate of this entry struck out after the next entry


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, arrow in left margin pointing from this entry to space before previous entry


Memo:
date: 20 something, can't see rest of it


Unrelated_memo:
drawing of skull and hourglass in left margin


Memo:
date: something else struck out and replaced with 20th


Unrelated_memo:
small cross in left margin between this and next entry


Memo:
date: very hard to read; originally thought was 25th


Memo:
date: heading gives "Anno Domini 1515" but have assumed should be 1615


Unrelated_memo:
Below this entry: "On the Eighteenth day of this Moneth of April Anno 1615 the new Churchyard or Buriall place in Rosemarie Street, (being in the Libertie of Eastsmithfeild) was Consecrated by the Reuerend Father in God, John, Lord Bishoppe of London, and the first that were Buried there, were theise three next Following"; drawing of skull in left margin next to this note


Address:
who kept the Queenes head Taverne in East smithfeild


Unrelated_memo:
drawing of skull and hourglass in right margin


Memo:
date hard to read, could be 27th or 28th


Memo:
date: out of order in MS, line in left margin pointing from this entry to before previous entry


Memo:
date: 29 Feb 1615; drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this entry


Address:
blew Anchor alley neere [th]e Tower hill


Memo:
date: out of order, note in margin: "This should haue bene sett before"


Memo:
date: main entry gives 4th July but note in left margin: "This buriall was the Seaventh day"


Memo:
drawing of skull in right margin with scroll bearing motto: "viuit post funera..." (rest illegible)

Address:
of the Parish of All Hallowes in Bredstreete


Memo:
drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this entry; drawing of skull and hourglass in right margin; at end of entry: "Beati Misericordes, quoniam ipsi misericordiam consequentur. Matth.5.7."


Address:
Brownes Alley in the same street [ie the Minories street]


Address:
dwelling among the Gardens neere hounsditch


Address:
who dwelt among the Gardens neere hounsditch


Address:
of the Barbours Rent[\] in East smithfeild


Address:
Dwelt neere wollsack alley in Hounsditch


Memo:
this entry written entirely in left margin with drawing of pointing hand above


Address:
at the signe of three Mariners in East smithfeild


Unrelated_memo:
drawing in left margin, can't tell what it is


Memo:
possible error in MS with relationship: "Susanne Thomas wife to Robert Thomas Compass maker & Margret his wife", have entered as given


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, note in margin: "this was overslipt"?


Memo:
Drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this entry


Memo:
Note in right margin covering this and next 4 entries: "Theise five Children were Buried (also) the Nineteenth day"


Address:
the King[\] Storehouse in East smithfeild


Address:
dwelt in the Libertie of East smithfeild


Memo:
date: "buried about [th]e xxij th day", very hard to read, could be "xxiij"


Address:
of the same Libertie [ie East smitfeild]


Address:
at the King[\] Storehouse in East smithfeild


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "was buried, the day before, the xxvj th day"


Address:
in the same street [ie the Minories street]


Address:
dwelt in the Bridge house Rent[\] beyond the Minories


Memo:
this entry entirely in left margin, note above: "Overslipt"


Memo:
date: heading at top of page gives Jan 1621 but previous page said Jan 1620 and this page continues with Feb 1620


Memo:
date: apparently entered out of order but no explanation given in MS


Address:
of the same Libertie [ie East smithfeild]


Address:
the signe of [th]e Crowne without Aldgate


Memo:
note in right margin covering this and next three entries: "Theise 4 Children were Buried (also) the Thirtieth day"


Memo:
date: incomplete, looks like was was probably going to be 7th but not sure


Address:
of the same street [ie the Minories street]


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS "buried [th]e day before, [th]e xxiiij th day"


Memo:
something illegible in right margin under "house"


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "was buried the sixt day of this Moneth, and by oversight placed here"


Address:
of the Parish of Saint Olaves in Hartstreet


Address:
of the same Alley [ie Bell Alley neere the Tower hill]


Unrelated_memo:
Under this entry: "Here Beginneth the yeare of our Lord, 1623. The 25 day of March" with drawing of pointing hand in left margin


Memo:
date: very hard to read, could be 17th or 18th


Memo:
date incomplete: "buried the El"; following entry gives "buried (also) the Twelft day"


Address:
dwelt in the High street without Aldgate


Address:
of the same libertie [ie East smithfeild]


Unrelated_memo:
drawing of skull in left margin below this entry next to month heading


Address:
of the Tower Libertie (somtime of our parish


Unrelated_memo:
"There are verie few Children prosper long in our Parish that are Nursed in such Places"


Unrelated_memo:
illegible deleted entry below this,  note in margin: "this was Mistaken"


Address:
dwelt in the high street without Aldgate


Memo:
date: MS gives "buried also the xxiiij th day" but previous entry is definitely "xxiij"


Address:
at [th]e signe of the Flishing in East smithfeild


Address:
dwelt in the parishes Rentes without Aldgate


Memo:
Date very hard to read, might be 26 but looks more like 27


Memo:
date: 5th erased and replaced with 6th; drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this entry


Memo:
date illegible: could be 28 or 29, but date following this group is "(also) the Nyne & twentieth day"


Memo:
date: entered out of order in very small writing at end of month


Memo:
incomplete entry at bottom of page (CIMG5764), no date but under month heading for April 1625


Memo:
this entry entirely in left margin, note: "overslipt"


Memo:
date: very faded, could be 23 or 24, but following entry says "(also) the xxiiij th day"


Unrelated_memo:
hand changes here, gets much harder to read


Memo:
date very hard to read, looks like 27 or 28 but that doesn't fit with sequence


Memo:
date very hard to read, looks like 27 or 28 but that doesn't fit with sequence; can't read address


Address:
dwelt in the same Alley [ie Swann Alley]


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry: "Martha" then rest of line blank


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry: "Arthur" then rest of line blank


Memo:
"Thomas Wales his boy was buryed", not sure if this means Thomas Wales is the boy of Robert Young in previous, or it's a nameless boy belonging to Thomas Wales


Unrelated_memo:
under this entry: "Tiptoes", rest of line blank


Memo:
"Richard Ball labourer and Elizabeth his wife were buryed"


Address:
in the same place [ie seven starre yard]


Address:
in the same place or streete [ie in the minorites streete]


Memo:
possibly has second unnamed subject but ambiguous: "Robert Bradbury and [blank space] Bradbury [blank space] to Bradbury Joyner was buryed"


Address:
neere the same place [ie Salemon Seabrights house]


Memo:
"victuler", can't tell if this refers to son, father or mother


Unrelated_memo:
under this entry: "servt to Samuell Avis" in middle of line, not sure if this is separate incomplete entry or refers to this entry


Unrelated_memo:
this whole page has no dates in margin, have assumed they are all 21st following on from previous page but entries for 22nd on following page are very few in comparison


Memo:
address: was originally "high streete" but "high" has been crossed out and replaced with something illegible, possibly Mynories


Memo:
"barbersurgio[-]": not sure if this is occupation of mother or son, or part of address


Memo:
date: under heading "February" but no day number in margin


Address:
from the Marchantailors Almosehouse tow[e]r hill


Memo:
"both in one coffin"; "twins" crossed out and replaced with "son & daughter"


Memo:
date: month not given in MS for whole of this month but have assumed June


Memo:
not clear if both chrisoms and infants, or one of each


Memo:
illegible word at end of line after "uxor"


Memo:
date: no dates given for any March entries, only month and year headings


Memo:
date: apparently entered out of sequence but no explanation in MS


Memo:
"new churchyard", not sure if this is address or burial location


Memo:
occupation: "weaver" at end of line, not clear who it refers to


Memo:
"slayne in East:", not sure if this is residence or place of death


Memo:
not clear if father or daughter is servant


Address:
foundlinge in St Denys Back=church p[_]she


Memo:
related person not named: "so[-] to" then rest of line blank


Memo:
illegible word at end of line, possibly address "myneries"


Memo:
date: entered out of sequence in MS, no explanation given


Memo:
can't read last word of entry, could be address or cause of death


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, no reason given


Memo:
"so[-] to the said William & Margret Attkinson" see previous event


Memo:
"so[-] also to the said Will[/]m & Margaret Attkinson" see previous 2 events


Memo:
"daught[e]r also to the saied Thomas and Margaret", see previous event


Memo:
date: with entries for 1st but looks like "buried the second day" at end of line


Memo:
occupation: not clear whether father, mother or son is the cook


Memo:
date: entered out of order and not exact, "was buried about the 14th daie of this moneth of November"


Memo:
unidentified word or symbol at end of line


Unrelated_memo:
aligment of dates in left margin ambiguous from 6th to 14th


Memo:
date: number in left margin next to Elizabeth, possibly "3" but very faded, possibly been erased


Memo:
date: "24" repeated in margin, possibly altered to or from something else


Memo:
date: "5" repeated in margin after previous entry for 6th


Memo:
date: number written in left margin but partly erased and illegible


Memo:
not burial: "this was a [christ]ining (mistakn)"


Memo:
date: number given in left margin but appears to have been deleted and is illegible


Memo:
date: apparently entered out of order in MS, margin gives "13" but no explanation


Memo:
date: no numbers given from here until 4th


Memo:
date: no number given at start of this page; have assumed same date as previous entry


Memo:
this and/or previous event could be baptism: looks like "bap" written in right margin between them


Memo:
address very hard to read, final word illegible


Memo:
final word looks like "har" or "hac", not sure what it is


Memo:
unidentified word or symbol in right margin


Memo:
date: "7" repeated in left margin by this entry


Memo:
"Chri" in left margin: could be chrisom, or baptism not  burial


Memo:
"in Hounsditche" could be address or place of death


Memo:
end of line obscured, might be address but can't see it


Memo:
address very hard to read, last word illegible


Memo:
end of line illegible, probably mother's name and/or address


Memo:
date very hard to read but looks like 5th


Memo:
not sure about address, very hard to read


Memo:
end of line illegible, possibly includes address


Memo:
end of line illegible, probably includes address


Memo:
rest of line illegible, possibly includes address and/or second related person


Memo:
can't read final character of address, could be ":" or "s"


Memo:
address on line below but assumed it belongs to this event


Memo:
address illegible, possibly "Jenings rents"


Memo:
address illegible, possibly "hie street"


Memo:
last word of address illegible, possibly "Est"


Address:
longe Alley in Lenard Shoreditche p[_]ishe


Memo:
last word of address probably Smithfield but not sure of exact spelling


Memo:
address very hard to read, possibly another word at end


Memo:
rest of address illegible, possibly "hie street"


Address:
in Marchantaylors Almes houses towre hill


Memo:
address/residence very complicated, not sure I've got right people in right places


Memo:
address very faded, possibly partly erased


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; address: illegible, possibly "minoris"


Memo:
can't read address, possibly "red lion aly"


Address:
out of Angell alley in Bottolphe Bishopsgate p[_]ishe


Memo:
address: "harowe ally" struck out and replaced by "minoris"


Memo:
not sure of date or what kind of event this is: "Hester Joanes daughter to Richard Joans & An his wife was [end of line here, possibly missing word] the 29 of this march 1646 and at their Request was Registred"


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry: "Heare Mr Morhouse that was Clerke left"


Memo:
address: "still ally" struck out and replaced with "gravell lane"


Memo:
address: illegible (possibly deleted) word before "est end"


Memo:
address: "Est end" struck out and replaces with "Seedland court"


Memo:
date: entered out of order; baptism but in burial register: "was baptized at Newington the 14 day of this Aprill as the parentes affirme and their Requests was Registred here being parishioners"


Memo:
date entered out of order; entry partly erased


Memo:
drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this (or next?) entry


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; "this was misplaced"


Memo:
address: "buried" struck out then "in 3 kinge ally"


Memo:
last word of line illegible: address or part of burial location?


Memo:
date: appears to be date of death not burial


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "this was misplaced"


Address:
from white hard Court in white Chappell p[_]ish


Address:
browght out of gravell Lane in stepney p[_]ish


Memo:
address: altered to "woolsack ally" from something else


Memo:
number of subjects: MS gives "Crezumes three twines daughters", not sure if this means 2 or 3


Memo:
illegible word at end of line; drawing of hand in left margin with finger pointing to this entry


Address:
from [th]e signe of [th]e Hanborough Est end


Memo:
address: "[th]e wheele in" struck out before "Morles Rents"


Memo:
something illegible in left margin, possibly change of date


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "buried [th]e 18th day but misplaced"


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "misplased"


Address:
from [th]e Amsterdam near [th]e Armitage


Address:
from Kathrine wheele ally bishops gat street


Memo:
address: "end" struck out and replaced with "smith"


Address:
browght from mylend greene wt Chapell p[_]ish


Memo:
not sure who "lodger" should apply to as written near end of entry


Address:
brought from stone Cutters y[ar]d in gravell lane


Memo:
date: has been altered in MS, could be 7 or 8


Address:
from the said 3 nuns [in the high street]


Address:
browght out of Mayden head court by london wall


Address:
dwelling in wt Chappell p[_]ish Rosma[-]: lane


Memo:
date: note at end of line, hard to read but looks like "her funerall was the 11 August"


Memo:
not sure if "wt Chapell p[_]ish" is part of address or burial location


Memo:
deleted word to right of entry, also some unidentified symbols


Memo:
address: "tower hill" struck out and replaced with "minores"


Memo:
duplicate + crossed out: "this man was taken up againe and buried in this Church y[ar]d [th]e 23"; event has been re-entered in MS under 23/11


Memo:
marks above this line, could be illegible superscript or blotted ink from facing page


Memo:
address: "Condit yar" struck out and replaced with "Minores"


Memo:
burial location: something else crossed out and replaced with "bishopsgate p[_]ish"


Memo:
unidentified symbol at end of line, possibly crossed out


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "these two were misplaced"


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, "misplaced"


Address:
from [th]e dogs head in [th]e pot in East smithfeild


Memo:
address: "hownsditch" crossed out and replaced with "haro ally"


Memo:
address: "ship ally" crossed out and replaced with "minores"


Address:
from [th]e flower deluce shipbrewers feilds


Memo:
"new" at end of line, not sure if address or something else


Memo:
deleted word before address, possibly "Crooked"


Memo:
address: "black" crossed out and replaced with "swan"


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; possible duplicate of 30259


Address:
brought from [th]e Almshowses tower hill


Memo:
date: probably should be 27 but MS gives 7


Memo:
date: probably should be 31 but looks more like 21


Address:
brought from holburne to the Crowne Inn hy street


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; illegible note in left margin


Memo:
illegible deleted word between name and address


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry: "The End of [th]e Booke"


Memo:
address: off bottom of photo, probably hounsditch


Memo:
Note in margin: "Thes 3 were hanged at Tyburne & buried here"


Memo:
part of entry missed off bottom of photo


Address:
East; died "among the gonnes on the hill".


Address:
Upper; died "in a graynne cart on the hill"


Memo:
"Daughter" evidently omitted in the entry


Address:
Upper; Frome the Black Bull Alley Hye Street


Address:
Upper; Frome the Blue Ainckar upon the Tower Hill


Address:
Upper; From Christopher Ben his howsse in the Highstreet


Memo:
Forename as written
Surname J:on with a macron


Unrelated_memo:
At the bottom of the page is an inscription celebrating the Queen


Address:
East; dyed in Robart Bowers howse a gonne maker dwellinge in the East Smithfield


Memo:
Surname partially obliterated by ink blot


Address:
Upper; fownnd about the hanginge tree towards the Towerhill


Address:
East; found in the brome stake on the Tower Hill


Address:
Upper; dwelling at the Whit Belle in the Hye Street


Address:
Upper; out of the Crowne in the Hye Street


Address:
East; dwellinge by Saint Katherines Laynne on the Tower Hill


Memo:
The date in the entry says 26 March 1590


Address:
East; out of the next howsse of the shell fishe


Address:
Upper; out of Franncis Baldwins howse yeman of the Queenes Ma[jes[tes great bathowsse


Address:
East; dwelling in the last howsse of this p[ar]ishe downne to the Gren Gat


Address:
Upper; out of one of the gardens beyond Mr Dows


Address:
Upper; out of t[-]ins garden in the howsse of one Granndge a saltpeterman


Address:
Upper; out of Crosse Gonne Alley in the Hye Street


Address:
East; uot of the cadge of the Tower Hill


Address:
East; dyed in the caadge of the Tower Hill


Address:
Upper; out of Brownnes Rentes by the Myneris


Address:
Upper; out of the gardens beyond the churche


Address:
Upper; out of the furthest howsse in Hounsdich


Address:
Upper; out of Will[ia]m Rawssons howsse in the Hye Street


Address:
East; out of the caadge on the Tower Hill


Address:
Upper; out of a garden howsse in Crossgonne Alley in the Highe Street


Address:
East; out of Hogg Laynne on theTower Hill


Address:
Upper; out of Will[ia]m Brookes howsse in Hownsdiche


Address:
Upper; out of Shipp Alley by the Myneris


Address:
Upper; frome the gardins behind the churche


Address:
Upper; out of the gardens behynd Hownsdiche


Address:
East; Eastsmithfyeld, in the Whit Lyon called John Jeninges Rentes


Address:
Upper; out of Skommer Alley in Hownsdiche


Unrelated_memo:
At the bottom of the page is an elaborate inscription: "Dieu sauve la Roynne"


Address:
East; out of the Flur de Luce upon the Hill


Address:
East; frome Mother Bealls howsse on the Hill


Address:
Upper; out of the gardins behynnd the churche


Address:
East; frome olde Father Mychaelsons howsse


Address:
Upper; out of Skom[m]mer Alley in Hownsdiche


Address:
Upper; dwellinge in the Read gate belowe the Mineris


Address:
East; dwelling of lonng tyme about the diche


Address:
Upper; out of peticoet laynne behynnde the churche


Address:
upper; out of the crosse gonne alley in the hye street


Address:
upper; out of wool sack alley hye street


Address:
upper; out of the poores landes in hownsdiche


Address:
east; at the castell in theast smithfyeld


Address:
upper; out of the gardens in the crosse gonne alley


Address:
east; out of one of the litell howsses under the place on the hill


Address:
east; frome among the gonnes on the hill


Address:
east; frome belowe the pompe in theastsmithfyeld


Address:
upper; dep[ar]ted this lyfe at the howsse of thomas p[ar]ker a gonne maker neare this churche


Address:
upper; out of the gardins behind hownsdiche


Address:
east; dyed on the high waye in east smithfyeld


Address:
upper; out of black bull alley in the hye street


Address:
upper; out of skom[m]er alley in hownsdiche


Address:
upper; out of the gardins behynnd this churche


Address:
upper; frome the cornner at the tower hill


Address:
upper; frome the gardins behind the churche


Address:
upper; out of bayre alley in the hye street


Address:
upper; frome baire alley in the hye street


Unrelated_memo:
orthography: from this event onwards "u" and "v" are entered as given; in burials from 29 March 1590 to here they were standardised on inputting


Address:
upper; out of baire alley in the highe street


Address:
upper; dwellinge in beggers Rowe next the olde 3 tonnes


Address:
upper; at the hatchet neare the posternne


Address:
upper; dwelling in harro alley in the hie street


Address:
upper; dwelling at the signne of the Read lyon


Address:
east; deceassed in the howsse off thomas yardley a blacksmith neare the porck epick


Address:
east; dyed in the howsse of Ralphe presson a sayller dwellinge at the Quennes head


Address:
upper; dwelline in carkams Rentes on the back side of the Read lyon below old Mr goodmans howsse


Address:
upper; dwellinge neare the crosse gonnes of the hye street


Address:
east; dyed in the signne of the prince neare morleis Rentes


Address:
east; dwellin at the newe Mairemayde belowe pund alley


Address:
east; dwelling at the whit lyon on the tower hill


Address:
upper; dwellinge in the great churche yard


Address:
east; dwellinge neare the castell tavernne in east smithfyeld


Address:
upper; dwellinge in black bull alley in the hye street


Address:
Frome the posternne; dwelling at the hatchet neare the posternne


Address:
upper; dwelling at the sonne in the hye street


Address:
east; dwelling in the quennes head eastsmithfyeld


Address:
frome the tower watter gat; dwelling under the tower bullwarcke


Address:
east; dwellin in the new abbey on the tower hill


Address:
east; in a shopp neare to peregrine Jhonsons howsse


Address:
east; dwelling at the signne of the 3 hattes


Address:
frome hownsdiche; sometyme dwelling at the 3 nonnes


Address:
upper; living among the gardens behind this church


Address:
upper; dwelling in the gardins behind this churche


Address:
upper; dyed in a gardin over against the graye hownnd alley neare the mineris


Address:
upper; dyed in the howsse of franncis baldwin yeamn of the Quennes M[ajesties] gret bakhouse


Address:
upper; dwelling on the backsyde of the 3 townnes


Address:
east; neare the crosse kayes in hogg laynne


Address:
upper; next to skom[m]er alley in hownsdiche


Address:
east; dwellinge in new abbey upon the tower hill


Address:
upper; dwelling in brownns Rent a velvet weaver


Address:
east; dwellinge next the signne of the man with sword and daggar


Address:
upper; dwellinge neare to sparoes cornner at the hill


Address:
upper; from shipp alley neare the myneris


Address:
east; dyed on the hill amongst the gonnes in the hye waye


Address:
upper; out of woole sack alley in hownsdiche


Memo:
Date given is 15 Aug, presumably in error


Address:
upper; dyed in mother margeris p[ar]ker hir howsse in shipp alley


Address:
east; at the Rambs head bruhowsse in pety wales


Address:
east; unto olf maister duffyeldes howsse


Address:
east; frome the signne off the gunne east smithfyeld


Address:
upper; dwellinge at the new almes howses on the tower hill


Address:
east; dyed amonge the gonnes at the tower hill


Address:
upper; in harrowe alley in the hye street


Address:
upper; dyed within Robart awstens howsse butcher


Address:
east; Dwellinge at the flurdelis upon the tower hill


Address:
upper; dyed at the blue ainker upon the hill


Address:
upper; from the gardins behinde the churche


Address:
upper; [he] deceassed in Richard Cawsseys howsse


Unrelated_memo:
Postscript: 
Heare I conclude and make an end
he that lacketh money lacketh a frend

f'nn's the 4
of october
1593

By me Robart Heaz Curat


Memo:
Event not dated in register, but occurring between the 26th and the 29th of June


Memo:
The entry appears to be out of register order: it is the last under January and the date is "the first day"


Memo:
The entry in the register is dated 29 Feb


Memo:
Unclear whether comment relates to subject or related person


Memo:
This entry is either out of sequence or intended to be the 7th


Memo:
Entry out of order in register: it appears between two for 20 June. The date is "The one and Thirtith" with "of May" added in the margin.


Memo:
Entry appears at the end of the entries for August, dated simply "The Third".


