SAS-Space, for world class research

Latest additions

Abstract

Wittgenstein on Accord


The paper deals with the interpretation of Wittgenstein's views on the power of occurrent mental states to sort objects or states of affairs as in accord or in conflict with them, as presented in the rule-following passages of the Philosophical Investigations. I shall argue first that the readings advanced by Saul Kripke and John McDowell fail to provide a satisfactory construal of Wittgenstein's treatment of a platonist account of this phenomenon, according to which the sorting power of occurrent mental states is to be explained by reference to the mind's ability to grasp universals. I contend that the argument that Kripke extracts from Wittgenstein's discussion doesn't succeed in undermining the platonist position. Then I argue that McDowell's reading exhibits a more serious shortcoming: the position that he ascribes to Wittgenstein is indistinguishable from the platonist account. Then I put forward a proposal as to how to articulate the relationship between Wittgenstein's views and the platonist position.Article

Zalabardo, Jose (2003) Wittgenstein on Accord.


Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Citation: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly (2003) 84: 311–329.
Subjects:Philosophy
Keywords:Wittgenstein, McDowell
Divisions:Institute of Philosophy
Collections:London Philosophy Papers
Deposited By:Repository Administrator
Date Deposited:08 Oct 2010 11:25
Last Modified:12 Oct 2010 07:43
ItemID:689
Files available for downloadg
[img]
Preview
FilenameJ_Zalabardo_Wittgenstein.pdf
File size97Kb
Download
License termsAvailable to public
Comments Notes Tags All

Comments

Add a Comment


Close comments

Notes

Add a Note - this will be visible to you alone, while you are logged in.

Note title [optional]:

Close notes
Tag this item (You may enter a comma separated list):
Close tags

padlock
Repository Staff Only
Item control page