Abstract
This paper applies a teleosemantic perspective to the question of whether there is genuine representation outside the familar realm of belief-desire psychology. I first explain how teleosemantics accounts for the representational powers of beliefs and desires themselves. I then ask whether biological states which are simpler than belief and desires can also have representational powers. My conclusion is that such biologically simple states can be ascribed representational contents, but only in a system-relative way: such states must be ascribed varying contents when viewed as components in different biological systems. I conclude by arguing that 'the genetic code' does not even embody this kind of system-relative representation.Article
Metadata
Additional Information: | Citation: Ratio (2003) 16: 107-123. |
---|---|
Creators: | Papineau, David and |
Subjects: | Philosophy |
Keywords: | Representation, Teleosemantics |
Divisions: | Institute of Philosophy |
Collections: | London Philosophy Papers |
Dates: |
|
Comments and Suggestions: | Description/Provenance: Submitted by Mark McBride (mark.mcbride@sas.ac.uk) on 2008-01-19T21:14:35Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
D_Papineau_Rife..pdf: 33389 bytes, checksum: 3df578253e55411f7b20075093c62cb3 (MD5);
Description/Provenance: Made available in DSpace on 2008-01-19T21:14:35Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
D_Papineau_Rife..pdf: 33389 bytes, checksum: 3df578253e55411f7b20075093c62cb3 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2003. Date accessioned: 2008-01-19T21:14:35Z; Date available: 2008-01-19T21:14:35Z; Date issued: 2003. |