SAS-Space, for world class research

Latest additions

Abstract

What role has the language of legislation played in changes to the constitutional role of senior judges in British politics since 1960?


Some judges are born political, some seek out political power, and others have politics thrust upon them. This paper aims to show that the latter is the true description of developments in the constitutional role of senior British judges since 1960. The paper will outline the ‘unintended politicisation of the judiciary thesis’ which seeks to explain the increased political power of judges as a product of the increased enactment of ambiguous legislation by successive governments. This paper therefore adopts a historic institutionalist perspective, in order to move away from traditional accounts that explain changes in the institutional balance of British politics as being caused by the personal political ambitions of the judges themselves. The hypothesis tested for this paper is that legislation has become more ambiguous since 1960. A new methodology was required to test this hypothesis, with the result being a discourse analysis that has been used to objectively measure the ambiguity of legislative sections for a sample of 1,335 sections between 1960 and 2005. Results show with 95% confidence that legislation has become more ambiguous since 1960, with the 1980s and the 2000s showing the highest numbers of ambiguous legislative sections, at the time when strong Commons majorities allowed the government to pass a greater volume of legislation. However the 1990s showed the highest proportionate levels of ambiguity when government was hamstrung by a small Commons majority, and more had to be achieved from less legislation.

Williams, Matthew (2010) What role has the language of legislation played in changes to the constitutional role of senior judges in British politics since 1960? In: W G Hart Legal Workshop 2010: Comparative Aspects on Constitutions: Theory and Practice, 29th June - 1st July, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London. (Unpublished)


Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information:Paper presented by Matthew Williams, St Hilda's College, University of Oxford. This paper is being reworked by the author for publication.
Subjects:Law
Keywords:Judges, politicisation, legilsation, legislative drafting, language, constitution, England, Wales
Divisions:Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Collections:W G Hart Legal Workshop papers
Deposited By:Steven Whittle
Date Deposited:16 Feb 2012 11:18
Last Modified:16 Feb 2012 11:18
ItemID:3434
Files available for downloadg
[img]
Preview
FilenameWilliams,Matthew-WGH2010_Conference_Paper.pdf
File size175Kb
Download
License termsCreative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives - Available to public
Comments Notes Tags All

Comments

Add a Comment


Close comments

Notes

Add a Note - this will be visible to you alone, while you are logged in.

Note title [optional]:

Close notes
Tag this item (You may enter a comma separated list):
Close tags

padlock
Repository Staff Only
Item control page