Memo:
Siblings baptised on the same occasion, not entered as twins


Memo:
Siblings baptised together, not marked as twins


Memo:
Sisters baptised together, not marked as twins


Memo:
The name Jowsye is glossed as Josea in the margin


Memo:
Sisters baptised together, not amrked as twins


Memo:
Brothers baptised together, not marked as twins


Memo:
This entry is either meant to be dated the 13th, or it's out of sequence


Memo:
Probably siblings baptised together, not marked as twins


Memo:
Note in margin in different hand: "I think this should be Boorne"


Memo:
Note in margin glosses surname as "Bludder"


Memo:
Three brothers baptised together, not marked as triplets


Memo:
Surname corrected to Garfeney in the margin


Unrelated_memo:
our most Gracious Lord Kinge Jeames the First of that name was proclamed the same day Kinge of England


Memo:
Father's name corredted in margin as J-on (or I-on) Pluckrose


Memo:
From this entry on, variants of  abbreviations of "east ward" and "upper ward" are added, and transcribed as "east" and "upper"


Unrelated_memo:
Above this entry are inscriptions relating to the fact that the Curate, Henry Riggs, started writing the registers


Address:
upper; dwelling in ye House of Mr Humpherye Clarcke at Tower Hill


Memo:
The presumed e in Preston resembles an æ


Memo:
From this entry on, the ward reference is no longer used, and replaced by address


Address:
in the Baylies place in east smithfeilde


Memo:
The register has this and the next three events in a box marked "Marche 1560 And Aprill"


Memo:
Apparently out of sequence in the register


Memo:
Above this entry is written the word "Mistaken"


Memo:
This was entered out of sequence in the register (see Memo to Event ID 11948)


Memo:
This entry is apparently erroneously headed "Februarye"


Memo:
Entry apparently out of sequence in the register


Memo:
The subjects in this event are labelled "Delicates" in the register


Memo:
Unidentied mark at the beginning of the line


Memo:
Married by "baynes asked at whitechapple"


Memo:
Married "by certificate from Whitechapple"


Memo:
Entry not dated in the register, assumed to be a ditto


Memo:
Married "by vertue of a Lycence from Mr Blackewell office"


Memo:
Married "by vertue of a Lycence from Mr Blackewels offyce"


Memo:
Married "by vertue of a Lycence from Mr Doctor Stanhop"


Memo:
Married "by vertue of a Lycence from Mr Doctor Stanhope"


Memo:
Apparently a duplicate of Event 15097 (marginal note)


Memo:
Married "by a Lycence from Mr Blackewell"


Memo:
Married "by vertue of a Lycence from Mr Blackewells offyce"


Memo:
Married "by a Lycence from Mr Blackewells offyce"


Memo:
Married "by vertue of a Lycence directed from [...] Sir Edwarde Stanhope"


Unrelated_memo:
Inscription above the entry: "Anno Dom[ini] 1604 Die mensis Feb[ruarii] 5 / Here beginneth Henrye Rigges Curate of St Buttolph church w[ith]out Aldgate London to wright ye Register of the Weddinges / Det Christus scriptis Uela secunda meis"


Memo:
Married "by wertue of a Licence grannted out of Mr Blackewelles office"


Memo:
Married "by licence from Mr Blackewells office"


Memo:
The register has a long explanation of the circumstances of this marriage, which was conducted partly by signing, and "wee never had the like before". (Image DSCF0273)


Memo:
Married "by a Lycence form Mr Coston offyce"


Memo:
Entry not dated in register, occurring between 2 and 8 Feb


Memo:
Married "by Licence from Sir Thomas Crompton"


Memo:
Married by a certificate from the vicar of Iver.
Names entered in Italic script.


Memo:
Married "by a Certificat from the parish of Saint Benetes at Paules wharfe (where theire banes were published)"


Memo:
Married "by a Certificate from [Stanford Rivers]"


Memo:
Entry inserted in the margin, in Italic script


Memo:
Entry inserted in margin, in Italic script


Memo:
Entry inserted in margin, in Italic script. Groom's surname is written Gl followed by an m with macron


Memo:
a Couple of lewd p[er]sons ... Maried by Compulsion


Memo:
The register takes no account of the new year until the next page


Memo:
Licence: Ducke

Entry made in Italic script


Memo:
Date adjusted in the register from Jan 12


Memo:
Date adjusted in the register from 29 Dec


Memo:
Groom's surname on crease
Licence: Ducke


Memo:
Adjusted in the register from 22 May
Licence: Ducke


Memo:
Adjusted in the register from 24 Aug, and duplicated

Licence: Duck


Memo:
Out of sequence or date intended to be 16


Memo:
Either out of sequence or intended as dated 24


Memo:
The entry ends "ba[nns] August 4th". See Event 18871.


Memo:
Entry ends with the words "not maried home"


Memo:
The entry ends thus: "both in this p[ar]ish: Rosemary"


Memo:
This is the last entry of this volume. Below are added the words "Heare will I cease because an acts come forth / Mariage by ministers shall bee of littell worth".


Memo:
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given


Memo:
The authorised entry for this marriage appears as Event 19738


Memo:
Entered as a memorandum. The couple were married twice. This entry refers to the second ceremony. Banns not mentioned.


Memo:
For this couple's church event see 19983


Memo:
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given. They were allegedly married by Sir John Wollaston.


Memo:
"Notice was given of this marriage the 19th of May 1655"


Memo:
The reference to the marriage is a memorandum.


Memo:
This couple appear to have been married twice on the same day


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 25th and the 26th.


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day


Memo:
Banns read in Jan/Feb 1655. Church wedding only


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day. Banns are not mentioned.


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on 22 and 25 Mar.


Memo:
Church event only, for the civil event see 19709


Memo:
Date of latest banns only -  marriage date left blank


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 23rd and the 25th


Memo:
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given. The entry ends "... and were Married by me"


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day.
Banns not mentioned


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on 25 Nov and apparently previously, on 10 Oct in church


Memo:
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given, although "maried as they say by Ald[erman] Park ..."


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on 19 and 26 Feb


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day.  
Banns not mentioned.
Civil event not attested.


Memo:
Entry dated 1657
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day.
Banns not mentioned.


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 14th and the 18th


Memo:
This couple were married twice: on the 28th "as appeareth by their Cirtificate", and in church on the 29th.
Banns not mentioned.


Memo:
Married by the Lord Mayor "as was affirmed"


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day.
Banns not mentioned
Unattested


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 17th and in church the 18th
Banns not mentioned


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 29th and in church the 30th


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 7th and the 8th


Memo:
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given
See also 20270


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 22nd and in church the 23rd


Memo:
Banns read in Stanford Rivers, by certificate


Memo:
This couple were married twice on the same day
Banns not mentioned


Memo:
Banns published by the register of Christchurch


Memo:
This couple were married twice, on the 10th and in church the 11th


Memo:
Married "from Mr Deploes house who did affirme her parents Consent"
Banns not mentioned


Memo:
Banns published in the parish church of Romford


Memo:
"Mrs Gifford in Winnell ally in White Chappell p[ar]ish did affirme they had their parents Consent"
Banns not mentioned


Memo:
Banns not mentionedDate of latest banns only - no marriage date given


Memo:
"maried in our Church by Mr Boodge minister and a freind of theirs"
Banns not mentioned


Memo:
Date of latest banns only - no marriage date given
Register has 5 Sep in error


Memo:
Banns published in St Stephens Colemanstreet


Memo:
"after publication as by Certificate appeared"


Memo:
Date reads 5 March but probably intended as 5 Apr


Memo:
"p[er] licence Mr John Birkenheads office"


Memo:
"p[er] licence out of Shermans office Register"


Memo:
"p[er] licence out Shermans office Register"


Memo:
"publication in the p[ar]ish Church of Trinitie in Kingston upon Hull"


Memo:
Published in St Katherines Coleman Street


Memo:
Published in the parish church of "Fetcham in the Countie of Surry"


Memo:
Merried "by a strange minister with our ministers leave"
"p[er] licence Sherman Register"


Memo:
Date indistinct
"p[er] licence Sherman Register"


Memo:
"p[er] licence Radulphus Snowe Register"


Memo:
Note in margin: "Ye clark not at ye mariag"


Memo:
Licence: "ye bishops const[-] Ralph Snow Register


Memo:
Married in the absence of the parish clerk


Unrelated_memo:
In margin: "there was a Couple married ye 28th of [Decem]ber [16]76 by M[aster] Davis & ye Clark not being there he took not there (sic) names"


Memo:
In margin: "This couple were married by M[aster] Davis & ye Clark not being there he forgott ye names"


Memo:
Entry evidently out of sequence in the register


Memo:
The January weddings are headed "December" in the register


Memo:
The January marriages are headed "Decemb[er]"


Memo:
It's not clear whether the parties are from Hendon and Shadwell, respectively, or vice versa


Memo:
Entry not dated; it's the first entry in November


Memo:
Entry inserted at a later date, in a different hand


Memo:
This entry should not be accepted without comparison with 23951 and 23952


Memo:
This entry should not be accepted without comparison with 23950 and 23952


Memo:
This entry should not be accepted without comparison with 23950 and 23951


Memo:
Licence: "court of Rowles by Mr Kemp his office"


Memo:
See also event 24513.

Event out of sequence in the register


Memo:
Entry of sequence in the register; see also Event 24743


Memo:
The entry is dated 1644, presumably in error


Memo:
There is a note in the margin which is illegible owing to the image being under-lit.


Memo:
The word "Flanders Gentleman" are added to the entry


Memo:
Fragment
Date missing; either 11 or 12 Apr


Memo:
Fragment
Date missing; between 1 and 6 May


Memo:
Fragment
Date missing; between 13 and 17 May


Memo:
Duplicate of Event 26335, with variant spellings


Memo:
The entry has him of SBA and both of SAU. "Both" probably in error.


Memo:
Date heading for this and the following entry reads February 15th.


Memo:
Entries under this date headed March 14th


Memo:
Below this entry are written the words "I was not at these"


Memo:
Between this and the previous entry are written the word "not: be:"


Memo:
This entry appears before the previous one in the register


Memo:
Thins event is duplicated in the register


Memo:
Entry reads: Peter Poots a Solger was married ye same day but ye paper that his and har name wos taken in wos Lost


Memo:
Words above the entry appears to read "Not to bee : 2 mo"


Memo:
Entry made in different hand ends 'John Downing Broth[er]'


Memo:
Married 'by ye Bishop of Bath and Wells'


Memo:
At the end of this entry: 'at ye Gouldin Lion by ye Bridge 4s 6d'


Memo:
This entry contains hidden and unexplained information


Memo:
End of entry reads 'Married [...] by banes & left at St Bartholomewes'


Memo:
Entry out of sequence in the repaired and rebound volume


Memo:
Married 'by a Certificate vnder ye hand of Sollomon Smith Justis of Peace for ye Countie of Mid'


Memo:
'this Marriage spuposed [sic] to be ye 7 day'


Memo:
Page torn
Date torn off, possible range 5-9 Mar


Memo:
Page torn
Date torn off, possible range 22-24 Mar


Memo:
Above this entry: 'next dore to ye Cradel in Pettecoat Lane'


Memo:
Above this entry: 'take Care of this name John Flight thare Came A Pearson to teare it out'


Memo:
According to another source, this marriage was authorised by a licence dated 5 May


Memo:
Below this entry: 'Mr Heaths Reg: Ends Heare'


Memo:
Above this entry: 'huft and would not Paie ye sir't'


Unrelated_memo:
Below this entry: 'Mr John King Came in Aprill ye 3rd 1694'


Memo:
Date smudged. Possible reading 1 Jun (out of sequence).


Memo:
Above this entry: 'James Danbrian of St Mary Lee Bow fa:'


Memo:
'Reciued His Majtys Duty'
For the next entry in the register see Event 43949


Memo:
'His Majts Duty Reciued'
Entry inputted out of sequence


Memo:
Gaue me a Noughty Money and not Chang (or: Charg)


Memo:
Above this entry:
'[-]ill Paie'
'Paid me Nothing but was obstenet'


Memo:
DSCF3645 adds 'Le[f]t to Pay 1s'
Date: DSCF3645 has this entry under 20 Sep


Memo:
Entry out of sequence in the register
Entry repeated on next page under 29 Sep, with some variant spellings (44356)
DSCF3645 has 24 Sep


Memo:
Entry out of sequence in the register
'Left to Pay 5s 6d'


Memo:
'Len them 3s 6d out of my Pocket not yet Paid'


Memo:
Added to this entry: 'Thomas Simmons father'


Memo:
Entry out of sequence in the register
DSCF3645 has 'Lef[t] to Pay 5s:6d'


Memo:
'to Pay 3s 6d'
DSCF3645 appears to have 7s 6d


Memo:
DSCF3645 adds 'this is not Placed in the Lest Register'


Memo:
Date in register 3 Sep, occurring between 22 and 24


Memo:
Edited version of irregular entry which reads 'John Wyseman ba and Charcoleman and ye Sine of ye Smallcole man and Margaret Reynolds both of St Mary Whitechappell in Brick Lane'


Memo:
entry ends: 'by Mr King Samuel Fisher father'


Memo:
Entry ends: 'of ye same ye Little Woman that was kept to Show'


Memo:
Above this entry: 'Left to Pay 6d and Abused me'


Memo:
'the Queens Duty Paid to our Collevters'


Memo:
'ye Queens Dury Paid to our Collecters'
In margin: 'n b:'


Memo:
'ye Queens Duty Paid to Mr: Robert Fisher dec:'


Memo:
Entry out of sequence in the register ('Misplaced throw mistake')


Memo:
Event 46299 is repeated ahead of this entry


Memo:
This entry is repeated at the end of Feb, dated 30 Feb [sic]. The wording is the same, but includes 'brought licence'.


Memo:
Actual date 29 Feb, although no leap year


Memo:
For the entry previous to this in the register, see 46333


Memo:
'The Licence being mislaide not Reggestered in order'


Memo:
1570 given as the date heading at top of first page of vellum copy, however both paper copy and following pages of vellum copy suggest this to be incorrect and that year is actually 1571.


Memo:
Name: alias surname also given as "newell"


Memo:
No name given: "A skip[er] a Ducheman out of Wedowe Knores wedowe"


Memo:
note in margin of register next to Anne Jew's entry: "god grannt hir & us all a Joifull meetinge in the heavens & throwghe Jhs crist"


Memo:
"after god my Joye" written in margin with a drawing of a hand pointing to heaven. Name in margin given as "Peter Heasse"


Unrelated_memo:
"It is to be noted that I Robart Heasse
mynister off this churche have buryed
Frome the 14 daye off July 1564
Untill the 30 Daye of Julye 1575     1 M vi C xviii


Memo:
hand pointing drawn next to name in margin


Memo:
Note under her name in margin: R heart-shape with arrow-through H


Memo:
under his name entry in the margin: "my felowe vintenner"


Memo:
drawing of hand pointing in margin and heart, also illegible writing, 1576


Memo:
margin note "my deare falontine van bruges" 1576


Unrelated_memo:
"Elizabeth god save the Quenne" at top of October list


Memo:
originally forename is "Element" in entry but changed in margin to be "Clement"


Memo:
forename originally "Margeryt" but crossed out


Memo:
some drawings in the margin around her name


Unrelated_memo:
Frome the 30 Daye of Julye in Anno 1575 untill the 29 Daye of June in Anno 1577 I have buryed iii C xxviii


Memo:
name in margin originally "Mary Hill" crossed through and Joanne Hill entered


Memo:
drawing of hand pointing in margin next to name


Unrelated_memo:
"God Save our quene" written at top of margin


Memo:
Will[ia]m crossed out both in margin and main entry, both amended to ellen


Memo:
Thomas crossed out in both margin and main entry, replaced with Jhon


Memo:
illegible margin note next to his name, possibly "whing"


Memo:
"one who dyed in the street a this syde the posternne"


Memo:
"date": first entry under June, no actual date in the month given


Memo:
symbol of hand pointing to name in the margin


Memo:
"Baptized the 9th day of March 1642 and was att the request of his Parents Admitted to bee sett in our Register after they had neglected it for the space of 5 yeares. So wee testified Johe Viner Pastor"


Memo:
hand with finger pointing to this entry in the margin


Unrelated_memo:
"This Daie I was putt into Possecion of the Clarkes Place by the Churchewardens beinge Freshe Chosen by the p[ar]ishe before"


Memo:
"baptized at home this 15th day of this January as the father affirmes and at the fathers request was after Registred"


Memo:
"borne the second day of this February 1642 as the parents affirme and at their Requests Being parishioners was Entred in Register"


Memo:
"was baptized the 16th of May 1643 at the [?]  and was at the Request of his Parents Admitted to be Sett in our Register after they had negleckted for [?] the space of 4 yeares so mee tistifie Joh: Vinea Pastor"


Memo:
actual date of baptism not given but entered in between 26th Dec entries


Memo:
"date" entered in 14/10/1645 but note explains that baptism took place 14 Oct 1644, but it was not entered in the register until 2 years later


Memo:
baptism date unclear but seems to be a 6 above January


Address:
at the signe of the Castle at the Posturne gate in the towre libertie


Memo:
inserted in 31 January but actually states "christened the 7th of Februarie Following"


Unrelated_memo:
"If searche be made For any Children whose names are not in this booke I desire that it may bee Considered That For these foure or five years past many Children in this Parishe was nott Christened at all and many Christned privatelie in houses w[hi]ch the Clerke had noe notice off"


Unrelated_memo:
"Heare Mr Morehous that was the Clarke left"


Memo:
"was not Registred for on yeare after she was baptized and att the parents Request then was"


Memo:
Out of date order because registered after baptism had taken place - see Person comment


Memo:
photographer's finger is over where date of October is likely to be


Memo:
"date" not given only year - entry between 18 April and 30 May in register


Memo:
"date" is missing on bottom of page so first of month entered


Unrelated_memo:
missing entry from bottom of previous page - damage to original


Memo:
date missing off bottom of page - last entry was 30 July and next in August so assumed August 1646


Memo:
date missing from bottom of parish register owing to damage - last entry 29 Sept so assumed to be October onwards 1647


Memo:
no day for baptism, just July 1652 so assumed birth date of 9 July


Memo:
no baptism date given so assumed to be same as date of birth


Memo:
no baptism date given so birth date assumed


Memo:
date - year not clear if 1659 or 1660 is meant


Memo:
no baptism date given so birth date entered as event date


Memo:
illegible entry for 1677 entered at bottom of page 69 - dates and names are illegible


Memo:
no baptism date given so birth date used as date of event.  Unclear as to exact date in September.


Memo:
no baptism date given so birth date entered as date of event


Memo:
Year given as 1694 but seems to be a clerical error as in March 1693 entries


Memo:
no baptism date given, assumed to be between March and May 1694


Address:
Parish of St Margaret Westminster in Charleses Street


Memo:
date not clear, looks to be February 1694


Address:
Prescod Streete in ye Parish of St Mary Whitechapell


Address:
harrow Ally in ye Parish of St Botolph Aldgat


Memo:
no baptism date so birth date entered as event date


Unrelated_memo:
illegible entry written down side of margin, looks to refer to 1691


Memo:
no baptism date so date of birth entered as event date


Memo:
confusion over date: possibly born and christened Jan 10th according to added note on register


Memo:
date: month is not given, assumed May from later entry


Memo:
date: no month given, could be April or May


Memo:
date is missing - photographer has covered date


Memo:
date: month assumed as covered by photographer


Memo:
date: buried 17 August but entry dated 16th


Memo:
almost entirely illegible owing to fading


Memo:
the date of burial is actually listed as "The nyne and Thirtith" however because it is between events on the 25th and 31st of January, it seems that the scribe meant the 29th, not the 39th for this entry.


Memo:
note that there is a previous entry for an IIzabell Williamson who was buried on the 21st of Sept 1559


Memo:
entry refers to the deceased only as "my Ladye Darcye", no forename given


Memo:
The date of burial is given as "the nyne and twentith".


Memo:
This may be a duplicate entry as the event immediately before this one is also the burial of a John James on the same date.


Memo:
the entry refers to the deceased only as "Lucas from the Redd Lyon". It is unclear if Lucas was the deceased's forename or surname, however because it was a more prevalent surname than forename during this period I have entered it as a surname.


Memo:
There is a small check mark next to this entry, but it is unclear whether that was done at the time or in a later period.


Memo:
"App" is writen directly preceding "Powell" and it is unclear what it might mean, so I have added it to the surname.


Memo:
The surname ending is readable, but the meaning (superscript like a backwards 9 and attached to aletter that might be an s) is not clear to me.


Unrelated_memo:
In the register it is noted next to the month of July that "In this monethe the plauge began"


Memo:
Deceased noted only as "A Shipper" no name given in register


Unrelated_memo:
This is the last entry for the month of October and in the left margin it is noted "in this moneth died 135"


Memo:
name of deceased not provided in register. Referred to as "wieff of John Gormell"


Memo:
The relationship look-up list does not seem to include an appropriate relationship for someone who is a benefactor for a poor person. Perhaps it would be useful to add a patronage relationship or something similar?


Memo:
entry in register could be read in different ways… orthography "Joane more I knowe not the same daye" The entry before this one is dated 27 March. It is unclear whether "more I knowe not" should be read as one thought, or if "more" was Joane's surname.


Memo:
this entry is listed in the register under the month of March, but in the year 1567. It seems likely that it was a late entry and should have been placed in the March entries for 1566


Memo:
entry names two people only by their first names "Sara and Rachell The sixe and Twentith"


Memo:
entry notes two deceased "Lewis and Sara Fett The Eighte"


Memo:
address not given, but where it normally would be the entry reads "baptised ye 31: day of the moneth as ye parents and neighbouers affirmd"


Memo:
no address given; entry instead reads "was baptised ye : 12nd : day of this moneth [and] was afterwards Registred by order of Mr Lorback [illegible after this]


Memo:
address is difficult to read and so is a best guess


Memo:
this entry seems to have been made after the main entries to th eregister for this month


Memo:
this entry seems to have been made after the main entries for this month; no address given in entry


Memo:
note in the margin that says "this was misplaced"; the end of the entry is illegible and so it is not clear if there is an address listed.


Memo:
no address given in entry, but note comment under baptism subject


Memo:
entry entered after the main entries for Oct; address not listed


Memo:
entry made after the main entries for oct; no address listed


Memo:
entry added after the main entries for the month; no address given


Memo:
entered after the main entries for the month; address not given


Memo:
address is blurred in entry, but it seems to read "tower hill"


Memo:
entry added at the top of the page; no address given in entry


Memo:
surname not given for parents in entry, it also does not note whether they were married. There are two addresses given at the end of the entry, but it isn't clear why: "Haro Ally" and "High Street"


Memo:
entry entered after main entries for January


Memo:
entry made after main events for January


Memo:
entry made after main entries for January; no address given


Memo:
entry made after the main ones for January; no address given


Memo:
entry added after main entries for March


Memo:
two addresses given in entry, it is unclear why


Memo:
entry made in register after main entries for March


Memo:
event entered in register after main entries for April; no address given


Memo:
relationship not directly stated in baptism register "Elizabeth Dunsdon to John Dunsdon and Elizabeth his wife"


Memo:
entry made in register after the normal entries for May


Memo:
entry made after main entries for June; no address given


Memo:
entry made after the main entries for July on this page; no address given


Memo:
entry made before the general entries for July on this page; no address given


Memo:
entry made after main entries for July on page; address illegible in image


Memo:
entry made at the end of normal entries for August on page


Memo:
entry made after the main entries for August on this page; regsitered "by Order of Mr Hollingworth our Minister"; no address given


Unrelated_memo:
"Here the Chrisnings ends in this booke"

written underneath this entry


Memo:
entry made after main entries for January on page; end of entry is illegible, a birth date may be given but it can't be read, and it is unclear if an address is given


Memo:
entred after the main entries for January on the page; address given, but is illegible on image


Memo:
entry made at the end of the normal February entries on the page; no address given


Memo:
entered after the main entries for March on this page


Memo:
only mentions mother, but doesn't explicitly state illigitimacy


Memo:
entered before main entries for September; no address given


Memo:
address only partially legible in image of register


Address:
in hand [and] hatchett ally ny tower hill


Memo:
address may be given, but it is illegible if it is


Memo:
daughter's surname does not match parents surname in entry


Memo:
entry made after the main entries for the month of December


Memo:
no address given; out of date order in register


Memo:
entered after main entries for April in register


Memo:
entered after main entries for May on this page; no address given


Memo:
no address given; end of entry is partially illegible


Memo:
address may be given, but the end of the entry is illegible in the image


Memo:
entry made after main entries for February, "Registred ye: 3rd: day of January 1672" at the requst of the parents; no address given


Memo:
entered after main entries for February; no address given


Memo:
"Registred by Mr Hollingworth our minister"; no address given


Memo:
surname of parents and their marital status are unstated in register, however after what is ostensibly the mother's name, the words "flaming Sword" are written before the address "Minoris". It is unclear if this is an additional address or a surname.


Memo:
entry only partially legible in register


Memo:
"baptized in ye liberty of Norton folge"


Memo:
an asterix has been placed next to this entry in the register


Memo:
"registered two yeare after at ye parents request"; no address given


Memo:
the date for this entry is actually 29 February 1675, however because of the dating system it would not allow this date to be entered in the database, therefore I entered the date as 28 February 1675.


Memo:
note in margin "father was Churchwarden 1674"


Memo:
noted as "misplased" (likely why entry is out of date order in register)


Memo:
parents names and address not given in register


Memo:
entry only partially legible in register; address not given


Memo:
a small cross was placed next to this entry in the left margin of the register


Memo:
after address is written "Mr Gilberts []" unsure of what this means


Memo:
birth date given but is cut off in image; address not given


Memo:
date noted as 29 Feb in register, but Access will not accept this date


Memo:
date noted as 29 Feb in register - access will not accept this date


Memo:
date noted as 29 Feb in register - access will not accept that date


Memo:
the forename of baptisee was combined with her surname, which likely should be inferred as 'hitchcock'


Memo:
no address given; likely a duplicate entry


Memo:
entry put at the end of the page and clearly in a different hand from the normal scribe


Memo:
entered into register out of order and in a different hand


Unrelated_memo:
Note that this is the last entry on the page and the next page has a note by the scribe  that it would not bear ink. The page after starts with entries on 1 March 1684, therefore it looks like most of the entries for February 1684 are missing.


