SAS-Space, for world class research

Latest additions

Abstract

Advice and Consent vs. Silence and Dissent: The Contrasting Roles of the Legislature in U.S. and U.K. Judicial Appointments


The Senate’s role in judicial appointments has come under increasingly withering criticism for its uninformative and “spectacle”-like nature. At the same time, Britain has established two new judicial appointments processes—to accompany its new Supreme Court and existing lower courts—in which Parliament plays no part. This Article seeks to understand the reasons for the inclusion and exclusion of the legislature in the U.S. and U.K. judicial appointment processes adopted at the creation of their respective Supreme Courts (albeit created 220 years apart*). The Article proceeds by highlighting the ideas and concerns motivating inclusion of the legislature in judicial appointments in the early American state constitutions, Articles of Confederation, and U.S. Constitution, noting how the Senate’s role has evolved since the time of the Constitution’s ratification. (Part I) The Article then charts the principal ideas and concerns motivating the U.K. Constitutional Reform Act’s (CRA) overhaul of Britain’s judicial appointment systems and rejection of a parliamentary role. The Article also notes the Brown Administration’s post-CRA exploration of the possibility of parliamentary involvement in judicial (and other) appointments. (Part II)Thereafter, the Article compares and contrasts the reasons for inclusion and exclusion of the legislature in U.S. and U.K. judicial appointments. (Part III) * [The U.S. Supreme Court was established by the U.S. Constitution in 1787 and began operating in 1789. The U.K. Supreme Court was established by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 and began operating in 2009.]

Clark, Mary L. (2011) Advice and Consent vs. Silence and Dissent: The Contrasting Roles of the Legislature in U.S. and U.K. Judicial Appointments. In: W G Hart Legal Workshop 2010: Comparative Aspects on Constitutions: Theory and Practice, 29th June - 1st July, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, London.


Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Additional Information:Revised and updated version of paper presented by Professor Mary L. Clark, American University Washington College of Law. Published in Louisiana law review, issue 2, volume 71 (2011).
Subjects:Law
Keywords:Judicial appointments, parliamentary scrutiny, Judges, United States, United Kingdom
Divisions:Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Collections:W G Hart Legal Workshop papers
Deposited By:Steven Whittle
Date Deposited:20 Feb 2012 10:58
Last Modified:20 Feb 2012 10:58
ItemID:3436
Files available for downloadg
[img]
Preview
FilenameClark,Mary_Advice_and_Consent_vs__Silence_and_Dissent_-_in_final.pdf
File size252Kb
Download
License termsCreative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives - Available to public

Official URL: http://lawreview.law.lsu.edu/issues/articles/advic...

Comments Notes Tags All

Comments

Add a Comment


Close comments

Notes

Add a Note - this will be visible to you alone, while you are logged in.

Note title [optional]:

Close notes
Tag this item (You may enter a comma separated list):
Close tags

padlock
Repository Staff Only
Item control page