SAS-Space, for world class research

Latest additions

Abstract

Antipathy to art in a recalcitrant court


The author examines the seminal case law produced by the European Court of Human Rights on freedom of artistic expression and its ethical boundaries, and analyses why the Court has been so reluctant to support artistic freedom. The article focuses on the cardinal constitutional laws of obscene and blasphemous libel, laws which are designed to fulfil the paternalistic function of insulating the moral approaches of citizens from what is considered by legislators and judges to be undesirable corruption. Article by Paul Kearns (Lecturer in Law at the School of Law, University of Manchester) published in Amicus Curiae – Journal of the Society for Advanced Legal Studies at the Institute of Advanced Legal Studies. The Journal is produced by SALS at the IALS (Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London).

Kearns, Paul (2006) Antipathy to art in a recalcitrant court. Amicus Curiae, 2006 (67). pp. 25-28. ISSN 1461-2097


Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Amicus Curiae, Issue 67, September/October 2006, pp.25-28
Subjects:Law
Keywords:Law and art, Law and aesthetics, Art and society, European Court of Human Rights, Freedom of expression
Divisions:Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Collections:Amicus Curiae
Deposited By:Steven Whittle
Date Deposited:09 Jun 2011 19:27
Last Modified:08 Aug 2011 10:48
ItemID:2934
Files available for downloadg
[img]
Preview
FilenameAmicus67_Kearns.pdf
File size97Kb
Download
License termsCreative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives - Available to public

Official URL: http://ials.sas.ac.uk/publish/amicus/amicus.htm

Comments Notes Tags All

Comments

Add a Comment


Close comments

Notes

Add a Note - this will be visible to you alone, while you are logged in.

Note title [optional]:

Close notes
Tag this item (You may enter a comma separated list):
Close tags

padlock
Repository Staff Only
Item control page