Memo:
parents have different surnames, however the child is not explicitly stated as being illegitimate


Memo:
no mention of father, implied ilegitimacy, but not explicitly stated in register


Memo:
"in the victualling office Tower Hill" - not sure it the victualling office was the place of baptism or another part of the address.


Memo:
address not given, but implied to be Hounsditch


Unrelated_memo:
entry where scribe begins to once again provide marital status of parents.


Unrelated_memo:
entry partially illegible because of wrinkle in page of register


Unrelated_memo:
entry partially illegible as a result of damage to page of register


Unrelated_memo:
entry only partially legible as a result of damage to page of register


Memo:
entry illegible except for part of address


Unrelated_memo:
on the page after this entry is noted "Memorandum if Search be made for any Burialls in the Sad tyme of Visitation lett them look at the end of the Marriages in this Booke and you shall finde them Sett downe'

Memo:
entry only partially legible, can't read forename


Unrelated_memo:
partially illegible because of damage to the page in register


Unrelated_memo:
entry only partially legibel as section of page has been torn


Memo:
this entry is at the bottom of the register page and is laregely illegible.


Memo:
note next to this entry to the right "idj"


Unrelated_memo:
in the right margin there is drawn picture of a hand with a finger pointing at this entry


Unrelated_memo:
there is a drawn hand with a finger pointing towards this entry in the left margin


Memo:
in the left margin there is a drawn hand with a finger pointing towards this entry


Memo:
In the address "Harrow" is written over another word.


Memo:
There is blotting over the first word of the address. "black lyon Lane" is written on the line below "Angle ally". "yard Stoney" is crossed out between "lyon" and "Lane".


Memo:
In the address the "a" in "Nightinggall" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Memo:
In address note "White" not "Whit". "hard" is written instead of "hart".


Memo:
First word of the address is written as "Woolpcak" with the "c" and "a" transposed.


Memo:
In the address "s" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Memo:
Address is written as "Nighting gallane[\]"


Memo:
1700-1 - but 1701 written against next entry


Memo:
In the first word of the address "k" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Memo:
Address may be "Stony Lane" with the "n" of "Lane" written as superscript.


Memo:
The address is written beneath a deletion.


Memo:
This entry and the next entry are possibly related, although no indication is given of this in the register.


Memo:
This entry and the previous entry are possibly related, although no indication is given of this in the register.


Memo:
Before the address "Stayers[f]" is crossed out.


Unrelated_memo:
There appears to be a hole in the manuscript above the first word of the address.


Memo:
In the address a "d" is deleted between "n" and "s".


Memo:
date 1701-2 duplicate entry? Cf Event ID 7012.


Memo:
date 1701-2. Address is written as "Hagh street".


Memo:
date 1701-2.  Hart is also a Jewish surname in this area.


Memo:
The address is written as "Red X street" - with "X" instead of 'cross'.


Memo:
The address is badly written (a "t" is omitted) and there is a hole in the manuscript over its second half.


Memo:
This entry consists of simply the forename of the baptism subject and the address.


Address:
in Ancor & hart ally - - - - High street


Memo:
start of new year.  date heading 1702-3 but no marginal mark at this point.


Memo:
There doesn't appear to be an "l" in the address, but if there is it is very faint.


Memo:
The second word of the address is written above the first.


Memo:
In the address "lan" is written above the end of "Nightinggal".


Memo:
There is a deletion in the left margin beside this entry.


Memo:
The first word of the address is not very clear.


Memo:
The last word of the address is written beneath the second.


Memo:
In the address there is another word after "Hermatidg" - "brig"?


Memo:
Nis[f]el occurs earlier in contexts which suggest Nigel see comment


Memo:
The address looks as if it has been written over something else.


Memo:
The final letter of the address has been partly cut off.


Memo:
There is a blot over the middle of the address.


Memo:
The address is scored out and then "Eas" is written right at the end of the line.


Memo:
date actually 29. This entry is quite faint.


Memo:
NB date - heading on page is for March 1704 but actually 1703-4


Memo:
NB date - heading on page is for March 1704 but actually 1703-4. "Minories" is crossed out before the address.


Memo:
NB date - heading on page is for March 1704 but actually 1703-4. "St Kathernine[\] lane[\]" is crossed out after the address.


Memo:
NB date - heading on page is for March 1704 but actually 1703-4. The address is squashed up.


Memo:
There is slight blotting at the start of the address.


Unrelated_memo:
The manuscript is damaged at the start of this entry and the next two entries.


Memo:
"tweens" is written in the margin to the left of this entry.


Memo:
entry date out of order as comes after 19


Memo:
possible duplicate of next as no address but mother's different


Memo:
date out of order after 24 and before 26 unless 25. Date could read "23", but difficult to make out. Address is faded.


Unrelated_memo:
note new scribe adds parts of this and next entry; other scribal hand  completes entry


Memo:
This entry is blank apart from the address.


Unrelated_memo:
heading "Decem[be]r" crossed out and November put in above.


Memo:
In the address "Bu" is written over "Ro".


Address:
at ye Coffee[\] hous[f]e[\] King Streete[\]


Memo:
1705 in margin against this date for 1st time!


Memo:
"Sunn Yard" is crossed out in front of the address.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "Houns dith".


Memo:
In the first part of the address "e[\]" is written above "ai".


Memo:
In the address there is a word ("lalley"?) scored out between "Whel" and "East:"


Memo:
In address spelling is "cout" rather than "court".


Memo:
date out of sequence after 15 and before 16


Memo:
In the address "High" has been altered to "Vine" (which is partly written above the deletion).


Memo:
Address is written as "7 Sept alley" - instead of "7 Step alley"?


Unrelated_memo:
There is a deletion (possibly of a whole entry or two) beneath this entry, which is the final one on the page.


Memo:
alternative date 22 written small alongside this entry


Unrelated_memo:
date heading December 1705/6 and below January.  Date refers to latter entry.


Memo:
Spelling of the first word of the address is "Peetticoat".


Memo:
In the address spelling is "Nightingael".


Memo:
The second last word of the address is faint.


Memo:
In the address the "r" of "Street" is written over another "e".


Memo:
In the address the "e" of the first word is added above.


Memo:
"Hounsditch" is crossed out before the address.


Memo:
Date looks as if it has been written over "10".


Memo:
There is no "r" in the last word of the address.


Memo:
date 1705/6. There is a deleted letter (or part letter) before the address.


Memo:
In the address "+" is written rather than "x".


Memo:
The address is blotched and altered in places.


Unrelated_memo:
gap left between this and previous entry


Memo:
The second part of the address is not clear.


Unrelated_memo:
MS p. 157 is blank. Entries begin again on MS p. 158. New scribe and even smaller writing.  Dates now on edge of page.


Memo:
End of the address is only partly visible.


Memo:
"mar ye 26" ("ye" written above) is written after the mother's forename. Is this the date of marriage of the parents?


Memo:
The last word of the address is written above "houns".


Memo:
date could be 4. "CW" added after mother's forename and before address.


Memo:
"S" is written after the mother's forename and before the address.


Unrelated_memo:
many of November dates are not very clear as too close to edge of page


Memo:
"att ye" is scored out in front of the address.


Memo:
"High" is written below the address and could refer to this entry or the next one.


Memo:
"High" is written below the address and could refer to this entry or the previous one.


Unrelated_memo:
note from here on Burr Stret houses have numbers assigned


Memo:
date 1706-7 in previous heading so taken to be 1707 here


Memo:
In the address "hors yard" is scored out after "Blak", and "a more[\] head cort" is written on the next line.


Memo:
The last word of the address is written on the line above.


Memo:
The last word of the address is written on the line below.


Memo:
There is some blotting over the address.


Memo:
The last word of the address is written at the end of the line above.


Memo:
"ye mothers[f] nan [name?] is[f] ye mothers[f] name is[f] An moris[f]" [note repetition]


Memo:
In the address the second word is written above the first.


Memo:
In the address the second word is written on the line above.


Memo:
The last one of the address is written on the line above.


Memo:
"King hary yard" is crossed out above the address.


Memo:
The last word of the address is blotched.


Memo:
"nK" is written between the mother's name and the address.


Memo:
date could be 2. The last two letters of the address are written on the line above.


Memo:
In the address the "o" of "Pole" is written as superscript.


Memo:
In the address "ill Lan" is written on the line above"


Memo:
In the address "ingallan" is written on the line above.


Memo:
"King h(?)" is written on the line below the address and may apply to this entry or the next entry.


Memo:
The last two words of the address are written on the line above and could belong to this entry or the previous entry. The last word is not clear.


Address:
a gains[f]t Capt[ain] Wevers[f] - Eas[f]t


Memo:
"Ch W" is written between the mother's forename and the address.


Memo:
In the address "dich" is written above "Houns".


Memo:
"Chu pore" is written above the address.


Memo:
date looks like 15 but if so out of place


Memo:
The first word of the address is obscured owing to blotting.


Memo:
"Red Lyon Aly" is crossed out after the address.


Memo:
The first word of the address is written as "mum" instead of "num".


Unrelated_memo:
date heading "Cris in march 1708", but presumed that year start is 25 March as usual.


Memo:
There is an illegible word at the end of the address.


Memo:
"CP" is written between the mother's forename and the address.


Memo:
The last word of the address is written on the line below. The end of the previous line ("Can") is not visible.


Memo:
Spelling of the address is "Woosack Aly"


Memo:
There is some blotting at the start of the address.


Memo:
"Long seller" is crossed out after the address.


Unrelated_memo:
"Christopher" written in different hand at bottom of page but C badly formed


Unrelated_memo:
headings omitted in microfilming for this and next 3 months.  Order as found on CD and seems to be correct. This is definitely October 1708.


Memo:
"peticot lan" is written beneath the address, but it is not clear whether it relates to this entry or the next entry.


Memo:
"peticot lan" is written above the address, but it is not clear whether it relates to this entry or the previous entry.


Memo:
The first word of the address is blotched.


Memo:
First word of the address is "Story" or it could be "Stony" with a minim short.


Unrelated_memo:
To the right of the heading there is a note beginning "Whense"?? The rest is not clear.


Memo:
Apart from the address, this entry is written in a different hand and ink from the other entries on the page.


Unrelated_memo:
Heading is "Cris in Jan[ua]r[y] 1708/9".


Memo:
"Jenins rents" is crossed out after the address.


Address:
at the Alms[f] hous[f]e[\] - Rosmary Lan


Memo:
Date may be 4, or numeral for the date in the left margin (slightly above this entry) may apply to previous entry. In the latter case the date of birth and baptism could be 7 February.


Memo:
There is some blotting over the "d" in the address.


Memo:
The second word of the address is written on the line above.


Memo:
The initial letter of the first word of the address has been altered.


Memo:
"GL" is crossed out at the end of the address.


Memo:
The first word of the address could be a surname or even an occupation.


Memo:
The final two letters of the address are written on the line above.


Unrelated_memo:
"madegas[f]ker in England" written alongside this and other entries to 30 in margin


Memo:
omitted entry and so written in margin alongside: "baptis[f]s[f]d ye 21 of June[\] this Ins[f]tant & omitted in corte[\] by mytake[\] [mistake]"


Memo:
missing entry cut off by damage to end of page


Memo:
This month follows on from June and heading is "Cris in July 1709" but the following month is also now labelled July


Memo:
In the address the "t" is written on the line above. It is not clear whether or not there is an "s" after it.


Unrelated_memo:
From here until March all date headings have been altered and put back a month - this has been followed here.  As a result there are two Julys.  (If the original date headings were followed there would be two Marches).

Memo:
date heading "August 1709" crossed out and July substituted


Unrelated_memo:
date heading changed from Sept 1709 to August


Memo:
date could be 25. In the address "lan" is written on the line above.


Unrelated_memo:
Oct' crossed out and altered to September 1709


Memo:
or date could be 12. The last word of the address is written on the line above.


Unrelated_memo:
date heading "Novemr" crossed out October substituted ,1709


Memo:
Entry consists solely of surname (which is crossed out) and address.


Memo:
In the address "hous" is written on the line below.


Unrelated_memo:
date heading "decemr" crossed out and "november" substituted, 1709


Memo:
date written as 31 November [but changed from October]


Unrelated_memo:
date heading "Feb" crossed out and altered to "Janiary 1709"


Memo:
There is blotting in the left margin over the date.


Unrelated_memo:
date heading "March" crossed out "Febrewary" substituted, 1709.  Note that almost all of these entries are duplicates of January.  It is possible that Feb is in fact the correct date as there are two Julys...


Memo:
possibly duplicate but names vary Jan Burnett in January


Memo:
possible duplicate Smithers[f] in previous entry


Unrelated_memo:
date heading Cris in march 1710 with 9 above


Memo:
In the address "row" is scored out after "Chu" and "Lane" is written beneath the deletion.


Unrelated_memo:
subsequent entries include references to rates and taxes


Memo:
"by mr Andrews[f]": note or part of address?


Memo:
"Mr F d  Ja: Parson"? Partly crossed out?


Address:
a Litle Aly on ye Leuft Hand in Shipbrewhous[f] feel[


Address:
at [th]e Ale Hous[f]e - Redgate cort minor[


Address:
Half moon & 7 Stars[f] Bucher row [th]e Insin roe Barg Tow[ hill


Memo:
"mr Warins[f] note Kings[f] tax pd ch warden"


Address:
nere ye Kings[f] Arms[f] Shipbrewhous[f]feld


Memo:
"John Reddrops[f] His Brother [address as below] pd ye dutys": can't tell if subject is John, his brother or someone else

Address:
nere Hand Aly petticot lan - Houns[f] dich


Address:
Ston cort nere ye Hermatage East Smith feld


Memo:
date: could be 27 entered out of sequence?

Address:
near ye Angill Stony lane in Gravill lan


Address:
nere ye Kings[f] Head Ship brewhous felds


Address:
ye Mus[f]s[f]ell Bear - Eas[f]t Smithfeeld


Memo:
"dutys[f] pd at ye corner shop nightingallan" [or this may be part of address]


Address:
Kings[f] Head Ship Brewhous[f] feelds[f]


Address:
ye croun nere croun cort Eas[f]t Smithfeeld


Memo:
'mr P: note' crossed out in middle of address


Address:
next dore to ye King Edward petticote lan


Memo:
"noe note ye corp layd at ye dore ye K: Tax pd mr Jarvis[f]"


Memo:
"K Tax pd mr warrins[f] aker [?]; for Bun Hill:"


Address:
Jennins rents Tower Hill nere St Katherns[f]


Address:
Vinigar yard in Son yard nightinggallane


Memo:
"Mr Pi: note"; not sure about first part of address


Address:
ye Ship nere ye Kings[f] Brewhous[f] Eas[f]t Sm:


Memo:
entry between two for 5 June 'Mr Wa: note' at end


Address:
ye firs[f]t cort on ye Wright [ie right] hand in Hand Aly


Address:
at ye Kings[f] Arms[f] nere nightinggallan Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Address:
Carpenters[f] Sqare nere Church yard Aly Eas[f]t


Memo:
[can't check dates for rest of August as illegible]


Address:
agains[f]t ye Church yard Ros[f]mary Lane


Address:
ould meting hous[f] Aly nere Son yard nightingallan


Memo:
date: occurs after 5th; "Mr Warins[f] note"


Memo:
date not given but see duplicate entry (3149)


Address:
nere ye Ros[f]e sun yard nighting gal lan


Address:
Mus[f]s[f]ell Bear Aly Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Memo:
"mr Wa: note"; date underlined in margin


Address:
King and Quens[f] Heat [?Head] Houns[f]dich


Memo:
address: "Gravillan" inserted above line; date underlined in margin

Address:
by ye 3 Cumpas[f]is[f] Haro Aly Gravillan


Memo:
"long seller" clearly part of address here but have previously assumed it was occupation


Memo:
"certifi of Stepney by Sr John Pars[f]ons": residence or burial location?


Address:
at mr Ratlifs[f] Warfe - Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Address:
ship & Shers[f] by nightingallan end Eas[f]t Smith feld


Address:
nere Sr John Pars[f]ons[f] Eas[f]t Smith feld


Memo:
"pd at mr main[f] in ye vickling Offis[f]"


Address:
at a Backers[f] nere Whit chapell Church


Memo:
entry in two lines, or could be two separate burials; first line: "Thomas Kinnis by [th]e Haggs - Hand Aly", second line: "James Whitacar: att Tho Kinnis" with arrow pointing up to insert this after "Kinnis" in line above


Address:
by mr Whithors[f]is[f] Eas[f]t Smithfeeld


Address:
by ye Kings[f] Arms[f] Shipbrewhous[f] feeld


Address:
by ye Ros[f]e Sun yard Eas[f]t Sm: feeld


Address:
from Skinors[f] Alms[f] hous[f]e Great St Hellins


Address:
by ye Croun Croun Cort Eas[f]t Smitheeld


Memo:
date out of order; "sutlers"? Part of address or mother's occupation?


Memo:
"mr Wa note"; date: after two entries for 26


Address:
att ye Three Piggins[f] Eas[f]t Smithfeeld


Address:
by ye Crows[f] nes[f]t Eas[f] Smith feeld


Memo:
address: "nightingal lan" inserted above line and very hard to read


Address:
att Bunducks[f] Wharfe Eas[f]t Smith feld


Memo:
date: new page but still headed March 1695; "Mr Pills note"; "A Burill tr:"? At end of line


Address:
in ye Paued cort Red Ryon Aly minoris[f]


Address:
att St Catherns[f] Shipbrew Hous[f] feeld


Address:
att ye Boote and Griffin Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Memo:
"mr Topins[f] note"; address unclear and might not refer to this event


Memo:
X added in middle of this and some subsequent entries  in address section (probably just filler?)


Memo:
possible duplicate of 3513; "mr Topins[f] note"


Address:
next Capt Weavers[f] Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
from ye Croun Tavern nere Billings[f]gate


Address:
att ye 7 Stars[f] Ratten Row Nightinggallan


Address:
by ye Kings[f] Head Shipp brew hous[f] felds[f]


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; "mr Topins[f] note"


Address:
at a Bakhous[f] nere ye Geat X Houns dich


Memo:
address has father's name in the middle but have assumed all one address for both people


Memo:
"mr Colcots[f] note" in middle of address


Address:
by mr Pills[f] Shipbrewhous[f] fields[f]


Memo:
"mr copins[f] note"; possible duplicate of 3591?


Memo:
address: "1" might be some other mark, like X in earlier entries?


Address:
agains[f]t maudlins[f] rents[f] East Smithfeld


Address:
att ye Boote and Giffin Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Address:
nex the 3 blak Burds[f] Ship brewhous[f] feld


Address:
ye farthis[f]t hous[f] in / Cas[f]tell yard Houns[f] dich


Address:
ye cort on ye Wright hand in Harro Aly High Stret


Address:
Star and Shuger lofe cort Ros[f]e mary Lane


Address:
att ye Duch bakehous[f]e by mr Plats[f] Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
3 King cort P mr Harts[f]horn + Minoris[f]


Address:
by ye Mus[f]s[f]ell Bear Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
by ye 3 Cumpas[f]s[f]is[f] Maudlins[f] rents[f]


Address:
at ye 3 Blak Burds[f] Ship brewhous[f] feelds[f]


Memo:
"mr Colcots[f] not"; unidentified characters in middle of address


Address:
agains[f]t ye naggs[f] head nightinggal lan


Address:
in a cort a Gains[f]t ye Hoggs[f] Hand Aly


Address:
by ye Bunch of Graps[f] + Swed Land cort


Memo:
"Tax pd mr H" at end; address: "at one Williams[f]is[f]" inserted above

Address:
by ye Back hous[f] - Wools[f]ak Aly at one Williams[f]is[f]


Address:
by mr Fremans[f] brewhous[f]e - St Kathenrs[f]


Address:
att the This[f]s[f]ell and Croun Houns[f]dich


Address:
in a Littill cort nere Eas[f]t S: in Ship brewhous[f] feld


Address:
next ye Bunch of Grapes[f] nightinggallan


Address:
in a litle yard by Sun yard nightinggal lan


Address:
in a Paud cort by Ractlifs[f] Brewhous[f] East Smith feld


Address:
att ye Bunch of Graps[f] Goodmans[f] yard


Address:
by ye Cage in Suger lofe Aly Eas[f]t Smith feld


Address:
by ye 3 Cumpas[f]s[f]is[f] - Angill Aly Grauil lan


Address:
By the Brims[f]ton hous[f] Church yard Aly


Address:
in a cort in cock & hoop yard houns[f]dich


Address:
in ye Bacors[f] yard by ye fountain minoris[f]


Memo:
"Mr Top: note"; address: rest illegible in photo


Address:
ye new Pas[f]s[f]idg Croun cort by Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
Suttens[f] rents[f] by the 3 Cumpas[f]is[f] Grauill Lan


Memo:
"paid by Tho hales[f] spectakell maker in Powls[f] churchyard"


Memo:
"Pd by Mr Bryon Ros[f]e & crown tower hill"


Memo:
"mr Colcots[f] note"; address: last letter definitely k


Address:
Scours[f] Aly Swan Aly Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
ye first cort in Ship brew hous[f] feelds[f] from Eas[f]t Smith feld


Address:
att the Coffe Hous[f]e nere ye Red cros[f]s[f] Eas[f]t S feld


Memo:
date appears to be 14 but may be mistake; "mr Colcots[f] note"


Memo:
"mr Colcots[f] note"; address: "Cort" crossed out then repeated


Address:
by ye Pump nere Sun yard Eas[f]t Smithfe[


Address:
By Sr John Parson Brew hous[f] Eas[f]t Smithfe[


Memo:
address: "Hoggs" possibly changed to "Hodgs" or vice versa


Address:
Sugerlofe Aly by ye Cage Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
ye first hous[f]e in ye first litle Aly in Still Aly Just by houns[f]dich


Address:
att ye king and quens[f] head minoris[f]


Memo:
'mr Top note'; last word of address illegible


Memo:
'cer'; address blotted but almost certainly Hounsdich


Address:
in Star Aly By mr Rayners[f] Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Address:
att a Cake Hous[f]e a Gains[f]t ye Cake hous[f] Houns[f] dich


Address:
in ye Aly behind mr Colcots[f] Minoris[f]


Address:
at ye Correll Rock nere ye Hermatage Eas[f]t Smithfee[


Address:
next the Star Star Aly By mr Raynors[f] Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Memo:
'cer'. The Hart family from Weinheim in the Rhineland in Germany 1st Jewish family in Penzance c.1720.  Also Harts among Devon Jews.  See K Pearce & H Fry ed The Lost Jews  of Cornwall (2000) and B. Susser, The Jews of South-West England (1993).


Address:
in ye French cort by the 3 Cumpas[f]s[f]is[f] Gravill Lane


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; 'mr Colcots[f] note'


Unrelated_memo:
headings 'March 1696' throughout and start of new year not noted


Address:
ye Corner hous[f]e of Angill Aly Son yard


Address:
next the Painters[f] Arms Petticote Lane


Memo:
probably a marriage entry; partly crossed out


Address:
by mr Carters[f] a Glas[f]iour Houns[f] dich


Address:
at ye Whit Hart By Whit hart yard Eas[f]t


Address:
the lower end of Haro Aly in a Back yard


Address:
att the Glas[f]co Arms[f] Ship brewhous[f]felds[f]


Address:
ye farthis[f]t hous[f]e in Croun Inn yard High Streete


Address:
Shuger lofe Aly By ye Wach hous[f] Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
next mr Bryan at ye Ros[f]e & Croun tower Hill


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; 'mr Seawards not['


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS; 'mr Doues[f] note'


Memo:
'mr Seawards[f] note'; date: entered out of order in MS


Memo:
'mr Doues[f] note'; date: entered out of order in MS


Memo:
'mr Doues[f] not'; date: entered out of order in MS


Memo:
address: illegible words added above, possibly Est smithfeld


Memo:
'cer Ha: RK: Docr shuters', some of this might be part of address


Memo:
date entry out of order. "cer mr Doues[f] note"


Address:
By ye Crows[f] nes[f]t Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Memo:
'mr Doues[f] note' in middle of address; date unclear but looks more like 25 than 24


Address:
in Red Lyon cort By the nags[f] head Houns[f]dich


Address:
at a Strong Water Shopp By nightinggallan in [


Memo:
date not clear, possibly not given for this entry;  'mr Seawards[f] note'


Memo:
'cer'; date: looks like 1 for this entry and 2 for next, but possibly 9 inserted between them?


