Small Navigation Menu

Primary Menu

The reasons for the rise and fall of Bearer Shares: a company law comparison between the UK and some offshore jurisdictions

Citation: Vanterpool, Andre (2016) The reasons for the rise and fall of Bearer Shares: a company law comparison between the UK and some offshore jurisdictions. Masters thesis, Institute of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Advanced Study, University of London.

Final Dissertation_LLM ICGFREL_1443984_Andre Vanterpool.pdf

Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0

Moving forward for the need for more transparency, the United Kingdom has also established a Beneficial Ownership Register which publicly accessible while the offshore financial centres have refused. Many Offshore Financial Centres are moving toward controlling Bearer Shares in order to keep in line with the Organization for Economic and Cooperative Development’s push for more transparency. As of 2015, the United Kingdom has altered its Company Law and has totally abolished Bearer Shares. However, Offshore Financial Centres such as The Cayman Islands through now immobilised, The British Virgin Islands and more recently the Republic of Panama have found an innovative solution through the immobilisation of bearer shares to protect privacy while still managing to control illegal activities. Over all with the abolishing of bearer shares and the new beneficial ownership register the United Kingdom is moving towards Greater transparency.

Creators: Vanterpool, Andre and
Related URLs:
Subjects: Law
Keywords: Commercial law, company law, offshore finance, United Kingdom, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Panama
Divisions: Institute of Advanced Legal Studies
Collections: Dissertation
Theses and Dissertations
Dates:
  • 2016 (accepted)

Statistics

View details