Abstract
I want to promote what I shall call (unoriginally, and for the sake of its having a name ) 'the identity theory of truth'. I suggest that other accounts put forward as theories of truth are genuine rivals to it, but are unacceptable. A certain conception of thinkables belongs with the identity theory's conception of truth. I introduce these conceptions in Part I, by reference to John McDowell's Mind and World; and I show why they have a place in an identity theory, which I introduce by reference to Frege. In Part II, I elaborate on the conception of thinkables, with a view to demonstrating that the identity theory's conception of truth is defensible. Part III is concerned with the theory's relation to some recent work on the concept of truth: I hope to show that the identity theorist not only has a defensible conception of truth, but also, in the present state of play, has appropriate ambitions.Article
Metadata
Additional Information: | Citation: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (1997) 97: 1-24. |
---|---|
Creators: | Hornsby, Jennifer and |
Subjects: | Philosophy |
Keywords: | Truth, Identity theory |
Divisions: | Institute of Philosophy |
Collections: | London Philosophy Papers |
Dates: |
|
Comments and Suggestions: | Description/Provenance: Submitted by Mark McBride (mark.mcbride@sas.ac.uk) on 2008-01-05T16:49:29Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
J_Hornsby_Truth.pdf: 102090 bytes, checksum: 512793626455a2529ad5c7cba23bd468 (MD5);
Description/Provenance: Made available in DSpace on 2008-01-05T16:49:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
J_Hornsby_Truth.pdf: 102090 bytes, checksum: 512793626455a2529ad5c7cba23bd468 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 1997. Date accessioned: 2008-01-05T16:49:30Z; Date available: 2008-01-05T16:49:30Z; Date issued: 1997. |