Address:
By the Kings[f] Arms[f] Ship Brewhous[f] fel[


Address:
by ye 3 Cumpas[f]s[f]is[f] maudlins[f] rents


Memo:
'mr Doues[f] note'; can't see date on photo


Address:
by ye Blew ball Kings[f] Stret Tower Hill


Address:
ye first hous[f] in Haro Aly in Petticot Lane


Memo:
'mr Seawards[f] note'; can't see dates on photo from here to 4224


Address:
by the 3 Cumpas[f]s[f]is[f] Maudlins[f] ren[


Memo:
date a little obscured. 'mr Doues[f] note'


Address:
at ye Cathern Whelle - Eas[f]t Smithfel[


Address:
in a Aly By Peas[f] Poridg Aly in Gravill Lan


Address:
3 Toebacco Pips[f] ye Bucher rowe Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Address:
att a Coffe houe in Kings[f] stret Tower Hill


Address:
att ye Painters[f] Arms[f]  Petticote lane


Address:
in a Cort by the to sugerlofs[f] Petticot lane


Address:
att ye Tobacco role - Croun cort Eas[f]t


Address:
att ye Green Lettis[f] Bucher row Eas[f]t


Address:
by ye 3 Black Burds[f] Ship Brewhous[f] felds[f]


Address:
by the 3 Cumpas[f]s[f]is[f] Maudlins[f] rents[f]


Memo:
'pd By  mrs Emery Red cros Stret Died in Mous[f]e Aly'


Address:
ye furthis[f]t yard in Black Lyon yard Stony Lane


Memo:
date unclear but looks like probably 3  'mr Sea: note'


Address:
att a yarb Shop by the munks[f] head nightinggallan


Memo:
date unclear but start of month 1-10. 'mr Doues[f] note'; not sure about first word of address


Memo:
date unclear but start of month 1-10.  'mr Doues[f] note'


Memo:
date unclear but start of month 1-10. 'mr Doues[f] note'


Memo:
date unclear but start of month 1-10, probably 8 or 10


Memo:
date blotched and rewritten rather small.  on line below 'Child aboue by mr Doues[f] order'


Address:
next the tobacco rowl croun cort Eas[f]t


Address:
new Pas[f]s[f]idg by croun cort Eas[f]t: Smith feld


Address:
att ye Whit Hart yard Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
att ye Crucked Billitt Kings[f] Stret tower hi[


Address:
at ye Harts[f] Horn Brew hous[f] Eas[f]t Smithfeld


Address:
ye farthis[f]t Hous[f]e in Squerill Aly minoris[f]


Address:
in ye Aly by mous[f] Aly in Eas[f]t Smith feld


Address:
By Cobbs[f] yard in Haro Aly - Pettot Lane


Address:
at ye ould Kings[f] head by Goodmans[f] Gate minoris[f]


Address:
a Gains[f]t the Brod Pas[f]s[f]idg Shipbrew hous[f] feld


Address:
in ye Brod Pas[f]s[f]idg Ship brew hous[f] feeld


Memo:
'Mr Doues[f] note'; date: entered out of order in MS


Address:
at the Cornor of the Churchyard wall Below [


Address:
by mr Fidlors[f] ye Sexton Church yard Aly


Address:
att the oule King Charlis[f] Head minoris[f]


Address:
in a cort By Hains[f]is[f] ye Barbor minoris[f]


Memo:
entry crossed out apart from address. 'mr Doues[f] note'


Address:
by the munmouths Head might ing gall lan


Address:
the farthis[f]t Cornor of Becks[f] rents[f]


Address:
next to ye munmouths head nighting gal lane


Address:
att an Oyl Shop by Sr John Pars[f]ons[f] Eas[f]t Smith feld


Address:
att ye Surgions[f] Arms[f] night ingallan


Address:
By the Las[f]t Gravill Lan att one Bullins[f]


Address:
the farther end of Pops[f] yard minoris[f]


Address:
at ye new Jug lan Coffee hous[f]e Minoris[f]


Address:
att the Painters[f] Arms[f] Petticot lane


Address:
Godders[f] Sun yard next night inggallan


Address:
at ye blew ball by the Watchhous[f]e Eas[f]t Smith feeld


Address:
att the Baks[f]id of ye Cumpas[f]is[f] Gravill lan


Unrelated_memo:
dates illegible again from here to end of page


Address:
Redgat cort By mr Warikiks[f] minoris[f]


Address:
By the Glas[f]co Arms[f] Ship brewhous[f] felds[f]


Memo:
possible duplicate with 4482 but different address

Address:
By the Brewhous[f] Harts[f] Horn Wools[f]ack Aly


Address:
att the 3 Black burds[f] Ship brewhous[f]e felds[f]


Address:
at ye Brewers[f] Arms[f] Ros[f]mary Lane


Memo:
date out of order, possibly altered from 10 to 11


Memo:
address: "ya" crossed out and "Aly" written after


Address:
at the Bunch of Graps[f] nightinggal lan


Address:
By the harts[f] horn Brewhous[f] Eas[f]t


Address:
at the new ham bro Arms[f] Eas[f]t Smith feld


Address:
at the thre Goats[f] heads[f] Houns[f] dich


Address:
Ros[f]e Aly by the Hors[f]hew tower Hill


Address:
at the Bell and Bunch of Graps[f] Eas[f]t Smith feed


Address:
7 Step Aly att ye Cros[f]s[f] Gravill Lan


Address:
ye Cornor hous[f] by the meeting hous[f] Gravill lan


Memo:
date unclear after 12 and before 13. 'a note'


Unrelated_memo:
heading given as March 1698 and new year not indicated


Unrelated_memo:
start of new year heading continues to be March 1698


Memo:
Address partly obscured, probably Est smithfeeld but can't be certain


Memo:
date changed from 2 to 7 and out of date order


Memo:
date blotted, possibly altered from 11 to 10


Memo:
probably not duplicate of 4999 as different address


Memo:
"mr Crofords Note"; date illegible in photo


Memo:
"mr Trewlock Note"; "Minoris": residence or where found?


Unrelated_memo:
heading gives date as Feb 1698/9 from here on


Memo:
date out of order. 'mr Willis[f]is note'


Memo:
address: can't read street name in photo


Unrelated_memo:
from here dates apparently only given for first event of day


Memo:
'mr Grif: note'; address: 'Petticot lane' crossed out


Memo:
date very faded and barely visible in photo


Unrelated_memo:
heading at top of page February 1699 with March below


Unrelated_memo:
beneath this entry: "The last Burings are in the paper Book Beging at 95"


Memo:
"a note"; address: could be "Haro Aly" or "swan Aly", addresses possibly out of sync for previous entries


Memo:
address: is Harrow alley just place where found, not residence?


Memo:
date: entered out of order in MS, event ID order is correct


Memo:
not sure about address but doesn't look like Greens


Memo:
"Py Tarnan gould Smith", not sure what this is


Memo:
date: obscured by finger, probably 12th but not certain


Memo:
"to Cornwall": address, burial loc, something else?


Memo:
"Kysasden" at start of entry: part of name or something else?


Memo:
Date:no day specified in the burial record.


Memo:
Date:no day specified; from here to 21458 go after 21427


Memo:
date: days not specified on this page; "Church": part of address or burial loc?


Memo:
date: days not specified on this page; address: "sun yard" could belong to this or next entry


Memo:
date: days not specified on this page; address: "sun yard" could belong to this or previous entry


Memo:
date: days not specified on this page; address: not sure if first character is number or something else


Memo:
date: days not specified on this page; is "Church" part of address or burial loc?


Memo:
whole entry reads "Grecian strangers", is this name or description?


Memo:
"St. Katherines", address or burial location?


Memo:
"St Katherines", address or burial location?


Memo:
"Southwark": address or burial location?


Memo:
"Longsellors"? at end of line, occupation or address?


Memo:
illegible word at end of entry: address or burial location?


Address:
The Merchant Tailors Almes houses Tower hill


Memo:
illegible word before "minories", if "deceased" it probably refers to other unnamed parent


Memo:
not clear who is subject and who is related


Memo:
date: top of page gives July as month but this is almost certainly scribal error. These entries appear to follow on from June on previous page, and July proper begins further down this page.


Memo:
not sure about address, hard to read, could be burial location


Memo:
illegible word before address, possibly deleted


Memo:
address on line below, might not refer to this person


Memo:
not really sure about details, whole entry appears to read "Lees Child Jn William son to William Harrow Ally"


Memo:
"Rose Mary Lane" on next line, could be part of address for this event


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry: "29" in margin but rest of line blank


Memo:
address could be part of burial location


Memo:
"from Bethlem", part of address or burial location?

Address:
of the Parish of Coleman street from Bethlem


Memo:
date inferred, not explicitly stated in margin; this entry inserted between lines in MS


Address:
att [th]e Ancor and still East smith fe[


Unrelated_memo:
page headed 'March 1699/700' 
and then 'Aprill' only


Address:
Sunn Yard [1st initial could be T or F - badly formed]


Memo:
date heading Mach 1701/2 [note r missed out]


Memo:
X in margin to highlight this event because esquire


Memo:
entry had cross in middle to draw attention to it


Address:
Red X street [note abbreviation for cros]


Address:
Walton court ['Eastsmithfeild' crossed out]


Unrelated_memo:
heading March 1700. back to previous scribe


Memo:
date 1701 as start of new year but not specified


Unrelated_memo:
some addresses occur straight after name


Address:
Virginia street [ending of 1st word unclear]


Address:
Harro ally [changed from Eastsmithfield perhaps]


Address:
Harrow ally ['Sunn and Trumpett' etc crossed out]


Address:
by Spettlefild Marsh [last word unclear]


Address:
Cock & Hoop yard ['Gravil Lane' crossed out]


Address:
in Katherin Streete against ye Savoy in ye Strand


Address:
Red lyon alley H: d: ['Minories[f]' crossed out]


Unrelated_memo:
space left between this and last entry; 'a note'


Address:
'Hounsditch' [possibly crossed out] Petticoat Lane


Memo:
to Samull [after address meaning unclear]


Memo:
date out of order after 17 abd before 16


Address:
at Esqr Vincent Victlin OfficeTower hill


Address:
at ye Pye Tavern [badly written] Aldgate


Unrelated_memo:
date heading omitted but clearly August and dates on edge of page so not always clear.  Addresses now given on right side in column and appears to be different scribe


Unrelated_memo:
dates for this month are in some case lost in binding


Memo:
date unclear 'HM' initials in middle of entry


Unrelated_memo:
dates clearer from here on though partly in margin still

Memo:
date appears to be 13 though only 3 is visible


Unrelated_memo:
Some numbers can be made out in this month just


Memo:
although date is a bit obscured this and next few entries seem to be 11


Unrelated_memo:
entries for June are written larger than May or July


Address:
att Johnathan Adams[f] Haro Aly petticot Lan[


Address:
at ye[\] Lether Sellers[f] Eas[f]t S feld


Address:
at ye[\] blakarmore[\] head - Gravill lan


Address:
by the[\] Dis[f]tiler by the quens[f] l[


Unrelated_memo:
ink blot runs down text from here to bottom of page but little text lost


Address:
[b]y ye[\] 3 neats[f] toungs[f] Haro Aly


Address:
Blaks[f]miths[f] Arms[f] Eas[f]t Sm feld


Memo:
date a little unclear and for next two entries


Address:
Croun cort King hary yard [last 3 words below and look like separate entry]


Address:
belland mr Ha[ [unclear - Haro perhaps or Ho...]


Memo:
date a little unclear but likely for this and next


Address:
ye Alms[f]hous[f] Ros[f]mary Lan [last word above]


Address:
Burd in Hand bucher row [last word above]


Unrelated_memo:
note at end of page: 'The nex Burills[f] follos[f] After the[\] Cris[f]ings[s] in this[f] Book'


Unrelated_memo:
'The burills for ['apl' crossed out] March 1708
1708 would refer to April


Unrelated_memo:
assumed that all entries on this page are dated 2 May


Unrelated_memo:
date heading altered from July 1708 to June#


Unrelated_memo:
large blot obscures some letters down to 13 Nov 1708


Address:
ye Cuting Knife nightingal Lan petticot lan


Memo:
space left below for 3 names to be added later


Memo:
stray address which isn't clearly associated with last or next entry although it could be


Unrelated_memo:
date heading 'Burings[f] in March 1709/10


Memo:
date a little unclear 'mr See[\] note[\]'


Memo:
'Inquier att mr Pardons[f] a shewmaker Kings[f] Street tower hill'


Memo:
addresses given with names in this case rather than after both


Memo:
'paris[f]h' omitted from address of this and others


Unrelated_memo:
next few pages are a duplicate of May 1697 to April 1698 but have been transcribed in full


Unrelated_memo:
note f looks like capital C here and elsewhere


Memo:
duplicate - John forename in original entry


Memo:
duplicate - original has forename John and date is out of order


Memo:
duplicate date 1697-8 new year starts here


Memo:
possibly partly a duplicate though man's name  is John Baker


Memo:
x mark in margin against this entry.  Wife's name sounds Cornish  as confirmed by place of residence!


Memo:
x mark against this entry, address given after each name


Memo:
x marks entry and addresses follow each name


Unrelated_memo:
date 1698-9 but heading gives January 1698


Memo:
date originally 2 and altered, addresses after each name


Memo:
this entry may combine parts of next two


Memo:
1704 added in margin against this entry - start of new year


Memo:
date unclear, possibly 14 and out of order


Memo:
'Matthew' written twice and crossed out 'C' in front of second. 'Ma 11 [or 12] Mathew' below


Unrelated_memo:
new scribe from here - lower case used for names more frequently than before


Memo:
date 1706? or 7?and address after each name


Memo:
date 1706? or 7? address follows each name


Memo:
date 1706? or 7?addresses follow each name


Memo:
date 1706?  or 7?Unusually woman's name comes first after correction


Memo:
date 1706? or 7? and address follows each name


Memo:
date unclear but first entry and betwen 1 and 7


Memo:
date between 7 and 13 and address after each name


Memo:
date unclear  no address 'and maid' at end


Memo:
date unclear and addresses after each name


Memo:
date unclear [entry duplicated see 10 Jan]


Memo:
date unclear [see duplicate entry 27 Jan]


Memo:
date unclear [see duplicate entry 28 Jan]


Unrelated_memo:
below this entry is noted "From August to Febr: Writt over twise"


Memo:
duplicate 'bach and maid' and no address


Unrelated_memo:
original page not copied [entry not noted earlier]


Unrelated_memo:
original page not copied and end of duplicated section [may be 'f' in original section and not noted as separate entry]


Memo:
date a little unclear between 20 and 24 'K:' in margin because names are in wrong order with female first


Memo:
date a little unclear 20-24 and addresses follow each name


Unrelated_memo:
date heading is March 1706/7
'Bach' sometimes used instead of 'B'


Memo:
date a little unclear and addresses after each name


Memo:
'mr Rus[f]s[f]ell' comes after second name and before address


Memo:
date a little unclear and entry takes two lines


Memo:
date given as 1707 but actually new year 1708


Memo:
date not known 1-12, address after each name


Memo:
or could be 13, address follows each name


Memo:
'March 1st' in margin at end of February entries


Memo:
'March 3' in margin occurs at end of February entries


Memo:
under March weddings but dated 3 April in margin


Memo:
or date 26-9 and address after each name


Unrelated_memo:
note that there appear to be no August entries this year


Memo:
entry blank apart from forename of husband


Memo:
this entry is unusually arranged with names on two separate lines


Memo:
date heading Jan 1709 and address after each name


Memo:
names appear on two different lines with address after each name


Unrelated_memo:
from here the addresses are faint and hard to read


Memo:
date missing, wife mentioned before husband, noted in margin, but hard to make out exact working "[ook Woman in natue before ye man]"


# Person

Comment:
"a Bastard Black Child left to the Parish"


Comment:
daughter of a "Strumpet", implies illegitimacy


Comment:
noted as "son" in register, but likely daughter as named "Sarah"


Comment:
surname not stated, illegitimate child; "Basterd Child"


Occupation:
gentlewoman servant to the right honorable the duchesse of Suffolk


Comment:
forename not given, noted as "Mr Richardes wif"


Comment:
"was buried by torche light"..."betwene the howres of 5 and 6 in the mornynge"


Comment:
sex actually noted as "bacheler", but this option is not given in the look-up list


Occupation:
"straunger of brussells [and] the low countreys"


Occupation:
Esquier surveyer of the Queenes maties ordinannce of the Towne of London


Occupation:
musician and servant to the Queenes Matie

Comment:
"was buryed in good name and fame and most godly Repost of all his neighbors"


Occupation:
howsholder; "[new chisen] for the sexten of our church in the mineryes"


Comment:
"was out of the Queenes howse called the further minoryes being in the keeping [and] government of the Right worshippfull Sr Robert Constable knyght".."being on a tewsdaye at even tyde by torch light"


Occupation:
knight Lieuetenaunt of the quens maiesties ordinaunce

Comment:
"on Friday at nyght".."betwene 7 [and] 8 of the clock at nyght

Burial_location:
in the chauncell of the Trinity mineryes churche


Comment:
buried nearly 6 years after given date of death!


Comment:
buried nearly six years after given date of death! See also John Adrianson's burial entry as they likely were brothers and died on the same date, but both were buried six years after death.


Comment:
Two still borne children of Thomas Lavorack the elder


Comment:
Two still borne Children of Thomas Lavorack the elder


Occupation:
howsholder [and] free of the Clothworkers


Occupation:
pursevant [and] free of the Lethersellers


Comment:
still borne child of Thomas Follett lying at Robert Mottes


Occupation:
Musician to the Kings most excellent Mate


Occupation:
howsholder and free of the haberd dashers


Comment:
From Mr Henry Penington from the other minories


Comment:
name not given just noted as "A stranger wch dyed suddenly in the streete"


Comment:
"A man child of the said Margarett Harvies"


Comment:
"Mr Mackhams man" - actual name not given


Occupation:
of the bedchamber and leftennant of his Maiestyes Ordinance


Comment:
"paid to this" entered after the date in th entry


Comment:
not next to entry "paid Minister to this"


Comment:
"ye Ground Giveen" noted next to this entry


Comment:
"A Bastard Child of Mary Lewises By ye Croners warant"


Burial_location:
under ye second Pew within ye Back dore of ye Church


Comment:
buried in the same coffin with her daughter Elizabeth on the same day


Comment:
buried with her mother in the same coffin on the same day


Residence:
of St Mary Whitechappell in A[y]lif Streete


Occupation:
Knight and Baraknight of St James Westminster


Comment:
ye queens duty paid it was inserted in the Sirtifecate


Comment:
note that looks like "600 ll" after date


Comment:
by Sirtificate from Rotherhith in Surry at ye White Leadhouse


Comment:
by Sirtif[icate] to Grate Linford in ye County of Bucks


Comment:
by Sirtifecat to St Katharine Creechurch


Comment:
by Sirtifecate from St Bennet Sherehog in Sire Lane


Comment:
by Sirtifecat to St Margaret Westminster


Occupation:
a Child son to ye Right Honarable ye Lord Dartmouth

Comment:
by Sirtifecate from St Margarets Westminster in queens square ye queens duty paid so Reported in ye Sirtifecate


Comment:
not above entry "carred through ye Passage"


Comment:
note above entry "Carred through ye passage"


Comment:
note next to entry "Carred threw ye Passage"


Comment:
by Sirtifecate to St Katharin Creechurch


Comment:
faint cross next to this entry in the left hand margin; "paid the dutye"

Burial_location:
"in Some baring goo[]" this is rather hard to read and is partially cut off in the picture


Comment:
there is a note in the left margin but it is illegible because of the blurry picture


Comment:
Regarding surname - "Stanley" in left margin with cross and cross above "Standley" after "Elizabeth".


Comment:
"aforenamed Sheath-maker". His stillborn daughter is the previous entry in the register.


Comment:
Regarding surname - "Skipwith" is written in the left margin with "x" above it. "x"  is marked over "Skipworth" after "Agnes" in the entry.


Comment:
"a foundling, so called, the parent[is] vnknowen"


Comment:
Regarding surname - There is an asterisk above "Boren" and an illegible name written in the left margin.


Comment:
"Three Men Children ... borne all at a Birth, and were Stilborne"


Comment:
"A man Child sonne Reputed to one Edward Luxford". No name given.


Comment:
"who was kild, & buried the xxixth day". Not sure whether death and burial on same day.


Comment:
"who was a ffrench-woman".
Spelling of forename is "Michael".


Comment:
"A man Child the Reputed sonne of John Hall". No name given.


Comment:
"A man Child sonne to Thomas Gilding Glover, as the comon fame went". No name given.


Comment:
"a Shoemaker, & an old householder in the parish"


Occupation:
one of the yeomen of the Queenes Maiesties Scalding house


Occupation:
Cittizen and Iron-monger of London, and Parish Clarke here in this parish

Comment:
"Thomas Harridance Cittizen and Iron-monger of London, and Parish Clarke here in this parish for the space of Nineteene yeares, and fiue Monethes ... he was a verie Carrfull & Industrious man in his place"


Comment:
Regarding name - There is a cross above "Georg" and in the left margin there is a cross with "Dauid Georg" beneath it.


Comment:
Regarding surname - There is a "+" above "Capes" and in the left margin there is a "+" with "Capp's" beneath it.


Comment:
"Susanne Holmes al[ia]s homes". Regarding surname - a "2" is written above "Holmes" and in the left margin there is a "2" with "Holmes" beneath it.


Comment:
In the surname it looks as if the "w" has been written over something else ("r"?).


Comment:
Described as "Mrs" and "widow". Also as "a Gentlewoman".


Comment:
There is an asterisk above the surname "Williamson" and in the left margin there is an asterisk, beneath which is written "Williams".


Occupation:
free of the Skinners, somtime Deputie of ye ward


Comment:
"an Ancient widow who dwelt in Hounsditch"


Residence:
a dutch-man that lodged in the house of John Michelson


Comment:
Regarding the surname - there is an asterisk above "Cew" and in the left margin there is an asterisk, beneath which is written "Kiew".


Comment:
Regarding forename - there is a "u" above "Gartride" and in the left margin there is a "u", beneath which is written "Gertrude".


Comment:
Husband of Hellen Lewick who is being buried too.


Comment:
Wife of Ralph Lewick who is being buried too.


Comment:
No surname is given. Entry is out of sequence and begins "Memorandum that Lancelot, sonne to John Ash ..."


Occupation:
one of the Queens Ma[ies]ties Corne-Meaters


Occupation:
the Aldermans Deputie of our Ward of Porsoken

Comment:
"the Aldermans Deputie of our Ward of Porsoken".


Comment:
Regarding surname, there is a "u" above "One" and in the left margin there is a "u", beneath which is "Oney".


Comment:
"Abraham Antose, and Anne Antose, the Children of ..."


Comment:
No name is given. "There dyed a woman in the Cadge at Tower hill whose name We Knowe not".


Comment:
"Dame" is in the margin and "Mr" is scored out at the beginning of the entry.
"Dame Winifryd Hawtry a Lady, and wife ..."


Comment:
No name given. "There was a Man buried out of the Cage at Tower hill"


Comment:
"who dyed at the East ende in the streete"
No surname is given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.


Comment:
"who dyed at Swan Alie gate". No surname is given.


Comment:
Mother of Androwe Mewkell buried on same day.
"Elizabeth Mewkell widowe & Androwe Mewkell her sonne".


Comment:
Son of Elizabeth Mewkell, widow, who was buried on the same day.
"Elizabeth Mewkell widowe & Androwe Mewkell her sonne".


Comment:
No surname given.
"Suzan a Childe whose surname we knowe no"


Comment:
"John Barrell Mr Dowes Clarke".
Is this a servant to Mr Dowes, clark?


Comment:
"Elizabeth Evanes and Agnes Evanes bothe dauters too John Evan[es]"


Comment:
The "y" of the forename has been written over something else.


Comment:
No surname is given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.


Comment:
"a poore Childe in Mother Bawcome[is] house"


Comment:
"Christian Edward[es] at Tower hill Dyed the Twentye Eighte".
Does this mean that he died at Tower Hill? Or could it be that he died and was buried on 28 June?


Comment:
"Richard Liccorish and John Bvtler Both sonnes to Thomas Bvtler Brickeler"


Comment:
"Sara Warde and her Childe the Wife of W[illi]am Warde Joyner". Presumably it is Sara who is the wife.


Comment:
"Sara Warde and her Childe the Wife of W[illi]am Warde Joyner". No name is given for the child.


