Small Navigation Menu

Primary Menu

It's not a game: accurate representation with toy models

Citation: Nguyen, James (2019) It's not a game: accurate representation with toy models. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science . (In Press)

BJPSarchive.pdf

Creative Commons: Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0

Restricted to Embargoed until 23 March 2021.

Request a copy

Drawing on `interpretational' accounts of scientific representation, I argue that the use of so-called `toy models' provides no particular philosophical puzzle. More specifically; I argue that once one gives up the idea that models are accurate representations of their targets only if they are appropriately similar, then simple and highly idealised models can be accurate in the same way that more complex models can be. Their differences turn on trading precision for generality, but, if they are appropriately interpreted, toy models should nevertheless be considered accurate representations. A corollary of my discussion is a novel way of thinking about idealisation more generally: idealised models may distort features of their targets, but they needn't misrepresent them.

Creators: Nguyen, James and
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz010
Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/bjps/advance-article/doi/...
Subjects: Philosophy
Divisions: Institute of Philosophy
Dates:
  • 23 March 2019 (published)
  • 19 March 2019 (accepted)

Statistics

View details