Citation: Kalderon, Mark (2001) Reasoning and Representing.
![[img]](https://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png)
UNSPECIFIED
Abstract
I argue that given the best explanation of our logical understanding, some version of inferential role semantics must be the correct account of the determinants of logical content.Article
Metadata
| Additional Information: | Citation: Philosophical Studies (2001) 105: 129–60. |
|---|---|
| Creators: | Kalderon, Mark and |
| Subjects: | Philosophy |
| Keywords: | Inferential role semantics, Logical content |
| Divisions: | Institute of Philosophy |
| Collections: | London Philosophy Papers |
| Dates: |
|
| Comments and Suggestions: | Description/Provenance: Submitted by Mark McBride (mark.mcbride@sas.ac.uk) on 2007-11-05T13:33:05Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
M_Kalderon_Reasoning.pdf: 64791 bytes, checksum: 5b84d33252c6d24a385dc5e194f16d7e (MD5);
Description/Provenance: Made available in DSpace on 2007-11-05T13:33:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
M_Kalderon_Reasoning.pdf: 64791 bytes, checksum: 5b84d33252c6d24a385dc5e194f16d7e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2001. Date accessioned: 2007-11-05T13:33:05Z; Date available: 2007-11-05T13:33:05Z; Date issued: 2001. |