Comment:
Forename is quite faint. Appears to read "Robertt".


Comment:
"John Phenix Cowp[er] and Vrselie his daughter'


Comment:
No surname is given. Daughter of John Phenix who was buried at the same time.
"John Phenix Cowp[er] and Vrselie his daughter'


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Davie a poore Childe in the House of goodman Isham"


Comment:
"Grace Sandwitch and Robert Sandwitch the wife and sonne to Robert"


Comment:
"Ann Holme[es] and W[illi]am the wife and sonne of W[illi]am"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Ann Holme[es] and W[illi]am the wife and sonne of W[illi]am"


Comment:
"a poore man Dyed in the Cagge at Tower hill"


Comment:
No surname is given. Or "Yoocome" is the surname with no forename.
"Yoocome a Dvtchman"


Comment:
"Daniell Mellon and Christian Mellon sonne[es] to Daniell"


Comment:
There is a blot over the  "H" in the surname.


Comment:
"Beniamine Johnson and Ann Johnsone the sone and davghter two Nichole[es] Johnsone Cowp[er]"


Comment:
"Thomas Catlyn & Elizabeth sone & d to Thomas"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Thomas Catlyn & Elizabeth sone & d to Thomas"


Comment:
"Beniamine Tompsone & Svzan sone & d too John"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Beniamine Tompsone & Svzan sone & d too John"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"a poore woman whose name wee Know not"


Comment:
Surname is written with two capital letters at start - "SAtchell"


Comment:
"Robert Sandwitch scrivener & his three sonne[es]"


Comment:
No name given. 
Son of Robert Sandwitch, scrivener who was buried at the same time.
"Robert Sandwitch scrivener & his three sonne[es]"


Comment:
No surname is given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should appear.


Comment:
"John Jackesone and Nichole[s] sonne[es] to John Jackesone"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"John Jackesone and Nichole[s] sonne[es] to John Jackesone"


Comment:
"A Cope[e]r in Barber Surgynes Rent[es]"
Occupation is written as "Cope" followed by superscript "r".


Comment:
No name is given.
"A poo[e]r man whose name wee knowe not"


Comment:
Occupation is written as "Coupe" with superscript "r".


Comment:
The surname has an erasure at the end of it.


Comment:
Occupation is written as "Cope" with superscript "r".


Comment:
Forename not certain. There are five minims. This scribe's "u" and "n" are very similar. Could be "Dauine"?
"Dannie Keay and Thomas Wainselie"


Comment:
"John Joane[es] & Symon bothe sonne[es] two Margett Joane[es] widdowe"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"John Joane[es] & Symon bothe sonne[es] two Margett Joane[es] widdowe"


Comment:
"Agne[es] ffoster & Elizabeth davghter[es] two Thomas ffoster"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Agne[es] ffoster & Elizabeth davghter[es] two Thomas ffoster"


Comment:
"Thomas Campte & John Tvprige s[er]vant & sone to John Tvprige"


Comment:
"Svzan Bvtton & Marie Hanton s[er]vant[es] tow Symon Child"


Comment:
Surname written as "B", superscript "r" and "ewsie".
"B[e]rewsie" or "B[ou]rewsie" etc?


Comment:
"Joane Lee and Katheren Lee poore Children"


Comment:
"Willi[a]m Jame[es] Laboring man and his sonne"


Comment:
No name given.
"Willi[a]m Jame[es] Laboring man and his sonne"


Comment:
In surname the first "e" is written above the line.


Comment:
"Svzan Garrett & Gartrid dauter[es] two Widdowe Garritt"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore man Whose name We Knowe Nott"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Svzan Garrett & Gartrid dauter[es] two Widdowe Garritt"


Comment:
"Ester vanvevan & Christmas & Mavdlyn vanvevan"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Ester vanvevan & Christmas & Mavdlyn vanvevan"


Comment:
"Joane Tymes and Svzan Tymes ye wiffe and daught[e]r of Ed: Tyme[es]"


Comment:
"Came forth of the Cage at Tow[e]r hill"


Comment:
"Dyed in the streete"
Forename could be "Anis"?


Comment:
"Jaccamenta Vanvevan and Evane Vanvevan"


Comment:
"Richard Elliott & Elizabeth Elliott both Children"


Comment:
Second and third letters of the surname are faded. Appears to read 'Leuver"
Stated sex is "daught[er] in lawe"


Comment:
The middle "a" of the surname is written above the line.


Comment:
"Beniamine Markeland Judeth Markeland and W[illia]m Yeaton servaunt two William Yeaton in Harra Alie".
Not clear whether Beniamine and Judeth are also servants. Could this be a mistake for 'servants and son to'?


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Mary Wife two Peter Rombow & Pet[e]r Rombow".


Comment:
Forename not certain. There are five minims. "Binutt", "Binntt" or "Bunitt"?


Comment:
Stated sex is "daughter ^ in law" (with "in law" being squeezed in above the line)


Comment:
In surname there are six minims and no "i" is dotted.


Comment:
"Thomas Hewland and Phillipp Hewlande sonne[es] to Tho[mas]


Comment:
"Thomas Hewland and Phillipp Hewlande sonne[es] to Tho[mas


Residence:
ffrenchman in y[e] gardens by M[aste]r Dow

Comment:
"ffrenchman in y[e] gardens by M[aste]r Dow"


Comment:
Surname has four minims. Possibly should be "Kennieston" with one minim omitted.


Comment:
"Abraham Tyce sonne two Mathias Rvtton Alios Tyce"


Residence:
dwellinge as you[e] goe, to Tow[e]r hill


Residence:
in Ponde Alye lyui[n]ge in ye howse of widdow Pettinghale


Comment:
"W[illia]m Christian and Vinnifrid Christian Kynesman"


Comment:
"Kynesman"
"W[illia]m Christian and Vinnifrid Christian Kynesman"


Comment:
No forename is given.
"M[aste]r Cole and his wiffe in Rosemary Lane"


Comment:
No name is given.
"M[aste]r Cole and his wiffe in Rosemary Lane"


Comment:
Surname is "Ba" with hook and then "gge".


Comment:
Is "Borne" part of the surname?
"Henry Wood Borne s[er]vaunt"


Comment:
No surname is given. There is a gap left in the manuscript where the surname should appear.


Comment:
Reading of surname not certain. Surname has four minims.


Comment:
Surname "Rutten" is written above the line with "^" beneath it.
"Ali[a]s Tyce the Yonger"


Comment:
No name given.
"Judeth Degrave and her Child"


Comment:
"Thomas Wilkynsonne two Richard Wilkynsonne". It looks as if "sonne" should have been written twice, i.e. again before "two".


Comment:
There is a deletion in the middle of the surname.


Residence:
lyenge in the howse of goodman Tynie[es]

Comment:
"lyenge in the howse of goodman Tynie[es]"


Comment:
Between the surname and residence information, there is something else - but it is illegible. Possibly "mayd"?


Comment:
"Cittizen and Tallowe Chanler. of londo[n]"


Comment:
Forename is not given.
"M[aste]r Higgenes wiffe & a childe in Hownsditch"


Comment:
No name is given.
"M[aste]r Higgenes wiffe & a childe in Hownsditch"


Comment:
"Margett Hopkines and Suzan Johnsonne he[e]r daught[er]"


Comment:
"Zacharias Vanhoariebeker and James s[er]vaunt"


Comment:
"James s[er]vaunt". Unclear whether "s[er]vaunt" is occupation or surname?
"Zacharias Vanhoariebeker and James s[er]vaunt"


Comment:
"Isabell Lamott & Beniamine a poo[e]r Child"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Isabell Lamott & Beniamine a poo[e]r Child"


Comment:
No name is given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the name should appear.


Comment:
"A poo[e]r Childe in Ponde alye"
Forename could be "Anis"?


Comment:
"Marchaunt Vintene[ou]r by ye Mynni[o]r[es]"


Comment:
"Richard Briges & Edward Briges sone to M[aste]r Ambrose Brige[es]"
Reading is "sone".


Residence:
lyenge in the howse of widowe Grene[~]way

Comment:
"lyenge in the howse of widowe Grene[~]way"


Comment:
Surname has one minim more than entered here. In surname there is an extra minim (or else there is a minim short and it should read "Cvnningham").
"Cop[er] in est Smithfield"


Comment:
Entry reads "Thomas Gilbert two Charles"


Comment:
"Harmon Cowp[er] and Wessell Cowp[er] his sonne"


Comment:
Surname is very faded. The second, third and fourth letters are illegible. Possibly ends in "era".


Comment:
"John Hale and Joane Hale son[ne] & daught[er] two Jo: Hale"


Comment:
"Nathaniell Cole & Ellen Cole out of Rosemary lane"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poo[e]r ffellowe out of the Cagge at tow[e]r hill"


Comment:
There is no "s" at the end of the title. Title reads "M[aste]r".


Comment:
Entry reads "Robert Lettie[es] two W[illia]m Lettie[es]"


Comment:
"Robert Avstyne and Anthony Ascew both sonne[es] tow Jo: Avstyne"


Residence:
Lyinge in ye howse of M[ist]r[es]s Myles

Comment:
"Lyinge in ye howse of M[ist]r[es]s Myles"


Comment:
"Christian Michelsone wiffe tow Michelson and Jo: Michelson he[e]r sone"


Comment:
"John Dabbes and Mary Dabbes sonne & daught[er] two John Dabbes"


Comment:
Surname could read "Mvnmoue[es]"
"W[illia]m Mvnmone[es] and W[illia]m Michell both s[er]vaunt[es]"


Comment:
"W[illia]m Mvnmone[es] and W[illia]m Michell both s[er]vaunt[es]"


Comment:
Forename is not given.
"lienge in ye howse of widowe Rawlence"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore ffellowe from M[aste]r Wittie[es] a brew[er]


Comment:
No surname is given. Entry reads "Anna     M[aste]r Massomes", with gap after "Anna". This could possibly be two subjects rather than one subject with a related person.


Comment:
No surname is given.
"John A poo[e]r ffellowe from Swane"


Comment:
"M[aste]r Ambrose Briges and Katheren his daught[er]"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"M[aste]r Ambrose Briges and Katheren his daught[er]"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poo[e]r man who died in the streete"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should appear.


Residence:
in Hownesditch in M[ist]r[es]s Rawlence howse


Comment:
"A man Childe of Thomas Elcocke[es]".
No name given.


Comment:
The forename "Alice" has obviously been written in later as it is in a different hand and there is a gap after it before the surname.


Comment:
"W[illia]m Dracke & Phillip Davies both s[er]vant[es] to Jeames Walt[e]rs"


Comment:
"Thomas Edmond[es] & John Hills both s[er]vant[es]"


Comment:
Forename could be "Ains".
Surname is not given.


Comment:
No name given.
"A poo[e]r man from Towre hill whose name we knowe not"


Comment:
No surname is given.
"Marie ffrom Debecke a poo[e]r Childe"


Comment:
"Henry Kevell and Jane Kevell sonne & daught[er]"
Doesn't give details of parent(s).


Occupation:
ye kinges most Excellent Ma[ies]tie ffifte


Comment:
No name given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the name should be.


Comment:
No name given.
"A poo[e]r boy whose name wee knowe not"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poo[e]r woman out of Swane Alye".


Comment:
No name given.
"A man Childe the Repvted sonne of Thomas Clarke"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore man whose name wee knowe not"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore Boye Dyed In the streete his name we Knowe not"


Comment:
No name given.
"Two womenn Children daughter[es] to John Jackesone yeoman"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.
"a Dvchman".


Comment:
"Katheren Bedwarde & svsan davter[es] to Edward Bedwarde"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Katheren Bedwarde & svsan davter[es] to Edward Bedwarde"


Comment:
No name given.
"A Dvchman Dyed sodenlye in the streete his name we Knowe not"


Comment:
Surname possibly incomplete. There is blotting or deletion at the end of the surname. It begins "Ans" or "Aus".


Comment:
No name given.
"A woeman Childe ... A chrysome"


Comment:
"Samuell Parcker & another man Childe sonnes to Thomas Parcker"


Comment:
No name given.
"Samuell Parcker & another man Childe sonnes to Thomas Parcker"


Comment:
In surname the "a" appears to be written over an "e".


Comment:
"the supposed dawghter of Richarde Fylbee"


Comment:
Forename not certain. It appears to be "Mercye". It is written over something else - possibly "Marye"?


Comment:
Regarding relationship - "Elnar Birtch the supposed dawghter of Andrewe Crossedayle"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore man w[hi]ch dyed in ye streate whose name we knowe not"


Comment:
"Bucke" and "Minister" are written in larger letters than those surrounding these words.


Comment:
"daughter" is scored out and then "wyfe" is written.


Comment:
No name given.
Regarding relationship - "A woeman childe ye supposed dawghter to Henrye Isone"


Comment:
"Master Leonarde Fryar Seardgeant Paynter"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore woeman whose name we knowe not"


Comment:
Regarding relationship - "ye supposed sonne"


Comment:
Regarding relationship - "ye supposed dawghter of"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore Boye Dyed in the Street[es] his name we Knowe not"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore Gerll whose name wee Knowe not"
The "r" of "Gerll" is written as superscript.


Comment:
"W[illi]am Clarke and George Clarke sonne[es] to John Clarke"


Comment:
"Elizabethe Lowe one of the Marchantalors Alme[es] woman"


Comment:
Surname not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.
"a baseborne childe"


Comment:
"a Countreye man lying & dying in ye chourchyarde"


Comment:
"Sarath Debee & Annis Debee dawghters to James Debee"


Comment:
"Henrye Coat[es] & Robart Coat[es] his sonne"


Comment:
Son of Henrye Coat[es] who was buried at the same time.
"Henrye Coat[es] & Robart Coat[es] his sonne"


Comment:
"One Hugh a poore blinde man"
Presumably "Hugh" is the forename. No surname is given.


Comment:
No name given.
"Two men children stillborne, & sonnes to Robart Bowden"


Comment:
"a Scotchman". The first "c" is written as superscript.


Comment:
"John Permarcke & marye Permarcke sonne & dawghter to Peter"


Comment:
Surname not given explicitly.
"John & Thomas Aspenall sonnes to Edwarde Aspenall"


Comment:
Surname is not given, or else "Cornelivs" is the surname and there is no forename.
"Cornelivs a Skypp[er]"


Occupation:
sometyme a Messinger to her Late Maistie

Comment:
"sometyme a Messinger to her Late Maistie"


Comment:
"A stilborne Chylde". No name or sex given.


Comment:
"A poore Boye Dyed in m[aste]r Hartlye[es] Healofte"


Comment:
Regarding surname - entry reads "Joane SavndersasmotheraLawe Wife to Thomas Asmotheralawe ye same daye".


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore Boye Dyed in the streete"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.
"a made servante"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore Woman whose name wee Knowe not"


Comment:
"James Persone and Jane Lynsye s[er]vant[es] to John Brookeman"


Residence:
lodginge in the house of Goodwife ffoster in the gardens by Hounsditch


Residence:
lodginge in peter palmers house in morleys Rent[es]


Cause_of_death:
dyed sodainly in m[aste]r Stubbes his yarde neere Tower Hill

Comment:
No name given. "A poore man who dyed sodainly in m[aste]r Stubbes his yarde neere Tower Hill"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore man one of the pencyoners at the lower end in East Smithfeilde"


Residence:
of Plymouth lodgeing in the house of wydowe Slowe in ponde Alley

Comment:
Surname not given.
Described as "of Plymouth"


Comment:
"one of the pencyoners of the Lower ende"


Comment:
"one of the pencyoners in easte smithfeilde, Aged 100 yeares"


Residence:
lodger in Goodman Byttons house in bell alley


Residence:
lodginge in Goodman wansworthes house in the high streete


Comment:
"one of the pencioners dwelling within the Red gate"


Residence:
dwelling with valentyne wood in easte Smythffeilde


Residence:
lodginge at M[aste]r Prowes in white Chappell


Residence:
Jening[es] Rent[es] in easte smithfeilde


Residence:
late dwellinge neere ye signe of the three king[es]


Residence:
dwellinge in the Gardens neere Hounsditche


Occupation:
Cooper in Harrowe Alley a pencyoner of ye p[ar]ish


Residence:
a Lodger, in James wallys house in Sunne Alley


Occupation:
Clarke of this parish of Saincte Buttolphes extra Aldgate Clothworker

Comment:
Name is written in different and larger hand.


Occupation:
Crossbowe maker by Aldgate ffree of the Armorers


Cause_of_death:
dyed in the streete in the Mothers Armes

Comment:
"a poore Childe who dyed in the streete in the Mothers Armes"


Residence:
late dwelling beyonde the Mynories neere Tower Hill


Comment:
"an aged dutchwoman widowe late of east smithfeilde"


Comment:
"a poore diseased man lodging in an alley in the High streete"


Comment:
Surname is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.
"an Aged man in east smithfeilde one of m[aste]r dowes pencioners"


Comment:
"a porter in Hounsditch who was drowned"


Comment:
This is the father of John Beade who died on the same day:
"Troylus Beade, abouenamed".


Comment:
"a poore man in the Gardens by Hownsditch"


Comment:
Forename and surname are written in a different hand.


Residence:
norsed in wollsacke Alley in the High streete

Comment:
"a Child norsed in wollsacke Alley in the High streete"


Comment:
"frauncys de la sous and Maudlyn de la sous, both children to ..."


Cause_of_death:
dyed of the plague in a garden house in our parish


Comment:
Entry reads "Judith Knighte his wiefe was Buryed the Seaventeenth day". Her husband is the subject of the previous entry: "Tobias Knighte Silkweaver neere the Mynories".


Residence:
in ye Three Kinges Alley neere ye Mynories


Residence:
dwelling with Nathaniell Hudlestone in Hounsditch

Comment:
Entry reads "Edward Wingfeild, dwelling with Nathaniell Hudlestone, in Hounsditch his Brother in Lawe, a worker of Tapistrie and Arras worke, was Buryed in the vaulte ...' Presumably the occupation given is that of Edward.


Comment:
"A stilborne Child, a twyn". No name given.


Comment:
Surname "Askew" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.
In the left margin "Askew" is written in another hand.


Comment:
Surname "Payton" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
Regarding burial location: the phrase "In the new Churchyard by Bedlem" is written to the right of the entry in a different hand. Presumably this refers to the burial location?


Comment:
Described as "hir sister". Refers to Abigall Enon (daughter of John Enon in Harrow Alley deceased), the subject of the previous entry.


Comment:
Entry reads "Phillipp Sheldon sonne to Edward Sheldon in Thames streete who died in this parish".
Ambiguous as to who the phrase "who died in this parish" refers to.


Comment:
"an Aged woman in Rosemary Lane one of ye Pencyoners"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore man who dyed in ye streete, whose name wee could not learne"


Residence:
lodginge at ye house of Edward Knight at Tower Hill


Comment:
"dwelling with Mr John waddys Cooke at Aldgate being his wives Sister was buryed in ye Church"


Comment:
Written as one/two entries. Reads: "Richard Ryding sonne to Hugh Ryding in Swanne Alley
Joane Ryding daughter to ye said Hugh Rydinge, buryed both } The xiith day"


Comment:
"A Bastard, borne in the house of valentyne wood, silkweaver in Nightingale Lane"


Comment:
"al[ia]s Lawson wydowe of the Parish of white Chappell"


Comment:
No name.
"A Crisome Child, baseborne ye Reputed fathers name william Peterson, a prisoner in Newgate ye Mothers name was Mary Bates, dwelling with one Docter Tennante in the High streete yt was Buryed the Thirde day of this Moneth, being a man Child"


Residence:
lodging in the house of Richard Jesupp by Tower Hill


Cause_of_death:
died in the strete in gravell lane sodenly

Comment:
"a stranger who died in the strete in gravell lane sodenly"


Comment:
Forename is "Nicholas". It is written to the left of "Richard" (at the start of the entry) which has been scored out.


Residence:
dwelling in Rose Alley neere the Mynories


Residence:
Norsechilde in Rosemary lane, with one John Reynold[es] Cooper

Comment:
Entry reads: "Elizabeth Hasellwood a Norsechilde in Rosemary lane, with one John Reynold[es] Cooper, daughter to Thomas Hassellwood in St Mary Axe was buryed the xixth


Residence:
lodging in ye house of Robert Toomes in Hounsditch


Occupation:
one of the Common Counsell of this warde of Portsoken. Free of the worshippfull Companye of the Mercers

Comment:
"... departed this Liefe on Christmas day in the morninge, and was Buried the next day following Being the Six and Twentith day of this Moneth of December Anno Domini, 1608, whose Soule (no doubt) is with Christ Jesu"


Occupation:
one of M[aste]r Dowes Pencyoners of ye east end

Comment:
"an Aged man, one of M[aste]r Dowes Pencyoners of ye east end"


Comment:
"Peter Ash (a Boy) sonne to Peter Ash a Cooke in Bowe lane, who dyed in Hounsditch"


Comment:
"an Aged woman, in Beare Alley, one of M[aste]r Dowes pencyoners"


Comment:
"a girle" appears to be added to the end of the entry in different ink?


Residence:
lodging in ye house of Thomas Dixie Taylor by Tower Hill


Residence:
dwelling in east smithfeild by Jacobes well yarde


Residence:
Lodgeing with one Mathewe Pyerson in east smithfeild


Comment:
Surname is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.
"an Aged woman ... one of M[aste]r Dowes pencyoners"


Comment:
"who is aboue mentioned late husband to ye said Dennys"


Residence:
dwelling amonge the Gardens by Hounsditch


Residence:
dwelling in wollsacke Alley in Hounsditch


Occupation:
Taylor in Hounsditch, being ffree of the Shipwrigthes


Comment:
Died in the parish, but buried in Kent.
"departed this liefe at his house in ye said place on Thursday the second day of this Moneth ... paying here all duties for a Buriall in ye Church in as ample Manner as though he had bene heere Buryed"

Burial_location:
was Carryed into Kent to his house in y[a]t Countrey to be Buryed theare


Residence:
kept by John Atwood a Taylor of east smithfeilde


Residence:
kept by willyam Beckes wife in Sunne Alley


Residence:
east smithfeild neere vnto Swanne Alley stayres


Residence:
kept by Robert Austyn porter in Hogg lane


Residence:
dwelling in Red lyon Alley by Tower Hill


Residence:
lodging in Pye Alley in east smithfeilde at Hugh Huckleys


Comment:
"a poore man who dyed sodenly in the streete"


Comment:
No name given. "A poore man who dyed in ye streete in east smithfeild"


Comment:
Described as "before named", i.e. the subject of the previous entry.


Comment:
"Gyles van Aker sonne to Abraham van Aker in Nightingale lane
Anne van Aker daughter to the said Abraham were both buryed } The xxiiijth Day"


Comment:
"John Gyttens servant to Hugh Jones in lothbury who dyed in a garden in our Parish"


Comment:
"who had buryed divers of his Children as before appeareth was Buryed hym selfe of the Plague"


Comment:
Surname may be "Lanoys", but last letter seems to be "r" rather than "s".


Cause_of_death:
Cruelly murthered By one Morgan Colman who Lodged in hir House

Comment:
Regarding death date and cause of death - To the right of this and the following entry is written, in a different hand, the following: "This Ellyn Hunte and Alice hir Mayd were both Cruelly murthered By one Morgan Colman who Lodged in hir House 27 Aprill"


Comment:
Regarding death date and cause of death - To the right of this and the previous entry is written, in a different hand, the following: "This Ellyn Hunte and Alice hir Mayd were both Cruelly murthered By one Morgan Colman who Lodged in hir House 27 Aprill"


Comment:
No name given. "A stillborne Child sonne to Margret Charley a single woman, dwelling with valentyne wood in Nightingale lane, ye Reputed father, one Robert Tiding deceased, late their about dwelling"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.
"one of the marchauntaylors Almsweomen"


Comment:
The ending of the surname ("roij") has been corrected or added. In the left margin "Quatroij" is also written in another hand.


Comment:
"daughter to one Honner ... we could never know ye ffather"


Residence:
dwelling among the gardens by Howndesditch


Comment:
Regarding occupation - "Gunne" is written in a different hand and ink and has been inserted as superscript with "^" beneath.


Residence:
lodging with widow Evans nere the Mynories


Comment:
"a poore man in Hounsditch being lunatike"


Cause_of_death:
dyed in Childbed in the house of Robert Lucas abouenamed

Comment:
Robert Lucas is referred to in earlier entry dated 25 August 1609. That entry is for the stillborn child of William King (whose wife lodged in Lucas' house).


