SAS-Space, for world class research

Latest additions

Abstract

Logical Content & Empirical Significance


This paper investigates the possibility of completing a Positivist style account of empirical significance. This is central to the positivists’ core project of demarcating science from metaphysics/the non-cognitively significant/ nonsense. After reviewing various reasons why the quest for a demarcation criterion has long been abandoned, it is argued that none of the traditional objections are compelling. In particular, it is shown that holism, the most widely cited ground for dismissing the possibility of a demarcation criterion, is perfectly compatible with a criterion of empirical significance. What is needed is an account that explains how a claim can be empirically significant within a given theory. It is shown that new research in logic; in particular the account of content developed in Gemes (1994) and (1996) provides machinery that solves the longstanding technical problems faced by Positivists’ attempts to formulate a holistic account of empirical significance.Article

Gemes, Ken (1998) Logical Content & Empirical Significance.


Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Citation: In "The Role of Pragmatics in Contemporary Philosophy", P. Weingartner, G. Schurz and G. Dorn (eds.).
Subjects:Philosophy
Keywords:Logical positivism, Holism
Divisions:Institute of Philosophy
Collections:London Philosophy Papers
Deposited By:Repository Administrator
Date Deposited:08 Oct 2010 11:18
Last Modified:12 Oct 2010 07:42
ItemID:765
Files available for downloadg
[img]
Preview
FilenameK_Gemes_Significance.pdf
File size72Kb
Download
License termsAvailable to public
Comments Notes Tags All

Comments

Add a Comment


Close comments

Notes

Add a Note - this will be visible to you alone, while you are logged in.

Note title [optional]:

Close notes
Tag this item (You may enter a comma separated list):
Close tags

padlock
Repository Staff Only
Item control page