Citation: Wells, Naomi and Forsdick, Charles and Bradley, Jessica and Burdett, Charles and Burns, Jennifer and Demossier, Marion and Hills de Zárate, Margaret and Huc-Hepher, Saskia and Jordan, Shirley and Pitman, Thea and Wall, Georgia (2019) Ethnography and Modern Languages. Modern Languages Open, 1 (1). pp. 1-16. ISSN 2052-5397
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Abstract
While rarely explicitly recognized in our disciplinary frameworks, the openness and curiosity on which Modern Languages in the UK is founded are, in many ways, ethnographic impulses. Ethnographic theories and practices can be transformative in relation to the undergraduate curriculum, providing an unparalleled model for experiential and holistic approaches to language and cultural learning. As a form of emplaced and embodied knowledge production, ethnography promotes greater reflexivity on our geographical and historical locations as researchers, and on the languages and cultures through which we engage. An ethnographic sensitivity encourages an openness to less hierarchical and hegemonic forms of knowledge, particularly when consciously seeking to invert the traditional colonial ethnographic project and envision instead more participatory and collaborative models of engagement. Modern Languages scholars are at the same time ideally placed to challenge a monolingual mindset and an insensitivity to language-related questions in existing ethnographic research located in cognate disciplines. For Modern Languages to embrace ethnography with credibility, we propose a series of recommendations to mobilize these new research and professional agendas.
Metadata
Additional Information: | In order to ensure transparency in the development of this document, it arose from a Translating Cultures and Cross-Language Dynamics: Reshaping Community (School of Advanced Study) workshop hosted at the Institute of Modern Languages Research in November 2017 and the ideas within are consequently indebted to all those who contributed to the day (see Wells 2018 for details of all of the speakers at the event, in addition to F. Carpenedo, B. Spadaro and G. Wall who took detailed notes). An initial document was subsequently drafted by N. Wells and C. Forsdick, and circulated to all speakers and attendees for further comment. The authors listed alphabetically here are those who contributed with valuable additional responses, suggestions and comments and who subsequently were actively consulted and involved in producing the final version. |
---|---|
Creators: | Wells, Naomi (0000-0001-9900-0817) and Forsdick, Charles and Bradley, Jessica and Burdett, Charles and Burns, Jennifer and Demossier, Marion and Hills de Zárate, Margaret and Huc-Hepher, Saskia and Jordan, Shirley and Pitman, Thea and Wall, Georgia and |
DOI: | https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo.v0i0.242 |
Official URL: | https://www.modernlanguagesopen.org/articles/10.38... |
Subjects: | Culture, Language & Literature Sociology & Anthropology |
Keywords: | Ethnography, Modern Languages, UK, Higher Education, cultural translation |
Divisions: | Institute of Modern Languages Research |
Dates: |
|