Comment:
"Samuell Davys his sonne an Infant"
"his sonne" refers to Peter Davys the subject of the previous entry.


Comment:
"a poore man who dyed in ye Cage in east smithfeild"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore man who died in the streete in east smithfeild whose name we could not learne"


Comment:
"a poore Child kept by the parish, w[i]t[h] Edward Hawes, Sexton"


Residence:
in eastsmithfeild in ye Barbours rent[es]


Comment:
No name given. "A poore Boy who died in the Cage in east smith feild"


Comment:
"a poore ffellow who dyed in ye Cage in east smith feild"


Residence:
lodging in blw Ancker Alley by Tower Hill


Comment:
No name given. "A poore woman who dyed in Rosemary lane whose name we could not learne".
However, there is a note in a different hand in a box to the right of this entry which reads "Hir name was Mary Rush . ye wife of Richard Rush . a poore man"


Comment:
No name given. "A poore Child who dyed in the same lane whose name we could not learne".
"the same lane" refers to Rosemary lane, in the previous entry.


Occupation:
Cutler ... one of M[aste]r Dowes Pencyoners

Comment:
"Thomas Ramsey Cutler an Aged old man, one of M[aste]r Dowes Pencyoners"


Comment:
No name given.
"A poore woman who dyed in the Cage in east smithfeild whose name we could not learne"


Comment:
"A Chrisome" is written in a different hand to the right of the entry.


Comment:
No name given. "A poore wench in Rosemary lane, whose name we could not learne"


Comment:
At the end of this entry is a gap, then "aged" followed by another gap, but no age information is given.


Occupation:
a Prisoner in the Baylies place in eastsmithfeild

Comment:
"a Prisoner in the Baylies place in eastsmithfeild"


Comment:
At the end of the entry is written "no p[ar]ishioner". Presumably refers to Tabitha (or Robert?).


Comment:
"Robert and Henry Laudyan, twinnes, sonnes to James Laudyan in Pond Alley"


Comment:
"Wyllyam & Elizabeth Pallytory, Children to will[/]m pallytory in ponde alley"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the surname should be.
"deliuered in the streete"


Birth_place:
at John Royes Carpenter in ye Mynories streete

Comment:
Son of James peryn "(whose wife lodging at John Royes Carpenter in ye Mynories streete was their deliuered of Childe)"


Birth_place:
in Nightingale lane, in the house of valentyne wood Silckweaver

Comment:
"Celestina Newman (a Bastarde, the Reputed ffather named Thomas Newman serving man, the Mothers name is Joane Jones a single woman, who was deliuered in Nightingale lane, in the house of valentyne wood Silckweaver)"
"A Bastarde" is written to the right.


Birth_place:
in the house of Willyam fforbar in ye High streete

Comment:
Daughter of Edwarde Killingsworth "whose wife was deliuered in the house of Willyam fforbar in ye High streete"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly, but
"Edwarde and Dorithie Owen, Twynns, the Children of Oliver Owen"


Comment:
"Edwarde and Dorithie Owen, Twynns, the Children of Oliver Owen"


Comment:
"christned at home". This is written to the right of the entry (in the same hand as the entry).


Comment:
Surname is not given. This entry is incomplete. It simply reads "Joane daughter to".


Birth_place:
in ye house of      Barnes in east smithfeilde

Comment:
Regarding birth place - there is a gap in the manuscript before "Barnes". "the Mother was deliuered of hym in ye house of      Barnes in east smithfeilde"
May be illegitimate - "sonne to John Tybauldes, (as it is reported) of Norwich".


Birth_place:
in the house of Thomas Smith in Swanne Alley

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "sonne to Richarde willyams (whose reputed) wife was deliuered of Childe in the house of Thomas Smith in Swanne Alley"


Comment:
"A Twynne" is written in a different hand to the right of the entry.


Comment:
The surname "whiting" is written in the same hand but in different ink.
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"daughter to Barbara Greene a single woman the Reputed ffather named    whitinge". There is a gap before "whitinge".


Birth_place:
in the house of Benedick Moyses wydowe in Hogg Lane neere Hounsditch

Baptism_place:
in the house of Benedick Moyses wydowe in Hogg Lane neere Hounsditch

Comment:
"sonne to Thomas Leceister of Bedforde Towne, whose wiefe lodging in the house of Benedick Moyses wydowe in Hogg Lane neere Hounsditch, was there deliuered of the said Childe, which Child was Christned in ye said house"


Comment:
Surname is written in different ink and hand.


Birth_place:
in the house of wydowe Maddreyn in Hounsditch

Comment:
"Anne Marmaduke daughter to william Marmaduke of Quynbrough in Kente (whose wife named Elizabeth being here in London at lodging in the house of wydowe Maddreyn in Hounsditch was there deliuered of Childe) which Child named Anne as is afforesaide ..."


Comment:
"sonne to one John Ryley a Serving Man (as wee are informed) whose wiefe lodging in our warde in the house of       was there deliuered of the saide Childe ... the Mother named Agnes . put in suerties to ye p[ar]ish"
Gap left after "in the house of"


Birth_place:
in the house of Thomas Symball in wollsacke Alley in the High street

Comment:
In surname the "u" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.
"who was Christne the Six and Twentith day of this Moneth, ffynding great ffavour at ye parrishes handes". "Chrisne" is written in a different hand.


Birth_place:
in the house of Anthonie Montague at the signe of fflushing in the lordshippe of east smithfeilde

Comment:
"who was Christned the seaventh day of this Moneth, putting in suerties"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"deliuered in the street in gravell lane"


Comment:
"at home" is written at the end of the entry. Presumably this refers to the baptism place.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin and to the right of the entry is written "The father to vs vnknowen". Both of these are written in a different hand.
Birth place "in the Cage there" refers to the Cage in east smithfeild.


Comment:
"Bap. at home" is written at the end of the entry.


Comment:
"which Child was Borne in Shorditch parish, and Christned heere"


Comment:
The surname has been altered from "Barnet", with the second "r" being superscript.


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written at the end of the entry in different ink and hand.


Comment:
Surname appears to be written in different ink.


Comment:
"John Coker sonne to John Coker labourer of eastsmithfeild, and Richard Coker sonne to ye abouenamed John Coker, being Twynnes"


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
He is described as son of "Melling whose supposed wife lodgeth at the white lyon in eastsmithfeild"


Comment:
"Christned ye five & twentieth day, and hir mother buried ye same day"


Comment:
Daughter of John Taylor "whose wife lay in, in ye house of Arnold Hatfeild hir father, dwelling beyond ye Mynories"


Comment:
Forename is "Anne" and stated sex is "sonne".


Comment:
"a Bastard" is written to the right of this entry.
"daughter to Thomas ffletcher a Brewers servant, whose Mother was named Agnes Browne a single woman"


Comment:
"Robert Lawdyan sonne to James Lawdyan Taylor in Pond Alley
Henry Laudyan borne at the same tyme sonne to ye said James"
These two baptisms are written as separate entries, but are clearly linked.
"Twins" are inferred.


Birth_place:
in ye house of Roger Sawyer in swan Alley

Comment:
Son of Henry Cletherall "whose wife was brought to bed in ye house of Roger Sawyer in swan Alley"


Birth_place:
in the house of Henry Rogers in east smithfeild

Comment:
Son of John willyams "whose wife lay in in the house of Henry Rogers in east smithfeild"


Comment:
"Davyd Maulton and Elizabeth Maulton twynnes Children to ..."


Comment:
"John vickars and Constance vickers Twynnes Children to ..."


Birth_place:
in the house of widowe Pearce in ye precynct next Tower Hill

Comment:
"Daugher to Elizabeth Inman a single woman, brought a bed in the house of widowe Pearce in ye precynct next Tower Hill, the supposed ffather named Beniamyn Bunnell ..."


Comment:
"Henry Pynner and Richard Pynner Twynns sonnes to one Henry Pynner (whose wife was delivered of them in ye Cage in eastsmithfeild"
There is no closing bracket.


Comment:
"a Bastard, sonne to Daniell Goulding, begotten of one Anne Kellam a single woman, dwelling with Joane deacon in Gravell lane by Hounsditch"


Comment:
The surname "Dawes" is written twice, although the second time it has been deleted.


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written to the right of this entry.
"daughter to Edward Stocke Bricklayer in St Swithns Lane, begotten of Anne Cokum a singlewoman, sister to James Cokum a Butcher in east smith feild"


Comment:
Surname not given explicitly for Edward.
"Edward and John Grigson, sonnes to John Grigson"


Comment:
"Edward and John Grigson, sonnes to John Grigson"


Birth_place:
in the house of one Nicholas Booth, in Rosemary lane

Comment:
"sonne to Thomas Scotte, a Ranger about ye Countrey (whose wife was delivered of the said Childe in the house of one Nicholas Booth in Rosemary lane, and dyed of the plague in Childbed"
There is no closing bracket.


Baptism_place:
the great Brickhouse in Hogg Lane, nere unto the Artillery yard

Comment:
Baptism place "Christned in the same House" refers to "the great Brickhouse in Hogge Lane, nere unto the Artillery yard"


Comment:
In the forename "oe" is written as a diphthong.


Comment:
Surname for Katherine is not given explicitly, but "Katherine, and Anne Burstowe Twyns daughters to willyam Borstowe"


Comment:
"Katherine, and Anne Burstowe Twyns daughters to willyam Borstowe"


Comment:
"ffrauncys Ashbye, sonne to ffrauncys Ashbye a Carman deceased) begotten of one Isabell Parish a single woman lodgeing Harrow Alley"
There is no opening bracket.


Comment:
"sonne to one Nicholas Hedge, (Begotton of one Sara Penson lodging in the house of Thomas Symball in Gravell lane)"


Comment:
Surname not given. "Moses and Aaron, sonnes to John Reynoldes"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"sonne to one Christopher (begotten in Adultry of one Rachell Bett[es] of this parish, yt was Christned the Third of this Moneth, she did Penance ye same day"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"daughter to one willyam wilson, and      (both dwelling with one Thomas wood Glover of east smithfeild)"
The mother's name is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.


Birth_place:
in ye house of Thomas Luddington in east=smithfeild

Comment:
Son of willyam woodward "whose wife was brought a bed in ye house of Thomas Luddington in east=smithfeild hir Brother"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly, but "ffrauncys and Sara Griffyith daughters to Evan Griffith"


Comment:
"ffrauncys and Sara Griffyith daughters to Evan Griffith"


Comment:
No surname is given. "Thomas and Abigall, Twynns Children to Robert ffoster"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written to the right of the entry.
"the supposed sonne of Edward Maulton beyond the Mynories (begotton of Joane Loftes his servant)"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written to the right of the entry.
"Mary Richardson, ye supposed daughter of Thomas Richardson, Begotten of one Elizabeth ffisher"


Comment:
The entry is incomplete and states merely "Robert Harvey sonne to".
"Harvey" appears to be written in different ink.


Comment:
There is an asterisk above the forename and in the left margin there is a corresponding asterisk with the note: "The Father of this Child was maryed But Six dayes before"


Comment:
"John and Martha white Twynnes, sonne and daughter to Morrys white"


Comment:
Surname may be simply "Calbacke". However, it looks as if there is a diphthong "ae".


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"the Reputed sonne of Richard Browne, a Runagate (Begotten of one Margret Cansebye) who was deliuered in Harrow Alley"


Birth_place:
in the house of one widow ffrauncys, in east smithfeild, neere ye further Brewhouse

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "sonne to one Matthew ffarlowes (as wee are informed) (whose Reputed wife (named Anne) was delivered of Child in the house of one widow ffrauncys, in east smithfeild, neere ye further Brewhouse"


Comment:
John Thomson and Anne Thomson are "Twynnes".


Comment:
Katherine Reading is described as "sonne".


Birth_place:
in the house of Edward ffeild Glover in Anchor alley, by the Tower Hill

Comment:
"sonne to one Edward Sendall of Hemnell in the Countye of Norffolke yeoman, whose Mother being a single woman, and Named Margery Spall, was delivered of the said Edward in the house of Edward ffeild Glover in Anchor alley, by the Tower Hill"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"daughter to one Robert Gynner Saylor, begotten of one Margret Bedall a single woman"


Birth_place:
in the house of one John ward in Houndsditch

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"daughter to one Thomas Newsham of Bicklesworth in Bedforde whose Reputed wife Named Ide, was delivered of the said Child in the house of one John ward in Houndsditch"


Comment:
In the surname the second "s" is written over "z"?


Comment:
"a man Child found in the streete vppon a Stall, neere vnto the Mynories, and so named because ye parent[es] are vnknowne, the said Child was Christned the Six and twentith day of this Moneth, & kept by ye ward"


Comment:
Surname not given explicitly for Peter.
"Symon Morley, and Peter, Twynnes"


Birth_place:
Thomas Blenkinsons house Glover in Harrow Alley

Comment:
Son of Nicholas Beale "whose wife was brought a bed of the said Child in Thomas Blenkinsons house Glover in Harrow Alley, and the said Child Christned in this p[ar]ish, the viiith day of this moneth, & suretyes taken"


Comment:
Possibly illegitimate.
Daughter of Thomas Harrison "whose reputed wife named Mary ..."
"Christned the Tenth day of April 1612 . and suretyes taken to discharg ye p[ar]ish"


Comment:
"sureties put in to discharg the parish"


Comment:
The "v" in the surname "Davys" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Baptism_place:
the Lady Eedens house beyond the Mynories

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"daughter to one Georg watt[es] of Bosworth in Leiceister shire, whose Reputed wife was lodged in the Lady Eedens house beyond the Mynories, and the said Elizabeth was Christned in the said house by M[aste]r Brigges our Mynester"


Comment:
"(a Bastard) sonne to one Georg walker, and Thamezine Rosonne a single woman, a Couple of lewd p[er]sons, shee was delivered of the said Child in the streete neere vnto Bishopsgate, and about a moneth after the said Richard was Christned"


Comment:
"Christned the Eight day of July, being then 8 weeks old"


Birth_place:
in the house of widow Johnson in gravell lane neere Hounsditch


Birth_place:
in the house of Thomas Barnes Carman in Rosemary lane


Comment:
"Margery Harbert & Martha Harbert Twynns"


Birth_place:
in the house of hir ffather Henry Morrys in Goodmans yard

Comment:
Regarding birth place - "hir ffather" refers to the father of Isabell's mother who "was delivered of Child in the house of hir ffather Henry Morrys in Goodmans yard"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"sonne to one John Perkyns, whose reputed wife lodged in Morleys rent[es]"


Comment:
"Susanne Hughes, and Jane Hughes, Twynns"


Comment:
"Thomas Jellowes, and Richard Jellowes Twynnes"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Georg, A Bastard, sonne Reputed to one          the Mothers name Anne day". There is a gap in the manuscript where the father's name should appear."
 "A Bastard" is also written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John and Henry Twynns"


Comment:
"Margery Hatton (a Bastard)". " A Bastard" is also written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"William Haynes, sonne to one John Haynes draper, (as wee are informed, the Mother named Mary Hutchinson widow in Hounsditch"


Birth_place:
in the house of widow Mason, a Midwife neere the Posterne

Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of Georg Baker ..."
"A Bastard" is written in the margin to the right of this entry.


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the margin to the left of this entry.


Comment:
"Grace Sommer the Reputed daughter of John Sommer".
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Birth_place:
in the house of Symon Kimberley Silk weaver in Hownsditch

Comment:
"Jacob Hayward the Reputed sonne of one John - Hayward"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"Abraham Shipster and Sara Shipster, Twynns"


Comment:
There is a deletion between the forename and surname.


Birth_place:
in the house of Thomas Lewys a Carman in Rosemary lane

Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one Josua Rowse"
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"Christned at home" but no indication where home is.


Comment:
"Thomas Bagnall and Susanne Bagnall, Twynns Children to one Ellis Bagnall"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.
"sonne to one Henry Cooley, a Carman, (the Mother named Alice webster"


Comment:
"Sara" and "daughter" are written in different ink to that of the rest of the entry.


Comment:
"Amy Benfeild and Elizabeth Benfeild Twynns"


Birth_place:
in the street, in the precynct next vnto the Tower

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the sonne of one Richard Apleby of Sandwich in Kent, as wee ar Informed, whose reputed wife named Rebecca was delivered of the same Child in the street, in the precynct next vnto the Tower"


Comment:
The name is written in a different hand to that of the rest of the entry.


Baptism_place:
Christned in M[aste]r william Potters house in the High street

Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.
"William Dickson, the Reputed sonne of Ephraim Dickson, (begotton of one Barbara Brocas"


Comment:
Forename is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the forename should be.
"an Aged woman"


Comment:
"A nurse Child" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"M[aste]r Robert Cockes Citizen and Tallow Chaundler of London dwelling in the Precynct of Hounsditch, departed this mortall lyfe the Twentith day of September Anno Domini 1609 and was Buried in the Church the Third day of this Moneth of October folowing"


Comment:
"a poore ffellow who dyed in east smithfeild"


Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the Reputed sonne of one Dominicus Bowens a stranger"
"which Child was brought to the Church as a Parishioners Child, but was found contrary, the Mothers name wee ca[n]not learne, as yet"


Baptism_place:
in the house of walter Davys in Pond Alley

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the Reputed sonne of John Shakeley whose Reputed wife lodged in the house of walter Davys in Pond Alley, this John, was Christned in the said house"


Comment:
"Christned at home the third day of this Moneth of July 1614, by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister, which I, the Clarke, knew not of till the Mother was Churched"


Baptism_place:
in the house of Giles Benett in Hounsditch

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the (Reputed) sonne of Richard Swan of Bugden, in the Countie of Huntington, whose (Reputed) wife named Susanne, lodged in the house of Giles Benett in Hounsditch, the said John was Christned in the said house"


Comment:
"Elizabeth Clarke, and Jane Clarke, Twynns"


Comment:
May be illegitimate - son of John Cobball "who Reputed wife lodged in the house of John Collins Clothworker, in Gravell lane nere Hounsditch"


Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"the Reputed daughter of FFrount Charter a Pewterer of the ward, Begotten of one Elizabeth Dixon a widow"


Birth_place:
in the open street in the libertie of East smith feild

Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one Thomas Yarner a lewd p[er]son, the Mother named Agnes Charley, as lewd as himselfe, who was delivered in the open street in the libertie of East smith feild"


Comment:
"Bartholomew Graves, and Thomas Graves, Twinns"


Comment:
Forename is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where the forename should be.


Birth_place:
Arnold Portman a Drayman in Morleys Rent[es] in whose house yt was borne

Comment:
Illegitimate?
"sonne to one ffrancis Collio, the Mother named Jane Portman, daughter to Arnold Portman a Drayman in Morleys Rent[es] in whose house yt was borne"


Birth_place:
in the house of william Austine neere ye Minories

Comment:
May be illegitimate.  "the Reputed daughter of one william Thick penie of the Isle of Elie in Cambridge shire, whose Reputed wife was brought a bed in the house of william Austine neere ye Minories"


Birth_place:
in ye house of one widow Hawkesley neere Swan Alley in East smithfeild

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the Reputed daughter of one william Coles, whose reputed wife named Anne was delivered of Child in ye house of one widow Hawkesley neere Swan Alley in East smithfeild"


Comment:
The surname is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Birth_place:
in the house of Edward FFryer a Bricklayer of ye precincte next the Tower

Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one John Lake of Bemflett in the Countie of Essex, whose Reputed wife named Elizabeth"
"Suerties taken to discharg the parish of the said Child"


Birth_place:
in the house of Laurence Smith in Pond Alley

Baptism_place:
in the house of Laurence Smith in Pond Alley

Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one Thomas Midleton, whose Reputed wife was delivered in the house of Laurence Smith in Pond Alley, it was Christned in the said house about the latter end of March last 1615, by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister"


Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the reputed daughter"


Comment:
Surname is not given, but gap left in the manuscript where it should be.
"the Reputed daughter". In left margin  "A Bastard" etc.
Regarding baptism place - i.e. house of "Thomas Newton a Broker in Hounsditch".
"dyed about a weeke after" the baptism.


Comment:
"a Bastard". "A Bastard" is also written in the left margin beside this entry.


Birth_place:
in the house of Roger Kiddeare in Rosemarie lane

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the Reputed daughter of one Anthonie Smith of Dover in Kent, whose reputed wife named Rebecca, was delivered in the house of Roger Kiddeare in Rosemarie lane"


Comment:
May be illegitimate? "daughter to one John Philipp[es] of St Clement[es] without Temple Barre, the Mother named Jone Holmes a singlewoman of our parish"


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"the reputed daughter of one John Cooke a Taylor, the Mother named Alice Knapp a lewd widow"
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the Reputed daughter of one Hugh FFarington"


Comment:
"Margret Hatton, and Hester Hatton, Twynns"


Birth_place:
in the house of one John Hynde, a Labourer in Rosemary lane

Comment:
"a Bastard, the Reputed daughter"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Birth_place:
in the house of M[aste]r Dennis Fleming Gentleman in the Minories street

Baptism_place:
in the house of M[aste]r Dennis Fleming Gentleman in the Minories street

Comment:
Her mother "was delivered of Child in the house of M[aste]r Dennis Fleming Gentleman in the Minories street, the said Anne was Christned in the said house"


Birth_place:
in Hounsditch in the House of Goodwife Burch

Comment:
"the Reputed sonne of one Richard Tedman a vinteners man, the Mother a Single-woman"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Age:
This Child was a Moneth old, when it was Christned

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"sonne of one Thomas Payne, and Mary his Reputed wife, (who lodged in the house of John Payne his brother" etc.
Age information is given in the left margin with "+" above it and corresponding "+" above the name.


Comment:
"a Child so called, because it was laid at a doore neere vnto Bell alley neere vnto the Tower Hill, the wicked parent[es] vnknowen"


Comment:
The first "i" in the surname is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"the Reputed sonne"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"was Christned the seaventh day, and ye mother buried"


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry, along with a pointing hand.


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter"
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Baptism_place:
in Hogg-lane neere the Barrs without Aldgate in the house of one Georg Lestridge Silck weaver

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"sonne to Thomas Morgan Gentleman, and Margret his reputed wife".
Baptism place is "the said Nicholas was Christned in that house".


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Charitie and Marie Battin Twinns"


Birth_place:
in the house of Robert Porter Silkweaver of wollsack alley in the High-street

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one Edward Palmer of      whose Reputed wife lodged in the house of Robert Porter Silkweaver of wollsack alley in the High-street, and was there delivered"


Comment:
Surname is not given, nor are the parents' details. There are gaps left for both in the manuscript.
A note in the left margin states "This Anne wee could not learne the fathers name at the Font, nor the Mother neuer came to be Churched."


Birth_place:
in the open street neere vnto the Almeshouses by the Tower Hill, in ye ward

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the reputed sonne of one John Godfrey, and Jane his reputed wife, which Jane was delivered of Child in the open street neere vnto the Almeshouses by the Tower Hill, in ye ward"


Birth_place:
in the house of William Riches in Gravell lane

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the Reputed daughter of one Thomas FFenne belonging to the King[es] Boyling House, whose reputed named Joane, was delivered of Child, in the house of William Riches in Gravell lane"


Comment:
"Susanne Parris, and Joane Parris, Twynnes"


Birth_place:
in the house of Oliver Swayne a Blacksmith, in the Barboures Rent[es]

Comment:
May be illegitimate. "the reputed sonne of one John Wiborne, whose reputed wife named Elizabeth, was brought a bed, in the house of Oliver Swayne a Blacksmith, in the Barboures Rent[es]"


Comment:
"the reputed daughter of one John Lathum of East smith feild, the Mother a single-woman, named Marie Thomas"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Birth_place:
in the house of one Jonas Michealson of east smith feild

Baptism_place:
in the house of one Jonas Michealson of east smith feild

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one John Tailor yeoman (whose Reputed wife named       was delivered of Child in the house of one Jonas Michealson of east smith feild) the said Elizabeth was Christned in the said house"


Birth_place:
in the house of John Richardsonne of Gravell lane

Comment:
"the reputed sonne"
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one Nicholas Clay[']s a Barbour-surgion of east smithfeild, the Mother named"


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne of one     Clement, whose Reputed wife named     lodged in the house of one Ralph Dabb[es] of east smith feild"


Comment:
"a Child so named because it was Found at Goodmans gate in the Minories street in our ward of Portsoken, the wicked Parent[es] vnknowen"


Comment:
In surname the second "n" is written over an "e".


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be. This entry is only partial. It reads "Thomas        sonne to".


