Citation: Heinaman, Robert (2002) Plato's Division of Goods in the Republic.
UNSPECIFIED
Abstract
In the Republic Plato draws a distinction among goods between (1) those that are good in themselves but not good for their consequences, (2) those that are good both in themselves and for their consequences, and (3) those that are not good in themselves but are good for their consequences. This paper presents an interpretation of this classification, in particular its application to the case of justice. It is argued that certain causal consequences of justice as well as factors that are not causal consequences of justice are relevant in explaining why justice is good in itself; and that it is only the reputation for justice and the causal consequences that follow from that reputation that are relevant in explaining why it is good for its consequences.Article
Metadata
Additional Information: | Citation: Phronesis (2002) 47: 309-335. |
---|---|
Creators: | Heinaman, Robert and |
Subjects: | Philosophy |
Keywords: | Plato, The Republic, Justice |
Divisions: | Institute of Philosophy |
Collections: | London Philosophy Papers |
Dates: |
|
Comments and Suggestions: | Description/Provenance: Submitted by Mark McBride (mark.mcbride@sas.ac.uk) on 2007-10-31T12:08:32Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
R_Heinaman_Plato.pdf: 113039 bytes, checksum: fe50d47c1d80a78b10761b19fc0f71b7 (MD5);
Description/Provenance: Made available in DSpace on 2007-10-31T12:08:32Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
R_Heinaman_Plato.pdf: 113039 bytes, checksum: fe50d47c1d80a78b10761b19fc0f71b7 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2002. Date accessioned: 2007-10-31T12:08:32Z; Date available: 2007-10-31T12:08:32Z; Date issued: 2002. |