SAS-Space, for world class research

Latest additions

Abstract

Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis


In recent years evolutionary psychologists have developed and defended the Massive Modularity Hypothesis, which maintains that our cognitive architecture—including the part that subserves ‘central processing’ —is largely or perhaps even entirely composed of innate, domain-specific computational mechanisms or ‘modules’. In this paper I argue for two claims. First, I show that the two main arguments that evolutionary psychologists have offered for this general architectural thesis fail to provide us with any reason to prefer it to a competing picture of the mind which I call the Library Model of Cognition. Second, I argue that this alternative model is compatible with the central theoretical and methodological commitments of evolutionary psychology. Thus I argue that, at present, the endorsement of the Massive Modularity Hypothesis by evolutionary psychologists is both unwarranted and unmotivated.Article

Samuels, Richard (1998) Evolutionary Psychology and the Massive Modularity Hypothesis.


Item Type:Article
Additional Information:Citation: The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (1998) 49: 575-602.
Subjects:Philosophy
Keywords:Evolutionary psychology, Massive modularity hypothesis
Divisions:Institute of Philosophy
Collections:London Philosophy Papers
Deposited By:Repository Administrator
Date Deposited:08 Oct 2010 11:38
Last Modified:12 Oct 2010 07:44
ItemID:937
Files available for downloadg
[img]
Preview
FilenameR_Samuels_Evolutionary.pdf
File size1416Kb
Download
License termsAvailable to public
Comments Notes Tags All

Comments

Add a Comment


Close comments

Notes

Add a Note - this will be visible to you alone, while you are logged in.

Note title [optional]:

Close notes
Tag this item (You may enter a comma separated list):
Close tags

padlock
Repository Staff Only
Item control page