Citation: Kalderon, Mark (2004) Open Questions and the Manifest Image.
![[img]](https://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
UNSPECIFIED
Abstract
I argue that the open question argument and Frege’s puzzle (understood as a reductio of Millianism) are variants of the same argument. Once the parallel is appreciated, much of the standard commentary on the open question argument and its role in the case for nonnaturalism is inadequate. Not only do we learn something about the open question argument, but so too do we learn something about Frege’s puzzle: I argue that both are unsound for the same general reason.Article
Metadata
| Additional Information: | Citation: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (2004) 68: 251–289. |
|---|---|
| Creators: | Kalderon, Mark and |
| Subjects: | Philosophy |
| Keywords: | Metaethics, Open question argument, Frege's puzzle |
| Divisions: | Institute of Philosophy |
| Collections: | London Philosophy Papers |
| Dates: |
|
| Comments and Suggestions: | Description/Provenance: Submitted by Mark McBride (mark.mcbride@sas.ac.uk) on 2007-11-05T13:27:18Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
M_Kalderon_Manifest.pdf: 280382 bytes, checksum: 89c7a48b68634975dc976bfa77b158d1 (MD5);
Description/Provenance: Made available in DSpace on 2007-11-05T13:27:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
M_Kalderon_Manifest.pdf: 280382 bytes, checksum: 89c7a48b68634975dc976bfa77b158d1 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2004. Date accessioned: 2007-11-05T13:27:18Z; Date available: 2007-11-05T13:27:18Z; Date issued: 2004. |