Comment:
"Marie Tireman, a Bastard, the Reputed daughter"


Comment:
"John Roper, and ffrederick Roper ] Twynns [ Sonne and daughter"


Comment:
"Hearsey Normanvile, and John Normanvile Twi[n]ns"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"FFrancis A man Child which was laid in the High street the wicked parent[es] vnknowen"


Comment:
"was Christened at home by m[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister, about the fourth day of this Month, & the Mother buried a day or two after"


Comment:
"sonne" is crossed out and "daughter" is written above it in different ink and hand.


Comment:
"Elizabeth Lion (a Child so named because it was found in Red lion alley, in the Minories street, the wicked and hard hearted parent[es] vnknowen)"


Birth_place:
in the house of Ralph Gouldsborne Smith in the Minories street


Birth_place:
in the house of Richard Peters a Baker in Eastsmithfeild

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne"


Comment:
"Thomas Gibbins, and Richard Gibbins Twin[']is"


Birth_place:
in the house of one Thomas Peryn a Serving-man in the Minories street


Comment:
"John Orbell, and Elizabeth Orbell, Twinn[']s"


Comment:
Forename is either "Aime" or "Anne". There is a mark above the first minim, but not certain whether it is the dot of an "i" or not.


Comment:
May be illegitimate?
"the Reputed sonne"


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the reputed sonne of Robert Burton a Coachman, & Grace his Reputed wife".


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"daughter to one John Castle an Hostler, whose Reputed wife named Elizabeth lodged in Robert Ingram Carpenter".


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"daughter to one John Michell Scottish-man, & Elizabeth his reputed wife"


Comment:
"John Stradder, and Elizabeth Stradder ] Twinns"


Comment:
"Thomas Stephenson, and Thamezine Stephenson, ] Twinn[']s"


Comment:
Sex is not stated. "Jane Bullocke, to John Bullocke" etc.


Comment:
In surname the "u" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
In surname the "f" is written over a "d".


Age:
Borne about halfe an hower before Thomas Barnes

Comment:
"James Barnes, and Thomas Barnes ] Twinn[']s"
James is the elder twin - "the said James Barnes, was Borne about halfe an hower before Thomas Barnes".


Comment:
"James Barnes, and Thomas Barnes ] Twinn[']s"
Thomas is the younger twin - "the said James Barnes, was Borne about halfe an hower before Thomas Barnes".


Comment:
"the Reputed sonne"
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
"the Reputed sonne"
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"Dorithie Lovell, and Elizabeth Lovell ] Twinns"


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter"


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one Necton Daniel a serving-man, and Elizabeth his Reputed wife".
"was Christned in the house by M[aste]r Brigg[es]".


Comment:
"Dowsabella Hollock, and Dennis Hollock Twinn[']s"


Birth_place:
in the house of one John Bellamie hattrimer in the High street

Comment:
May be illegitimate (the pointing hand in the margin suggests so).
"the Reputed daughter of one John Gascoine ... whose Reputed wife named (also) Marie was delivered in the house of one John Bellamie hattrimer in the High street".


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.


Comment:
Probably illegitimate (the pointing hand in the margin suggests so).
"the Reputed daughter"


Comment:
"Elizabeth Clifford, and Ellinor Clifford Twinn[']s"


Comment:
"Sara Cooke, and Anne Cooke ] Twinn[']s"


Comment:
"baptized at home by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister, in the Moneth of Aprill last past, which I John Clerke the parish Clarke had no knowledge of vntill ffrancis his wife came to be Churched".
ffrancis is the wife of the child's father Richard Tomkins.


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one Henrie Hamond a Baker, the Mother named Elizabeth his Reputed wife, shoe was delivered in the open street"


Baptism_place:
In the house of william Newman ffeltmaker by ye Tower Ditch


Comment:
Surname is partly illegible. Its ending has a blot over it.


Comment:
"Alexander Edwardes and Richard Edwardes twinn[']s"


Comment:
Reading of the surname is not certain, since it is smudged in the middle.


Comment:
"Robert Goldwell, and Thomas Goldwell, ] Twinns"


Comment:
Forename either "Sannuel" or "Samuel" with extra minim.


Birth_place:
in the house of Richard wilkinson Shoemaker of the East end

Comment:
May be illegitimate (pointing hand in the margin suggests so).
"the Reputed sonne of one Jaspar Cooke a serving-man, whose Reputed wife, named Anne, was delivered of Child, in the house of Richard wilkinson Shoemaker of the East end"


Birth_place:
in the house of one Edward Clarke a Turner in Hounsdith

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one Thomas Hutton yeoman, and ffrancis his Reputed wife who was deliuered of Child in the house of one Edward Clarke a Turner in Hounsdith"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
"Edward     A Bastard borne in East smithfeild, wee could not learne the lewd parent[es] names"


Comment:
"ffrancis Stockden, and Joyce Stockden Twinn[']s"


Comment:
Forename is illegible due to a blot that covers it (and extends to the first word of each of the next two entries too).


Comment:
Forename is only partly legible, due to a blot which covers the first part of it and extends to the first word of the previous entry (and slightly to the next entry).
Forename ends "liam" and is possibly "William".


Comment:
Forename can be read, although a blot partly covers the top half of the first letter "A".


Birth_place:
in the house of Valentine Wood Silkeweaver of Hounsditch

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne of John Charnocke of the Cittie of Lincolne, gent, whose Reputed wife named      was delivered of Child in the house of Valentine Wood Silkeweaver of Hounsditch"


Birth_place:
in the house of one Richard Gervayes Baker of East smithfeild

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne of one Richard Cock[es] Sailor, whose Reputed wife named Agnes, was brought a bed in the house of one Richard Gervayes Baker of East smithfeild"


Comment:
"the Reputed sonne of one Richard Harrison a Smith, the Mother named Jaquament Rowse"


Comment:
"was Christned (at home) by M[aste]r Brigg[es]"


Comment:
"Michael ffell[es], and Joyce ffell[es], Twynn[']s"


Comment:
Name has been erased but traces are still visible.


Comment:
"was Christned at home by M[aste]r Brigg[es]"


Comment:
Surname may read "Bullock" but is obscured.
"the Reputed daughter"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry".


Baptism_place:
in the House of M[aste]r Matthias Euans a Phisition, in ye Minories street

Comment:
"Maria Venables alias Crompton"
"was Baptized in the House of M[aste]r Matthias Euans a Phisition, in ye Minories street"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
The entry reads simply: "Sara      daughter to".


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the reputed sonne of John Crimbleton Sailor & Alice his reputed wife"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
The entry reads simply: "Sara         daughter to"


Comment:
Surname is partly obscured, but appears to read "Hamond".


Comment:
Forename appears to read "Aime" as dot above the first minim.


Comment:
"Cicelie Reyner, and Bridget Reyner, Twinns"


Birth_place:
in the house of one William Adames Embrouderer in Hounsditch

Comment:
May be illegitimate (pointing hand in left margin may suggest so).
"sonne to Beniamin Rives Gentleman (as he said) whose (Reputed) wife"


Comment:
"was Christned (at home, by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister) the fourth day of Januarie Anno supradict, which, I, John Clerke the Parish Clarke knew not of till the Mother came to be Churched"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
The entry reads simply: "William      sonne to".


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one Thomas Browne Sailor whose wife" etc.


Baptism_place:
in the house of william Holland neere vnto the Minories

Comment:
May be illegitimate (pointing hand in the margin may suggest so).
"the Reputed daughter of one Thomas williamson Gentleman and Lettice his Reputed wife"
"Christned in the said house", i.e. the house in which Lettice lodged.


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne of one Richard Crouchley, whose Reputed wife", etc.


Baptism_place:
Christned in the house of one Thomas Linsey a Horskeeper in the Three king[es] Alley

Comment:
"A Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.
"an Infant, brought in to our parish vnbaptized, the Reputed daughter of one Henrie Read gentleman (as wee were informed)"


Comment:
Surname is not given. The first line of this entry reads simply "Georg" and on the line beneath it is the following: "This Georg, none could tell vs whose Child he was, neither did his Mother come to be Churched wee suspect it base borne".


Comment:
"the Reputed of one Alexander Denison, Curryer, the Mother named Margerie Easton"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
Spelling of the surname is problematic. Could be "Kenniing" but, if so, there are no dots over the "i"s. There are eight minims. Surname of the father is "Kenning", so it looks as if this should be the same with a minim extra here.


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne of one Henrie Pattison yeoman and Hester his Reputed wife, was borne in Gravell lane"


Comment:
"was Christned (at home) the Eleaventh day"


Comment:
"Eedie Almus, a Child so named, being laid in M[aste]r Goodmans Rentes, the wicked parent[es] vnknowen, it was Christned (by the names a foresaid)"


Comment:
"the other Twynne".
The previous entry concerns the baptism of Hellen Rawbone three days earlier (21 August).
No details of parent(s) are given in this entry.


Comment:
Forename is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.


Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed sonne of one John Kye Mariner, whose reputed wife" etc.


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter to one William Stiles" etc.
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"daughter" has been scored out, but no (legible) replacement made.


Comment:
"a Child found in the ward of Portsoken"


Comment:
"Edward Henger and Joyce Henger Twynn[']s"


Comment:
May be illegitimate. Surname not given. Entry reads "Thomas    sonne to" with gap left for the surname followed by comment:
"wee could not learne the parent[es] names".
In the left margin is written: "wee doubt this Thomas be some base Child" etc.


Comment:
"was Christned at home by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister the      day of May, which I John Clerke the parish Clarke, knew not of, till it was brougte to be buried"


Comment:
May be illegitimate. Surname is not given, although gap left in the manuscript where it should be.
Entry reads simply "Jane   daughter to".
Note in left margin reads: "wee doubt this Jane to be a base Child also"


Comment:
"Nathaniel wright, and Marie Wright, Twinn[']s"


Comment:
"was Christned (at home, about ye xxvijth day"


Comment:
"Katherine Owen and Prisca Owen, Twinnes"


Birth_place:
in the house of Thomas Salisburie hir ffather [i.e. the mother's father], of the precyncte next the Tower Hill

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one Nicholas Miller and Joane his reputed wife, (who was delivered of Child in the house of Thomas Salisburie hir ffather, of the precyncte next the Tower Hill,)"


Comment:
Surname is written as "fflemimg", presumably in error for "ffleming" (i.e. with an extra minim).


Comment:
"William Skynne, and Richard Skynne Twinn[']s"


Comment:
"John Hurste and William Hurste twinns"
"were Christned at home by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister"


Comment:
"No Parishioner" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"was Christned at home by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister, on the fift day of this Moneth which, the parish Clarke had no knowledge of, till such time as ye Mother was Churched".


Comment:
"John - Brooke, and Henrie Brooke twinn[']s"


Comment:
"Thomas Holbrooke, and Marie Holbrooke Twinn[']s"


Birth_place:
in the house of Thomas Knowles of Cock Court in Hounsditch Carpenter

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one William Tunstone a Coach-man, whose Reputed wife named Anne, was delivered in the house of Thomas Knowles of Cock Court in Hounsditch Carpenter"


Comment:
May be illegitimate?
"the Reputed daughter of one Joab Lawford & Katherine his wife".


Comment:
"Sara Greene and Rachel Greene twinn[']s"


Comment:
"the (Reputed) sonne of Thomas Butler"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter of one Peter Pope Gouldsmith (the Mother named Martha Piewson a blynd woman,"


Comment:
"William Pantrey, and Anne Pantrey Twinn[']s"


Comment:
Baptism place "in the house", i.e. in the Minories street.
Baptism "by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister, about the Ninth day of this Moneth, which, I, the Parish Clarke knew not of till ye Mother was Churched".


Comment:
"Joane Evers, and Elizabeth Evers twinnes"


Baptism_place:
in the house of one Peter Rowland, a Horne-breaker in East smithfeild

Comment:
"the Reputed sonne"
"wee doubt it is a base borne Child, because the Mother privelie stole away from hir lodgeing"
There is a marginal note to the right of the entry: "This Child is one of the Doubtfull Gen".


Comment:
"Philip Litton, and Bridget Litton Twinn[']s"


Comment:
Entry reads: "Salomon Vandebrooke sonne to Salomon Vandebrooke a Weauer of Tufte-Taffata, was Borne in our Parish, the Foure and Twentieth day of Julie Anno Domini One Thousand Six Hundreth and Twentie, and was Baptized at the Dutch- Church".


Comment:
Entry reads: "John Vandebrooke, sonne to the said Salomon Vandebrooke, was Borne the Fiue and Twentieth day of Aprill Anno Domini One Thousand Six Hundreth Twentie and two, and was also Baptized in the Dutch Church".


Baptism_place:
at home in his House in the Minories street

Comment:
Entry reads: "Beniamin Vandebrooke, sonne to the said Salomon Vandebrooke was Borne the Twentie and Eight day of Februarie Anno Domini One Thousand Six Hundreth, twentie and Three, and was Baptized at home in his House in the Minories street".


Comment:
Stated sex is given as "wife". Presumably this is a mistake for "daughter"!


Comment:
"a Bastard"
"the fathers name wee could not learne"


Comment:
"Susanne d Cottum". Presumably the "d" has been written in error, i.e. has begun to write "daughter" before remembering to write surname?


Birth_place:
in the house of one Thomas Negus a Porter in the Minories street

Comment:
May be illegitimate.
"the Reputed daughter of one John Thackarie,       the Mother named Lucie Groome who was delivered of Child in the house of one Thomas Negus a Porter in the Minories street"
There is a gap after the father's name.


Comment:
Baptism place "at home" is written at right end of line between this entry and the next entry. Due to usual placement, it is likely to refer to this entry rather than the next entry.


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
Baptism place "at hir Lodgeing" refers to the lodging of his mother.


Birth_place:
in the Parish of St Botolph without Aldgate London [...] Henrie Bludder Gent in whose house, shee was Borne

Comment:
"Borne on Saterday the Eighteenth day of September Anno 1624, in the Parish of St Botolph without Aldgate London, and was Christned there, on Friday the Fift day of Nouember"
"Wittnes hereunto, Henrie Bludder Gent in whose house, shee was Borne".


Comment:
"Anne Garrison, and, Margret Garrison, twinns"


Comment:
"was baptized at home by M[aste]r Brigg[es] our Minister, the Eleaventh day of November aboue-said, which I the Clarke had no knowledge of till the xxth day of the said Moneth, that it was brought to be buried".


Comment:
"John Packman, and Thomas Packman twinns"


Comment:
May be illegitimate?
"the Reputed sonne of one John Platt serving-man, & Jane his wife".
Note in the left margin beside this entry states: "Shee was delivered in the Street".


Comment:
"was Christned (at home about the Ninth day of this Moneth, of Februarie"
There is no closing bracket.


Comment:
"the Reputed daughter"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"the Mother delivered in the street"


Comment:
"was Christned at home By our Minister about the Nineteenth day of this Moneth"


Comment:
"the Reputed sonne"
"A Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"was Christned (at home) by M[aste]r Brigg[es]"


Comment:
"Henrie Butler, and Thomas Butler, Twynn[']s"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be. Entry reads simply: "John     son to".


Comment:
Entry reads simply: "John Cage borne in the Cage".


Comment:
Entry reads simply: "John Elliott so[n] to".


Comment:
Surname is not certain. Possibly "Couiers" or "Coiuers"?


Comment:
Surname is not given. Entry reads simply "Sarah".


Comment:
Surname is not given. Entry reads simply "Charles".


Comment:
Surname is not given. Entry reads simply "Mary".


Comment:
Entry reads simply "Georg ffrith son to"


Comment:
"William Harridance
Ann Harridance       } twins of Nicoll Harridance"


Comment:
"John Coale
Thomas Coale } twins of John Coale"


Comment:
"Thomas Browne
Edward Browne   } twins to William Browne"


Comment:
"Raphe Cooper
Andrew Cooper   } twins to Humfrey Cooper"


Comment:
"Ellinor Harrison
Margaret Harrison } twins to William Harrison"


Comment:
Isacc's status as a twin comes from the following entry concerning Jacob Stanforth who is described as being "son alsoe to the said James Stanforth being twins".


Comment:
Jacob is described as "son alsoe to the said James Stanforth being twins".
This refers to the previous entry concerning Isacc Stanforth "son to James Stanforth and Hester his wife".


Comment:
"a base childe begotten on the body of Ellin Robinson by ffulke Marroe"


Comment:
"George Lamberte           ]
Bartholomewe Lambert  ] twins"
Alice Lamberte                 ]


Comment:
"Nathaniell Cannar
Joane Cannar          } twins"


Comment:
In surname "rc" is written over some other letters.


Comment:
"Christian Rayner
Elizabeth Rayner  } twins"


Comment:
Surname looks as if it has been added later.


Comment:
"Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"Bastarde" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"George Garford
John Garforde    } twins"


Comment:
Forename has been written over an erasure.


Comment:
"ffardynando Colt
Symeon Colte      } twins"


Comment:
"born ye 28 of this September morle[is] Rent[es] as ye"
There are another two words after this, but they are illegible.
Not clear whether Morle[is] Rent[es] is the address or birth place.


Comment:
"Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Bastard" is written in the left margin beside this entry.


Comment:
"Bastard" is written to the right of this entry.


Comment:
Forename is illegible due to a large blot over it. It ends with a "t".


Comment:
"Bastarde" is written in the left margin beside this entry.
"a bastard" is also written at the end of the entry.


Comment:
"Avis Staples
Christian Staples } twyns"


Comment:
"ffrances Bailye
Elizabeth Bailye } twins"


Comment:
"This Child was baptized by M[aste]r Swadlin our Minister when it was about seaven yeares olde"


Comment:
Forename is very faded and reading is not certain.


Comment:
May be illegitimate, but not explicitly stated.


Comment:
"the brother and 2 sister[es] of this childe were the wittnesses"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Thomas
Ann          } twyns"


Comment:
Ending of surname is not certain.
"Saynt peere" is written at the end of this entry.


Comment:
"Sarah Lyddington
Mary Lyddington     } twins, daught[e]r[is]"


Comment:
"John Bowden son
Honor Bowden daught[e]r  } twins"


Comment:
"Robert Slutter
Richard Slutter  } twins"


Comment:
Beginning of forename is faded.
Surname is "Ancle" or "Aucle".


Comment:
"Bastard" is written in the margin to the left of this entry.


Comment:
"William Dizney
Mary Dizney        } twins"


Comment:
"(so[n] to) a foundlinge in East smith field"


Comment:
"Edward Boorne
Ellin Boorne        } twins"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Bastard" is written in the right margin beside this entry.


Comment:
Not explicitly stated that he is illegitimate but is described as son of M[aste]r Robert Ofley "gent of the temple" and Margaret Bird "a harlott".


Comment:
The second half of the surname is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"Jacob Hayward
Precilla Hayward } twins"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
Entry reads simply: "Elizabeth      daught[e]r to"


Comment:
Stated sex is "wife" - presumably an error for daughter as entry reads: "Mary Alexander wife to ffrancis Alexander and Amye his wife swan allie".


Comment:
An additional "John" is written after what is probably the surname - "Wildgose".
"John Wildgose John so[n] to"


Comment:
"Stephen Lambe }
Anna Lambe        } so[n] & daught[e]r[es]"
Margery Lambe   }
Possibly multiple birth, though doesn't say so explicitly.


Comment:
"Samuell Myles
Sarah Miles      } twins"


Comment:
In surname "de" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"William Goldinge
Elizabeth Goldinge } twins"


Comment:
"Susan Cock
Abigaile Cock } daught[e]r[es]"


Comment:
"Richard Moore
Ann Moore         } daught[e]r[es]"


Comment:
Described with two others are "theis were the Children of John Lawson" etc.


Comment:
Surname is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"Sollomon Pickin
Hannah Pickin     } twins"


Comment:
Forename "Johne" has been altered from "Joane". 
Beginning of stated sex "sonn" has been altered.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
The entry contains this forename only.


Comment:
"a foundling laid at M[aste]r vintons dore"


Comment:
Stated sex "son" is written as superscript with the deletion "daught[e]r" below it.


Comment:
"Thomas Larwood
Margaret Larwood } twins"


Comment:
Not described as illegitimate explicitly, but as daughter to "Thomas Blaike broker and Mary Norton . wife to Jo[h]n Norton sailer".


Comment:
"John Nicholles
Mary Nicholles   } twins"


Comment:
"a foundlinge neere the grate in hounsditch"


Comment:
"Richard goodgame
Alice Goodgame       } twins"


Comment:
"Elizabeth ffletcher
Mary ffletcher          } twins"


Comment:
"a Man Sonn of William Jones by Elizabeth his Wife"


Comment:
Surname is incomplete. "To" is followed by a gap in the manuscript.


Comment:
The forename is all that is contained within this entry and it is quite faint.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Richard & John Sonns of"


Comment:
There is an erasure between the forename and surname.


Comment:
Forename is a guess. It is barely legible, but possibly ends in "borah". Surname is not given or it is illegible.


Comment:
Forename is not certain. Surname is illegible.


Comment:
Forename is illegible.
Surname is barely legible and is partly a guess.


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Nicholas & John Isarell sons of"


Comment:
Surname is not stated explicitly.
"Henry & Anne Lee twins"
No information is given about either or both parents.


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Daniell and Elizabeth Petman Twins of"


Comment:
Entry reads simply: "Mary Hill a ffoundling".


Comment:
Forename may be written over an erasure.


Comment:
Name (one word) is illegible. Ending is "ley". Maybe "Whaley"?


Comment:
Entry reads: "Thomas Bainham son to Thomas and Anna Maria was Born in ye Victualling Office as the Parents Affirm to me"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Hannah & Susanna Prince Twins d[aughte]r[es] of"


Comment:
"Hannah & Susanna Prince Twins d[aughte]r[es] of"


Comment:
Entry reads simply: "Easter Algate a ffoundling".


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"John & Alicia Robison son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
"John & Alicia Robison son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"James & Mary Burton Twins son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
"James & Mary Burton Twins son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
"Mary Constance aged 24 yeares was Christned by D[o]c[to]r Hollingworth"


Comment:
"W[illia]m Kendall son of Elizabeth a Bastard"


Comment:
"Anne and Elizabeth Power D[aughte]r[e]s"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Eliz[abeth] & Anne Surby D[aughte]r[e]s"


Comment:
"Eliz[abeth] & Anne Surby D[aughte]r[e]s"


Comment:
"W[illia]m & Martha Hughes Son & D[aughte]r of"


Comment:
Forename is written as "Xopher" with mark of contraction.


Comment:
Surname is not certain. There are five minims.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Mary & Sarah d[aughte]r[e]s"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"John & Eliz[abeth] Hall son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
"John & Eliz[abeth] Hall son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
Entry reads simply: "W[illia]m Lane a ffoundlin"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Isaac & Jacob Clerke sons of"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"George and Jane Turvey Twins Son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
"George and Jane Turvey Twins Son & d[aughte]r of"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Martha & Mary Grenly d[aughte]r[e]s of"


Comment:
"Martha & Mary Grenly d[aughte]r[e]s of"


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is a gap in the manuscript where it should be.
Entry reads simply "Margrett     d[aughte]r of".


Comment:
Forename is very faded. It looks as if it may read "Johne".


Comment:
"Thomas Elexsander Bowers"
"Elexsander" - forename or part of surname?


Comment:
In forename the second "r" is written as superscript.


Comment:
Entry reads simply: "Robertt Warren son to".


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Richard & Sarah Sheppard son & d[aughte]r"


Comment:
"Richard & Sarah Sheppard son & d[aughte]r"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"ffrances & Eliz[abeth] Badham d[aughte]rs"


Comment:
"ffrances & Eliz[abeth] Badham d[aughte]rs"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
Forename is written as "Xopher" with mark of contraction and is all that exists of the entry.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"was borne the fifteenth day of March 1692/3 and Baptized the thirtieth day of the same month 1693. By Sylvanus Jones Curate of St Butolph"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"a soulders Child"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"a soulders child"


Comment:
"Elizabet" is scored out before the forename "Sarah".


Comment:
There is no mark of contraction in the forename.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"born ye 11"; presumably born 11 May.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Henry and Lucratiah twens son & D[augh]t[er]"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Rebecah Wife of John Crouch"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
In forename "Francis" has been altered to "Frances".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Martha and Elizabeth twens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Ageed 6 years and 2 Mounths"


Comment:
Forename is not certain. May begin with "P" rather than "J".
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Forename is very faint and is mostly illegible. It begins with "S" and ends with "en".
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Forename is very faded and is a guess.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Forename is written as "Jams".
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Ambros and John twins sons"


Comment:
Surname looks as if it has been added in later.


