Small Navigation Menu

Primary Menu

Prosecuting terrorism: the Old Bailey versus Belmarsh

Citation: Walker, Clive (2009) Prosecuting terrorism: the Old Bailey versus Belmarsh. Amicus Curiae, 2009 (79). pp. 21-25.

This paper considers the era of executive action which followed the immediate aftermath of 9/11 terrorist strikes in New York and the impact on United Kingdom domestic law leading to detention without trial ("Belmarsh") and control orders rather than prosecutions ("Old Bailey"). The first part of the paper examines the foundations for the reinvigoration of criminal justice in the UK and the second part explores the present and future implications for criminal justice.Article by Professor Clive Walker (Professor of Criminal Justice Studies at the University of Leeds) published in Amicus Curiae - Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal is produced by the Society for Advanced Legal Studies at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, University of London.

Additional Information: Citation: Amicus Curiae, Issue 79 Autumn 2009, pp.21-25.
Creators: Walker, Clive and
Subjects: Human Rights & Development Studies
Law
Politics
Keywords: Criminal prosecution, Criminal justice
Divisions: Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Collections: Amicus Curiae
Dates:
  • 2009 (published)
Comments and Suggestions:
Description/Provenance: Submitted by Steven Whittle (steven.whittle@sas.ac.uk) on 2010-03-26T15:29:33Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Amicus79_Walker.pdf: 584806 bytes, checksum: 6ca8010665b6de065a93714431ba5735 (MD5); Description/Provenance: Made available in DSpace on 2010-03-26T15:29:33Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Amicus79_Walker.pdf: 584806 bytes, checksum: 6ca8010665b6de065a93714431ba5735 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009. Date accessioned: 2010-03-26T15:29:33Z; Date available: 2010-03-26T15:29:33Z; Date issued: 2009.

Statistics

View details