Comment:
Entry reads: "Mary Cob In Cobs Cort In Peticort Lane Church wardans".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Sarah and Englefeild Daughters"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
The second and third letters of the forename are a guess, as they are very faded.


Comment:
In forename "oe" is written as a diphthong.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
In forename "oe" is written as a diphthong.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"William and Mary Twinns"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"21 Years of age" is written at the end of the entry.


Comment:
"aged about 22 years of ye parrish of Poplar"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Joseph and Mary son and D[aughte]r"
"twins" is written at the end of the entry.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"wife of John Sansbury aged 34"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Illegitimat" is written at the end of this entry.


Comment:
Surname is not certain.
"Catherin nicol Was Born ye 28 Dr to Lenard        tower".


Comment:
Surname is not given - or is "feeld" the surname?


Comment:
Forename is not clear. Surname is not given.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Born ye 29 Ap[ri]ll"


Comment:
Forename is illegible. Surname ends in "hill"


Comment:
Name is illegible. It ends with "g".
Surname is not given or is illegible.


Comment:
There is no mark of contraction in the forename.


Comment:
Forename is written over something else.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Name is not given.
"A child of"
"not cristened"


Comment:
Forename is not entirely clear. It may end "lers" or "ley".


Comment:
There is no visible mark of contraction in the forename.
"son to" and names of parents are written as superscript with "^" beneath them.


Comment:
There is no visible mark of contraction in the forename.


Comment:
Second letter of the surname is not certain as it is very faded.


Comment:
Forename is very faded - may read "Jack"?


Comment:
Forename is not given or is not visible.


Comment:
Forename "Richard" is written above the deletion "Will[iam]".
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Edward & Margrat Twins"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"James & Eliz[abeth] James twins"


Comment:
Surname is not certain. It ends in "ton".


Comment:
There is no mark of contraction in the forename.
Surname is not certain.


Comment:
Name is not given or is not visible.
First visible word is "to".


Comment:
Forename is illegible as it has been partly cut off. It may end with an "s".


Comment:
In the surname the "t" does not have a horizontal stroke.


Comment:
There is a large "+" in different ink between the date and the forename.


Comment:
The forename has no mark of contraction.


Comment:
The first letter of the forename is not fully visible.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is no longer visible as page has been torn.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not visible.
Surname is not given.
"d[augh]t[er] to" is written twice.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is only partly visible.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not fully visible.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not fully visible.
"d[augh]t[er] to" is written twice.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is only partly visible.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not visible.


Comment:
The forename is a guess as only "rah" is visible.


Comment:
Forename is a guess as only "sabelah" is visible.


Comment:
Forename is a guess as only part of the "l" and "iz:" are visible.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not visible.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not visible.
"son" is written twice.


Comment:
Forename is a guess as only "seph" is visible.


Comment:
Forename is a guess as only "muill" is visible.


Comment:
The first minim of the forename is not visible. There is some blotting towards the end of the forename.


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not visible. There is a blot over "z".


Comment:
There is no mark of contraction in the forename.
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Eliz & Hanah Regoo Twins"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John & Mary Twins sun & dau[gh]t[e]r"


Comment:
The forename "John" is written above the deletion "George".


Comment:
There is a deletion after the forename.
Surname is not given.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Tho[mas] & John Twins"


Comment:
"Born and Baptiz att asmiths nere ye Hermatag"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Agnes and An Twins"


Comment:
In front of the name, "Eliz[abeth] Beaston" is deleted.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"son of Jacub: Brents chi att ye Hen and Chikens -Minoris"
Does description "chi" refer to the baptism subject (child)?


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"a soulders chi" - presumably refers to Eliz[abeth]: "d[augh]t[er] to John & Ann Prescot a soulders chi"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Thomas and Mary Marshall"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Eliz[abeth] & Sarah Twins"


Comment:
The initial letter of the surname is blotted.


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Mary and Martha Dill Tweens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Mary & Sarah Twins"


Comment:
The surname is written above the deletion "Martin".


Comment:
Surname is not certain. It ends in "dion".


Comment:
"a B" (Bastard?) is written as superscript (with "^" beneath it) after the father's surname - "Williams".
Surname is not given.


Comment:
"Tho[mas] Gatherick" has been deleted before this name.


Comment:
"John Wyfurd a bakers son to Edward and Eliz[abeth]"


Comment:
The first part of the surname is a guess. Surname ends in "loe".


Comment:
The initial letter of the surname is not certain.


Comment:
"a pore chi cold find not father | nor mother"


Comment:
The forename is written twice.
"Eliz[abeth] Eliz[abeth]"


Comment:
"Humphry Faver Brother son of Humphery & Isabell"
Is "Faver Brother" the surname or is "Brother son" the relationship?


Comment:
Surname is probably "Mickelson" with "son" omitted in relationship.
"Edward Mickelson to Edward" etc


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Sarah and Elizabeth twins"


Comment:
In the surname "worth" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
In the surname the final "d" has been altered from a "t".


Comment:
"was born in ye Victualling Offic as the parents affirm to me"
"as the parents affirm to me" is written on the line above the first part of this phrase.


Comment:
"John Haberdin Swan Aly son of John and Jane - East Smith feeld"


Comment:
The surname "Dobee" is written above the deletion "Clark".


Comment:
The surname "Cooper" is written below the deletion "Phillips".


Comment:
In the surname the "l" is written over another "e".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Joshuah & Ann twens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Martha & Eliz[abeth] Tweens"


Comment:
The surname is not written out separately in this entry, but there is a line linking the forename to the surname of the previous entry, suggesting that the surname may be applicable to this entry too.


Comment:
The forename "Cathern" is written after the deletion "Danill".


Comment:
Surname is not given?
"Dionysia Mar" is followed by blotting. Is "Mar" part of a middle name, e.g. "Mary"?


Comment:
"William Hounsdich a ----- Parish Child"


Comment:
Forename is written twice.
"Will[iam] William Lillee"


Comment:
"a soulders Chi"
Presumably this description refers to the baptism subject - "Tho[mas] Harisson son of Tho[mas] and Mary a soulders Chi".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Joseph and Ann Twins"


Comment:
"Par Ch" is written at the end of the entry - parish child?


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Jane & Susana Twins"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Henry and Jane Twins"


Comment:
"Walter" is deleted between the forename and surname.


Comment:
The forename looks as if it has been altered from "Martha".


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Ann and Susana Travis Twins"


Comment:
Forename "Ann" appears to be written above a deletion "John", but there is blotting around the beginning of this entry. Stated sex is "son".


Comment:
There is blotting at the start of the forename.


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"John & Thomas Renolds sons"
"John Born ye 6th November 1692"


Comment:
"John & Thomas Renolds sons"
"Thomas Born ye 7th of march 1693"


Comment:
"a Black a bout 18 or 19 year ould of St Martins of ye Felds"


Comment:
The forename "Eliz[abeth]" is written above the deletion "Henry".


Comment:
"Edmund Porter son son of".
Unclear whether "son" has been written twice in error, or if it is part of the surname.


Comment:
Surname is a guess.
It starts with "R" and ends in "bey" or "ley".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"William & Rebecah Tweens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John and Will[iam] sons"


Comment:
Surname is not given - or else "Stroulger" is the surname and there is no forename.


Comment:
The name and "son of" are written below the deletion "son of George and".


Comment:
"John Ancor a Black: a bout 20 years of Age"


Comment:
End of surname is a guess as there is a blot over it.


Comment:
Surname is not given. There is blotting at end of the forename.
Reading may be "William Avery and Eliz[abeth]" or "William" ? " Avery and Eliz[abeth]". Therefore unclear whether Avery and Eliz[abeth] are related people or whether Elizabeth is a subject.


Comment:
The first part of the surname is difficult to read because of blotting. The surname ends "omarty". May read "Cromarty".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Judeth and Sarah Twens"


Comment:
The first part of the surname is a guess as there is a large blot at this point.
Visible is "kinson".


Comment:
"a soulder chi" - is presumably a description of Sarah?


Comment:
Last two letters of the surname are not certain because of blotting.


Comment:
There is an erasure at the beginning of the entry. The forename is written over this? There is no mark of contraction in the forename.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Joseph & Benjamin Tweens"


Comment:
Surname appears to be "Hains". "Ha" is followed by a deletion and then "ins" is written above and to the right of this.


Comment:
Surname is not certain. It has been written over another name.


Comment:
There is an erasure between "a" and "r" in the surname.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Franscis and Hester Tweens"


Comment:
There is an erasure at the end of the surname.


Comment:
Forename is difficult to read because of blotting.


Comment:
In the surname "m" is written as superscript.


Comment:
"Thomas Aldgat Foundling by M[aste]r Trewlocks Order".


Comment:
"Robert Lyon a Foundling in Red Lion Aly -- Minoris"


Comment:
Surname is not certain.
In the surname "f"? is written over another letter.


Comment:
Reading of the initial letter of the surname is not certain. There is some overwriting at the start of the surname.


Comment:
In the surname "e" is written as superscript.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John and Georg tweens"


Comment:
The final "h" of the forename "Joshewah" is written over "y".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John a Foundling"


Comment:
The first "e" of the surname is written as superscript.


Comment:
In the forename "i" is written above a deletion.


Comment:
In the surname the final "d" is written over "t" and "y" is written over "ie".


Comment:
The fourth letter of the surname is not certain.


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Thomas & Mary Swetgrase tweens"


Comment:
In the forename the final "d" is written over "t".


Comment:
In the surname "son" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John and Margrat tweens"


Comment:
"Mary Bullock and Jane Squerill Parish Children"


Comment:
Spelling of surname is "Vallintne" - there is probably a minim short.


Comment:
"Mary Vine D[augh]t[e]r to afounling ---- by m[aste]r Durham Order"


Comment:
Surname could be "Daukins" or "Dankins".


Comment:
The surname was originally "Weaver" but the "a" has been crossed out (with an "X" over it).


Comment:
In the surname the "w" is written as superscript.


Comment:
The initial letter of the surname looks as if it was originally "R" but has been erased (although not completely) to leave "P".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Eliz[abeth] & Ann Tweens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Mary & Jane tweens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Elizabeth & Mary tweens"


Comment:
In the surname "mor" is written as superscript (above an attempt to amend the second part of the surname).


Comment:
Surname has been altered to "Toung" from "Young".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Alixander & Ann tweens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Benjamin and John tweens"


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"John & Thomas tweens"


Comment:
In the surname the second "h" is written over "d".


Comment:
Surname is not certain. There are other letters written above the last five.


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 12 of ^ Jelie march at home but was not Registred till 8 months afteruard as ye parents affirme"
"Jelie" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it. Presumably "march" has been written in error and baptism date was 12 July.


Comment:
"Richard Gun for soe was hee Called because hee was fownd being left in gun yard an Infante & baptized here"


Comment:
"was baptized the 31th of this march as ye parents affirme and at their Request was Registred almost two yeares after"


Comment:
"born & baptized the 7th of this Aprill as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"this Child was a yeare old before it was baptized in flishing yard"


Comment:
"was born the 15th day of this Aprill as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized at home ye 17 of this may"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the .1. of may in Conduitt yard"


Comment:
In the surname the "r" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 17 of this may"


Comment:
"was baptizd at their howse in tower ditch the 19th of this June as the parents affirme"
"their" refers to the parents.


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 26 of this June as the parrents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 7 day of this June as the parents affirme"
"this June as the parents affirme" is written on the next line and is probably part of this rather than the next entry.


Comment:
"baptized ye 17th of this July as the parents affirm"


Comment:
"was baptized the 27 day of July 1650 at home as the parents affirme"


Comment:
The initial letter of the forename is not certain.
"Baptized at home in haro ally"
This is followed by a further phrase, but this is not completely clear because the words are not fully visible.


Comment:
"was baptized at home as ye parents doe affirme the six day of this August"


Comment:
"was borne the 25 of may 1649 but was not baptized till the 8th of this october a yeare and almost 5 monthes old before he was baptized"
"old" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"was born ye 25th of this october as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"John and } Mair twins sons"
Thomas    }


Comment:
"Elizabeth & } Knight twins daughters"
Margerie      }


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 13 day of this nouember as the parents affirme and at their Requests was Registred about fiue months after"
"at home" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"was baptized the 25th of this december as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 21th day of this december as ye parents affirme"
"borne" is written above the deletion "baptized".


Comment:
Surname is not given.
"Mary and Elizabeth Twins daughters"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the seuenteene day of december as the parents affirme and was Registred the 7th of January ye ffollowinge"
There is a deleted letter before "as".


Comment:
"was baptized at home at their howse the seuenth day of this december as the parents affirme but fand at their Requests was after 3 monthes put in our Register"


Comment:
"was Baptized at home at their howse the 30th day of this december as the parentes affirme and at their Request was Registred about a yeare & 3 quarters after"


Comment:
"was baptized at home ye 3 of this January as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 5th of this January as ye parentes affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 13 day of this January as the parentes affirme in morles Rentes"


Comment:
"was baptized at their house the 28th of this January as the parentes affirme"


Comment:
"was Baptized the 13th day this January 1650 as the parentes affirme and at their Request was after Registred"


Comment:
"was Baptized at home the 2 of this ffebru as the parents affirme and was Registred a month afterwarde"


Comment:
"Mary and } Lawson twins daughters"
Sibell        }


Comment:
"was baptized at home ye 6th day of this ffebruary as ye parentes affirme and was Registred 3 months afterward at their Requests"


Comment:
"was Baptised ye 28th of february as ye parents     1650"
There is a gap between "parents" and "1650", but it is not clear whether or not the "1650" is part of this entry.


Comment:
"was borne the 2: of this march as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
The forename is written over an erasure.
"was baptized the 6th day of March 1650 as ye parentes affirme"


Comment:
"Abraham and } Willbie : twins sons"
Isaack               }


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 9th of this march as the parrents affirme but I John ffleete the Clark was not there and Registred a week after"


Comment:
"baptized at home the 29th of this march as ye parentes affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 5th of this Aprill as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the twelfe of this aprill as the parents & others affirme and at their Requests was Registred but I John ffleete the p[ar]ish Clark knew not of the baptizinge of it"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 21th of this Aprill as the parentes Affirme and was Rigistred at their Request 3 q[uarte]r of a yeare afterward"


Comment:
There is a large blot over the middle of the forename.


Comment:
There is a large blot which covers the end of the forename.


Comment:
"An Bottolphe a daughter fownd in grauell lane at m[aste]r Hulls dore being new borne and was soe named by ye Church warden"


Comment:
"born ye 27th of this may as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 21 of y[i]s may and at the parents requests was Registered a fortnight after"
"as ye" is written after "may" but looks as if it has been deleted.


Comment:
"was baptized at their house ye 24th of may as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was Baptized ye 24th of this June 1651 as the parentes affirme"


Comment:
"was borne ye .2. day of this July 1651 as ye parents said"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 9th day of this July as the parentes affirme and at their Requests was Registred"


Comment:
A note in the left margin (regarding this and the next entry) states that "these two wer Baptized at home and I knew not of it till two days after".


Comment:
A note in the left margin (concerning this and the previous entry) states that "these two wer Baptized at home and I knew not of it till two days after".


Comment:
"was baptized the 26 day as ye parentes afirm"


Comment:
"was born ye first day of this Nouember as ye parents affirm"


Comment:
"was baptized at y[ai]r house in Estgate y[ar]d the first day of this nouember as the parents afirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 9th day of this nouember 1651 as ye father affirms Butt was not Registred till a month after and at ye parents Request was put in ye Register"


Comment:
"baptized at home the 3 day of this nouember as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne ye .7th. day of y[i]s Nouember as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptizd the 13 of this nouember by baylis place as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was born ye 28 of this nouember as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"Mary & } Highnoone Twins daughters"
Martha  }


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 9th day of this January as the parente affirmes but was Registred fiue moneths after at the parentes Request"


Comment:
In the surname the "i" appears to have been written over an "r".


Comment:
"was baptized at home ye second of this february"


Comment:
"was born ye 7th of this ffebruary as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 7th day of March 1651 as the parentes affirme and at their Requestes was after Registred in this Booke"


Comment:
"was Baptized at home the 10th day of this March as the parents affirme and at the parents Request was Registred 6 moneths after"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 24th of this march as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"Beniamin & } Prater twins sons"
Joseph          }


Comment:
"was baptized the .2. of this Aprill as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized the second of this aprill"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 23 of this Aprill"
In the left margin there is a note: "our minister baptized this peter Rawlins and neuer told mee the Clark till about a fortnight after". "the Clark" is written as superscript with "^" beneath it.


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 21th day of this Aprill as the parentes Affirme and at ther Request was after Registred"


Comment:
"was baptized at home as the parentes Affirme the 19th day of May: 1652 and at their request was Entred the sixteene day of September next ffollowinge"


Comment:
"was baptized att home ye 17th day of this may as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 20th of this June and I knew it not till .7. dayes after"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 14th of this June by our minister m[aste]r Wise as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"Tymothie & } Hysome twines sons"
Oswald         }


Comment:
"baptized ye 28th of this July   Est end  as was affirmed by m[aste]r David" - this last name is not certain. There is a gap both before and after "Est end", which suggests that this is the address.


Comment:
In the surname the "u" is written over a "g".


Comment:
"was Baptized at home the 14th day of this september as the parents affirme and at there Request was Registred three weeks after"


Comment:
"baptized the 19th day of this september & borne the 9th day"


Comment:
"was borne the 29th of this september as the parentes affirme"


Birth_place:
m[aste]r Scotts house a grocer next ye 3 nuns

Baptism_place:
m[aste]r Scotts house a grocer next ye 3 nuns

Comment:
"born & baptized in m[aste]r Scotts house a grocer next ye 3 nuns ye 29th of Septembe 1652 as ye parents & frinds affirme"


Comment:
"was baptizd at their howse ye 7th of this Septemb[e]r as ye parents affirm"


Comment:
"baptized in morles Rents the 7th day of this october as the parents afirme"


Comment:
"born the 23th of this october and at the Command of m[aste]r Burbidge Churchwarden was Registred 9 years after"


Comment:
"Richard & } Standlee twins sons"
Roberte      }


Comment:
"baptized at home the 31th of this october as the parente affirme and at their Request was Registred a month after"


Comment:
"was born ye 25th of this October .1652 as ye parents affirms"


Comment:
"William & } Chuseman twines sons"
ffrancis      }


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 24th of this November as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"baptizd the 7th of this nouember as ye parent affirme"


Comment:
"was born the .30th. of this nouember as ye parents affirm"


Comment:
"was baptized the 5th day of this december as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was born the 4th. of this decem[ber] as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized ye 12th of this december as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"born ye 18th of this december 1652 as ye parents affirme"
Reading "1652" is a guess as it is very faint.


Comment:
"was born ye 14th of this december as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
The surname is written over an erasure and in different ink from most of the entry.


Comment:
Last letter of the surname is written over an "r"? or is deleted.


Comment:
"was born the 29th. of this January as the parents affirme and at their Request was entred in our Register foure years after"


Comment:
"was born & baptized ye Second of this february as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized the 5th day of this ffebruary as the parentes affirm"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the 10th day of this month as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"born as ye parent affirme the 22th of this ffebruary in Crab court"


Comment:
"was born ye 9th of this february as ye parents affirme


Comment:
"Dauid and } Atkinson twins son and daughter"
Elizabeth    }


Comment:
"was baptized the 11th day of this march as ye parent[es] affirme"


Comment:
"born ye 17th of this Aprill as ye parents affirme & not bapti[zed]"


Comment:
"was baptized at home the third day of this May at their hows next Algate & was Registred at thir Requestes"


Comment:
"was baptized ye 22th day of this may as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptized the 19th day of this month as is affirmed by the said parent[es] and m[ist]r[es]s Mary Tudman of the parish of St Magnus London, widdo who was present at the Birth, & christning of the said child"
"widdo" is written as superscript above "^"


Comment:
"was born ye 4th baptized ye 13th of this July as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 29th of this August 1653 and was baptized at home the 8th day of september next ffollowing as the parente affirme"


Comment:
"was borne ye 12th of this August as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"was borne the 2. of this september and baptized the fourth"


Comment:
"was baptizd ye 4th of this september 1653 as the parents affirme and was born ye 30th of last August"


Comment:
"was borne the 26th day of this september 1653 and was neglected 2. or 3 dayes to be Registred"
The last three words are written over an erasure.


Comment:
"born ye 25th Septem[ber] bapti[zed] 2 October"


Comment:
"born ye 24th septem[ber] baptized ye 2:octob[e]r"


Comment:
"born ye 27th. septem[ber] bapti[zed] ye 6th of october"


Comment:
"borne ye 5th bapti[zed] ye 7th octo[ber]"


Comment:
"born ye 30th. septem[ber] baptizd ye 9th. of octo[ber]"


Comment:
"borne ye 13 of this october & baptized about a fortnight after as ye parent affirmed & at their Request was after Registred"


Comment:
"born & baptized ye 17"
The "&" is written over another "ye".


Comment:
"born ye 22th of last octob[e]r baptizd ye 2 Nouem[ber]"


Comment:
"born ye 25th October baptizd ye 6th nouemb[e]r"


Comment:
"born ye 28th of last octob[e]r bapti[zed] ye 6th"


Comment:
"was born ye 13th. of this nouember as the parents affirme"


Comment:
"born ye 24th : Nouem[ber] . baptizd ye 4th"


Comment:
"born ye 30th Nouem[ber] bapti[zed] ye 4th"


Comment:
"born ye 24th Nouem[ber] baptizd ye 5th"


Comment:
"born 23th Nouem[ber] bapti[zed] ye 7th"


Comment:
"born ye 24th decem[ber] baptizd ye 1 January"


Comment:
"born ye 31th decem[ber] bapti[zed] ye first"


Comment:
"born ye 26th of decem[ber] & bapti[zed] ye first"


Comment:
"born ye 29th of decem[ber] baptizd ye first"


Comment:
"born ye 31th decem[ber] & bapti[zed] ye 6th"


Comment:
"born ye 28th decem[ber] bapti[zed] ye 8th"


Comment:
There is no stated sex given.
"Richard Church to Mathew Church & Hestar his wife"
"born ye 31th of Decem[ber] baptizd ye 8th"


Comment:
"born ye 29th of decem[ber] baptizd ye 12th"


Comment:
"John & } Mansir twins sons"
Thomas}
"born & baptizd ye 21th"


Comment:
"was born & baptized ye 18th day of this January as ye parents affirm"


Comment:
"born 26th January & bapti[zed] ye 2 ffebru[ary]"


Comment:
"born 23 January baptizd ye 5th febru[ary]"


Comment:
"born 21th January bapti[zed] 10 ffebru"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"Edward & John Nash twins sons"
"born & baptized ye 14th"


Comment:
"Edward & John Nash twins sons"
"born & baptized ye 14th"


Comment:
"born 27th of ffebruary bapti[zed] ye 5th March"


Comment:
"born ye 19th ffebru[ary] bapti[zed] 5th March"


Comment:
"born ye 23th ffebru[ary] bapti[zed] ye 5 March"


Comment:
Surname is not given explicitly.
"John & Phillip Milsom twins son"
"born ye 10th bapti[zed] ye 11th"


Comment:
"John & Phillip Milsom twins son"
"born ye 10th bapti[zed] ye 11th"


Comment:
"was born ye 25th of this march as the parents affirm"


Comment:
"born ye 30th of march baptizd ye 2. of Aprill"


Comment:
"born 2 baptized ye 7th"
"2" is written above a deletion.


Comment:
"born ye 17th. of last March bapti[zed] 7"


Comment:
"born ye 28 of Aprill bapti[zed] ye 7th"


Comment:
"born ye 28th of last Aprill bapti[zed] 14 may"


Comment:
In the forename the "r" is written as superscript.
"born ye 7th baptizd ye 14th"


Comment:
"was born ye .3. of this June & baptizd some few dayes after as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
There is an extra minim in the forename.
"born ye 24th baptizd ye 25th"


Comment:
"born ye 19th of June baptized ye 2 July"


Comment:
"born ye 29th of June baptizd ye 2 July"


Comment:
"was born & baptized ye 21th of July 1654 as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"was baptizd at home ye 9th of this July as ye parents affirme"


Comment:
"born 18th of July baptizd ye 1t of August"
In the baptism date "1" is written over another numeral.


Comment:
"born ye 25th July & baptizd ye 4th of August"


